IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p367-d714354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expanding the Conceptualization of Support in Low-Wage Carework: The Case of Home Care Aides and Client Death

Author

Listed:
  • Emma K. Tsui

    (Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Marita LaMonica

    (Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Maryam Hyder

    (Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Paul Landsbergis

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, State University of New York (SUNY)-Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, NY 11203, USA)

  • Jennifer Zelnick

    (Graduate School of Social Work, Touro College, New York, NY 10001, USA)

  • Sherry Baron

    (Barry Commoner Center for Health and the Environment, Queens College, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 11365, USA)

Abstract

Home care aides are a rapidly growing, non-standard workforce who face numerous health risks and stressors on the job. While research shows that aides receive limited support from their agency employers, few studies have explored the wider range of support that aides use when navigating work stress and considered the implications of these arrangements. To investigate this question, we conducted 47 in-depth interviews with 29 home care aides in New York City, focused specifically on aides’ use of support after client death. Theories of work stress, the social ecological framework, and feminist theories of care informed our research. Our analysis demonstrates aides’ extensive reliance on personal sources of support and explores the challenges this can create in their lives and work, and, potentially, for their communities. We also document aides’ efforts to cultivate support stemming from their home-based work environments. Home care aides’ work stress thus emerges as both an occupational health and a community health issue. While employers should carry responsibility for preventing and mitigating work stress, moving toward health equity for marginalized careworkers requires investing in policy-level and community-level supports to bolster employer efforts, particularly as the home care industry becomes increasingly fragmented and non-standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma K. Tsui & Marita LaMonica & Maryam Hyder & Paul Landsbergis & Jennifer Zelnick & Sherry Baron, 2021. "Expanding the Conceptualization of Support in Low-Wage Carework: The Case of Home Care Aides and Client Death," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:367-:d:714354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy Folbre & Leila Gautham & Kristin Smith, 2021. "Essential Workers and Care Penalties in the United States," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1-2), pages 173-187, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leah F. Vosko & Tanya Basok & Cynthia Spring & Guillermo Candiz & Glynis George, 2022. "Understanding Migrant Farmworkers’ Health and Well-Being during the Global COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada: Toward a Transnational Conceptualization of Employment Strain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Setterfield, 2024. "Integrating the Social Reproduction of Labour into Macroeconomic Theory," Working Papers 2405, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    2. Corsi, Marcella & Ilkkaracan, Ipek, 2022. "COVID-19, Gender and Labour," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1012, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Zdravka Todorova, 2024. "Social processes of oppression in the stratified economy and Veblenian feminist post Keynesian connections," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 25-54, January.
    4. Shahra Razavi, 2022. "Making the Right to Social Security a Reality for All Workers," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(2), pages 269-294, June.
    5. Janna Klostermann & Laura Funk & Holly Symonds-Brown & Maria Cherba & Christine Ceci & Pat Armstrong & Jeanette Pols, 2022. "The Problems with Care: A Feminist Care Scholar Retrospective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Elena CAMILLETTI & Zahrah NESBITT‐AHMED, 2022. "COVID‐19 and a “crisis of care”: A feminist analysis of public policy responses to paid and unpaid care and domestic work," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(2), pages 195-218, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:367-:d:714354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.