IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p8146-d854756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Residential Environmental Screening and Perception Surveys on Superfund Environmental Health Risk Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Raja M. Nagisetty

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Montana Technological University, 1300 W. Park Street, Butte, MT 59701, USA)

  • William B. Macgregor

    (Department of Professional and Technical Communications, Montana Technological University, 1300 W. Park Street, Butte, MT 59701, USA)

  • David Hutchins

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Montana Technological University, 1300 W. Park Street, Butte, MT 59701, USA)

  • Daniel A. Autenrieth

    (Department of Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene, Montana Technological University, 1300 W. Park Street, Butte, MT 59701, USA)

  • Alyssa M. Plant

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Montana Technological University, 1300 W. Park Street, Butte, MT 59701, USA)

Abstract

Residents at one of the nation’s largest and longest-operating Superfund sites (Butte, Montana) have expressed environmental health risk perceptions that often diverge from those of EPA and other official stakeholders responsible for the investigation and remediation of site contamination aimed at protecting human health and the environment. A random sample of Butte residents participated in a study of how home-based environmental screening influences environmental health perceptions. Participants completed surveys measuring environmental health perceptions before and after a home site screening of soil and drinking water for lead and arsenic conducted by the research team. Local air monitoring for the same contaminants was also completed during the study period. The home-based screening intervention improved the alignment of subjective participant environmental health perceptions with objective environmental screening measures. Key features of the process that helped achieve this effect included (1) co-locating the collection of participant perceptions and individualized screening measurements; (2) sharing environmental screening results in a clear and unbiased manner; and (3) conducting this work independent of agencies and organizations with direct responsibility for Superfund-related cleanup activities. Empowering residents of a Superfund community with knowledge of the specific kinds and levels of environmental contamination in their home environment may help overcome the gap between agency conclusions regarding environmental health risk and the perceptions of community members.

Suggested Citation

  • Raja M. Nagisetty & William B. Macgregor & David Hutchins & Daniel A. Autenrieth & Alyssa M. Plant, 2022. "Effects of Residential Environmental Screening and Perception Surveys on Superfund Environmental Health Risk Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8146-:d:854756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minerva Catalán‐Vázquez & Astrid Schilmann & Horacio Riojas‐Rodríguez, 2010. "Perceived Health Risks of Manganese in the Molango Mining District, Mexico," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 619-634, April.
    2. Piyapong Janmaimool & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2014. "Evaluating Determinants of Environmental Risk Perception for Risk Management in Contaminated Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woonsun Kang, 2023. "Exploring the Nexus between Transparency and Citizens’ Intention to Participate in Climate Change Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Yanwei Lyu & Jinning Zhang & Fei Yang & Di Wu, 2022. "The “Local Neighborhood” Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Health System Trust and Compliance with COVID-19 Restrictions," IZA Discussion Papers 15961, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Sandra Cortés & Soledad Burgos & Héctor Adaros & Boris Lucero & Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, 2021. "Environmental Health Risk Perception: Adaptation of a Population-Based Questionnaire from Latin America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Kuo-Wei Hsu & Jen-Chih Chao & Ching-Yi Hsu, 2021. "Environmental Risk Perception and Preventive Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Mikyong Shin & Angela K. Werner & Heather Strosnider & Lisa B. Hines & Lina Balluz & Fuyuen Y. Yip, 2019. "Public Perceptions of Environmental Public Health Risks in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Joan Costa-i-Font & Cristina Vilaplana-Prieto, 2023. "Health System Trust and Compliance with Covid-19 Restrictions," CESifo Working Paper Series 10291, CESifo.
    6. Yong Chen & Yaqi Liang & Hao Zhou & Qiaozhi Wang & Yanzhong Liu, 2022. "Farmers’ Adaptive Behaviors to Heavy Metal-Polluted Cultivated Land in Mining Areas: The Influence of Farmers’ Characteristics and the Mediating Role of Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Zhengtao Li & Henk Folmer & Jianhong Xue, 2016. "Perception of Air Pollution in the Jinchuan Mining Area, China: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Trusting the health system and COVID 19 restriction compliance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118267, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Minerva Catalán‐Vázquez & Horacio Riojas‐Rodríguez & Blanca Estela Pelcastre‐Villafuerte, 2014. "Risk: For Whom? Representations of Mining Activity by Different Social Actors in the Molango Manganese District of Hidalgo, Mexico," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 28-43, January.
    10. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Trusting the Health System and COVID 19 Restriction Compliance," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8146-:d:854756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.