IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p986-d485576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Policy Environment for Active Mobility in Cities—Development and Feasibility of the PASTA Cycling and Walking Policy Environment Score

Author

Listed:
  • Sonja Kahlmeier

    (Department of Health, Swiss Distance University of Applied Science (FFHS), 3900 Brig, Switzerland
    Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), Epidemiology, University of Zurich, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Esther Anaya Boig

    (Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London SW7 1NE, UK)

  • Alberto Castro

    (Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), Epidemiology, University of Zurich, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Emilia Smeds

    (Technology, Engineering and Public Policy (STEaPP), Department for Science, University College London, London WC1E 6JA, UK)

  • Fabrizio Benvenuti

    (Roma Servizi per la mobilità, 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Ulf Eriksson

    (Trivector, 11123 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Francesco Iacorossi

    (Roma Servizi per la mobilità, 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen

    (Institute for Global Health (IS Global), 08003 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Luc Int Panis

    (Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO, 2400 Mol, Belgium
    School for Mobility, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)

  • David Rojas-Rueda

    (Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
    Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1601, USA)

  • Sandra Wegener

    (Institute for Transport Studies (ITS), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences BOKU, 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Audrey de Nazelle

    (Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London SW7 1NE, UK)

Abstract

The importance of setting a policy focus on promoting cycling and walking as sustainable and healthy modes of transport is increasingly recognized. However, to date a science-driven scoring system to assess the policy environment for cycling and walking is lacking. In this study, spreadsheet-based scoring systems for cycling and walking were developed, including six dimensions (cycling/walking culture, social acceptance, perception of traffic safety, advocacy, politics and urban planning). Feasibility was tested using qualitative data from pre-specified sections of semi-standardized interview and workshop reports from a European research project in seven cities, assessed independently by two experts. Disagreements were resolved by discussions of no more than 75 minutes per city. On the dimension “perception of traffic safety”, quantitative panel data were used. While the interrater agreement was fair, feasibility was confirmed in general. Validity testing against social norms towards active travel, modal split and network length was encouraging for the policy area of cycling. Rating the policy friendliness for cycling and walking separately was found to be appropriate, as different cities received the highest scores for each. Replicating this approach in a more standardized way would pave the way towards a transparent, evidence-based system for benchmarking policy approaches of cities towards cycling and walking.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonja Kahlmeier & Esther Anaya Boig & Alberto Castro & Emilia Smeds & Fabrizio Benvenuti & Ulf Eriksson & Francesco Iacorossi & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen & Luc Int Panis & David Rojas-Rueda & Sandra Wege, 2021. "Assessing the Policy Environment for Active Mobility in Cities—Development and Feasibility of the PASTA Cycling and Walking Policy Environment Score," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:986-:d:485576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anil Markandaya & Ben Armstrong & Simon Hales & Aline Chiabai & Patrick Criqui & Silvana Mima, 2009. "Impact on public health of strategies to reduce greenhouse gases : low carbon electricity generation," Post-Print halshs-00459664, HAL.
    2. Thomas Götschi & Jan Garrard & Billie Giles-Corti, 2016. "Cycling as a Part of Daily Life: A Review of Health Perspectives," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 45-71, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Berrigan & Andrew L. Dannenberg & Michelle Lee & Kelly Rodgers & Janet R. Wojcik & Behram Wali & Calvin P. Tribby & Ralph Buehler & James F. Sallis & Jennifer D. Roberts & Ann Steedly & Binbin P, 2021. "The 2019 Conference on Health and Active Transportation: Research Needs and Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Soliz, Aryana & Carvalho, Thiago & Sarmiento-Casas, Claudio & Sánchez-Rodríguez, Jorge & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2023. "Scaling up active transportation across North America: A comparative content analysis of policies through a social equity framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hudde, Ansgar, 2022. "The unequal cycling boom in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Shreya S. Shrikhande & Sonja Merten & Olga Cambaco & Tristan Lee & Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy & Martin Röösli & Mohammad Aqiel Dalvie & Jürg Utzinger & Guéladio Cissé, 2023. "“Climate Change and Health?”: Knowledge and Perceptions among Key Stakeholders in Puducherry, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Federico Fraboni & Gabriele Prati & Giulia Casu & Marco De Angelis & Luca Pietrantoni, 2022. "A cluster analysis of cyclists in Europe: common patterns, behaviours, and attitudes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 591-620, April.
    4. Christina Zapata & Nicholas Muller & Michael Kleeman, 2013. "PM 2.5 co-benefits of climate change legislation part 1: California’s AB 32," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 377-397, March.
    5. Juseung Lee & Ducksu Seo, 2022. "Influences of Urban Bikeway Design and Land Use on Bike Collision Severity: Evidence from Pohang in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Hensher, David A. & Wei, Edward & Liu, Wen & Balbontin, Camila, 2024. "Profiling future passenger transport initiatives to identify the growing role of active and micro-mobility modes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Kwiatkowski Michał Adam, 2024. "Bicycle critical mass events 30 years on – are they an urban mobility movement or a bicycle festival?," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 28-39.
    8. Guilhem Lecouteux & Léonard Moulin, 2023. "Cycling in the Aftermath of COVID-19: An Empirical Estimation of the Social Dynamics of Bicycle Adoption in Paris," GREDEG Working Papers 2023-02, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    9. Pivithuru Kalpana Nanayakkara & Nano Langenheim & Irene Moser & Marcus White, 2022. "Do Safe Bike Lanes Really Slow Down Cars? A Simulation-Based Approach to Investigate the Effect of Retrofitting Safe Cycling Lanes on Vehicular Traffic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Rachel Aldred & Susana García-Herrero & Esther Anaya & Sixto Herrera & Miguel Ángel Mariscal, 2019. "Cyclist Injury Severity in Spain: A Bayesian Analysis of Police Road Injury Data Focusing on Involved Vehicles and Route Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Gong, Wenjing & Rui, Jin & Li, Tianyu, 2024. "Deciphering urban bike-sharing patterns: An in-depth analysis of natural environment and visual quality in New York's Citi bike system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Michael Kleeman & Christina Zapata & John Stilley & Mark Hixson, 2013. "PM 2.5 co-benefits of climate change legislation part 2: California governor’s executive order S-3-05 applied to the transportation sector," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 399-414, March.
    13. Bimala Sharma & Hae Kweun Nam & Wanglin Yan & Ha Yun Kim, 2019. "Barriers and Enabling Factors Affecting Satisfaction and Safety Perception with Use of Bicycle Roads in Seoul, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-10, March.
    14. Patrick Criqui & Silvana Mima, 2012. "European climate -- energy security nexus: A model based scenario analysis," Post-Print halshs-00661043, HAL.
    15. Yubing Zheng & Yang Ma & Nan Li & Jianchuan Cheng, 2019. "Personality and Behavioral Predictors of Cyclist Involvement in Crash-Related Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Paola A. Torres-Slimming & Carlee J. Wright & Guillermo Lancha & Cesar P. Carcamo & Patricia J. Garcia & James D. Ford & IHACC Research Team & Sherilee L. Harper, 2020. "Climatic Changes, Water Systems, and Adaptation Challenges in Shawi Communities in the Peruvian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Yuan-Shen Zhu & Zhuo Sun & Dan-Dan Ke & Jia-Qi Yang & Wen-Yun Li & Ze-Qun Deng & Yong-Zhen Li & Min Wu & Li-Ming Wen & Geng-Sheng He, 2021. "Modes of Transport to School and Their Associations with Weight Status: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Students in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-8, April.
    18. Weiyan Gong & Fan Yuan & Ganyu Feng & Yanning Ma & Yan Zhang & Caicui Ding & Zheng Chen & Ailing Liu, 2020. "Trends in Transportation Modes and Time among Chinese Population from 2002 to 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, February.
    19. Gössling, Stefan & McRae, Sophia, 2022. "Subjectively safe cycling infrastructure: New insights for urban designs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Shahin Keynoush & Ehsan Daneshyar, 2022. "Defining a Pedagogical Framework for Integrating Buildings and Landscapes in Conjunction with Social Sustainability Discourse in the Architecture Graduate Design Studio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:986-:d:485576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.