IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p2840-d514666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility

Author

Listed:
  • Sol Lim

    (Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0020, USA)

  • Clive D’Souza

    (Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2117, USA)

Abstract

Multiple field studies provide qualitative accounts of usability barriers experienced by users of wheeled mobility devices on public transit. This study aimed to examine these usability barriers from the theoretical perspective of Environmental Docility by quantifying the relationship between functional capabilities of wheeled mobility device users and ingress–egress performance on accessible fixed-route transit vehicles in an urban setting. Twenty-eight wheeled mobility users each completed three trips on a predetermined route through the local public transit system. Ingress and egress times, user-reported usability ratings and open-ended comments were analyzed. Regression analyses indicated significant interactions between age and minimum parallel-park length on ingress and egress times. Specifically, lower functional capability reflected in older age and less maneuvering ability predicted decreased performance (longer ingress–egress times), indicating less adaptability to environmental demands and agreement with the Environmental Docility Hypothesis. Usability ratings and comments revealed difficulty with negotiating access ramps and turning maneuvers in the vehicle interior and in proximity to other passengers. Despite compliance with accessibility standards, current design of transit vehicles present substantial usability barriers for wheeled mobility users. Environmental Docility provides a theoretical basis to identifying modifiable factors related to person and environment for improving usability of public transit for people aging and/or with mobility impairments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sol Lim & Clive D’Souza, 2021. "Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2840-:d:514666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2840/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2840/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henly, Megan & Brucker, Debra L., 2019. "Transportation patterns demonstrate inequalities in community participation for working-age Americans with disabilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 93-106.
    2. Kostyniuk, Lidia P. & D'Souza, Clive R., 2020. "Effect of passenger encumbrance and mobility aid use on dwell time variability in low-floor transit vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 872-881.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralph, Kelcie & Morris, Eric A. & Kwon, Jaekyeong, 2022. "Disability, access to out-of-home activities, and subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 209-227.
    2. Abbasi, Sorath & Ko, Joonho & Min, Jaehong, 2021. "Measuring destination-based segregation through mobility patterns: Application of transport card data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Levine, Kaylyn & Karner, Alex, 2023. "Approaching accessibility: Four opportunities to address the needs of disabled people in transportation planning in the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2840-:d:514666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.