IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p849-d483450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Study of the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing ‘Sit-To-Stand’ Desks in Vocational Education and Training

Author

Listed:
  • Mara Kirschner

    (Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Rianne H.J. Golsteijn

    (Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Sanne M. Sijben

    (Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Amika S. Singh

    (Mulier Institute, 3584 AA Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Hans H.C.M. Savelberg

    (Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE) and School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), FHML, Maastricht University, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Renate H.M. de Groot

    (Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

While it has been shown that interrupting a person’s sedentary behaviour has the potential to improve cognitive, physical and mental health, a large part of time that students spend in school is sedentary. As research has shown that approximately 80% of vocational education and training (VET) students have an unhealthy sedentary lifestyle, implementing “sit-to-stand” (StS) desks could interrupt sedentary behaviour and promote healthier behaviour. Therefore, the acceptability and feasibility of using such desks in the VET setting should be investigated. Using semi-structured focus group interviews analysed via deductive content analysis, the opinions of 33 students for the following topics were assessed: (1) usage of the standing option of the desks (2) reasons for standing in class (3) experienced effect of standing behind the desk, and (4) fostering future StS desks usage. Although VET students are aware of the potential benefits of using StS desks, they need to be actively stimulated and motivated by teachers to use them. In addition, time is needed to get into the habit of standing. Thus, for successful implementation of StS desks in the VET setting, all stakeholders (i.e., students, teachers, schoolboards) should be actively involved in stimulating the healthy behaviour of VET students.

Suggested Citation

  • Mara Kirschner & Rianne H.J. Golsteijn & Sanne M. Sijben & Amika S. Singh & Hans H.C.M. Savelberg & Renate H.M. de Groot, 2021. "A Qualitative Study of the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing ‘Sit-To-Stand’ Desks in Vocational Education and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:849-:d:483450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tetsuhiro Kidokoro & Yasuo Shimizu & Kanako Edamoto & Michael Annear, 2019. "Classroom Standing Desks and Time-Series Variation in Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity among Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Emiliano Mazzoli & Wei-Peng Teo & Jo Salmon & Caterina Pesce & Jason He & Tal Dotan Ben-Soussan & Lisa M. Barnett, 2019. "Associations of Class-Time Sitting, Stepping and Sit-to-Stand Transitions with Cognitive Functions and Brain Activity in Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Roberto M. Benzo & Allene L. Gremaud & Matthew Jerome & Lucas J. Carr, 2016. "Learning to Stand: The Acceptability and Feasibility of Introducing Standing Desks into College Classrooms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Ranjana K. Mehta & Ashley E. Shortz & Mark E. Benden, 2015. "Standing Up for Learning: A Pilot Investigation on the Neurocognitive Benefits of Stand-Biased School Desks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Benden, M.E. & Blake, J.J. & Wendel, M.L. & Huber, J.C., 2011. "The impact of stand-biased desks in classrooms on calorie expenditure in children," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(8), pages 1433-1436.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terry Guirado & Camille Chambonnière & Jean-Philippe Chaput & Lore Metz & David Thivel & Martine Duclos, 2021. "Effects of Classroom Active Desks on Children and Adolescents’ Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Academic Achievements and Overall Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-31, March.
    2. Katie R. Hosteng & Alison Phillips Reichter & Jacob E. Simmering & Lucas J. Carr, 2019. "Uninterrupted Classroom Sitting is Associated with Increased Discomfort and Sleepiness Among College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Paula Schwenke & Michaela Coenen, 2022. "Influence of Sit-Stand Tables in Classrooms on Children’s Sedentary Behavior and Teacher’s Acceptance and Feasibility: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Tetsuhiro Kidokoro & Yasuo Shimizu & Kanako Edamoto & Michael Annear, 2019. "Classroom Standing Desks and Time-Series Variation in Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity among Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Nathan R. Tokarek & Chi C. Cho & Scott J. Strath & Ann M. Swartz, 2022. "The Impact of Stand-Biased Desks on Afterschool Physical Activity Behaviors of Elementary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Ann M. Swartz & Nathan R. Tokarek & Scott J. Strath & Krista M. Lisdahl & Chi C. Cho, 2020. "Attentiveness and Fidgeting While Using a Stand-Biased Desk in Elementary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Katharina Wick & Oliver Faude & Susanne Manes & Lukas Zahner & Lars Donath, 2018. "I Can Stand Learning: A Controlled Pilot Intervention Study on the Effects of Increased Standing Time on Cognitive Function in Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Camille Bastien Tardif & Maude Cantin & Sylvain Sénécal & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Élise Labonté-Lemoyne & Mickael Begon & Marie-Eve Mathieu, 2018. "Implementation of Active Workstations in University Libraries—A Comparison of Portable Pedal Exercise Machines and Standing Desks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Ann M. Swartz & Nathan R. Tokarek & Krista Lisdahl & Hotaka Maeda & Scott J. Strath & Chi C. Cho, 2019. "Do Stand-Biased Desks in the Classroom Change School-Time Activity and Sedentary Behavior?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Tetsuhiro Kidokoro & Noriyuki Fuku & Toshio Yanagiya & Tomonari Takeshita & Mizuki Takaragawa & Michael Annear & Tian Xiaojie & Luka B. Waiganjo & Lamec F. Bogonko & Juliet K. Isika & Mbithe D. Kigaru, 2020. "Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Patterns among Kenyan and Japanese Children: A Comprehensive Cross-Country Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Hiroya Kono & Kento Furuta & Takumi Sakamoto & Shin-ya Ueda, 2023. "Effects of Standing after a Meal on Glucose Metabolism and Energy Expenditure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Yu-Ling Chen & Keith Tolfrey & Natalie Pearson & Daniel D. Bingham & Charlotte Edwardson & Lorraine Cale & David Dunstan & Sally E. Barber & Stacy A. Clemes, 2021. "Stand Out in Class: Investigating the Potential Impact of a Sit–Stand Desk Intervention on Children’s Sitting and Physical Activity during Class Time and after School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Roberto M. Benzo & Allene L. Gremaud & Matthew Jerome & Lucas J. Carr, 2016. "Learning to Stand: The Acceptability and Feasibility of Introducing Standing Desks into College Classrooms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Jolyn Ee & Sharon Parry & Beatriz IR de Oliveira & Joanne A. McVeigh & Erin Howie & Leon Straker, 2018. "Does a Classroom Standing Desk Intervention Modify Standing and Sitting Behaviour and Musculoskeletal Symptoms during School Time and Physical Activity during Waking Time?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Matthew S. Chrisman & Robert Wright & William Purdy, 2021. "College Classroom Instructors Can Effectively Promote Standing among Students Provided with Standing Desks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Joohyun Rhee & Mark E. Benden, 2019. "Stand-Biased Desk Intervention on Sleep Quality of High School Students: A Pilot Study Using Tri-Axial Accelerometery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Nirjhar Dutta & Gabriel A. Koepp & Steven D. Stovitz & James A. Levine & Mark A. Pereira, 2014. "Using Sit-Stand Workstations to Decrease Sedentary Time in Office Workers: A Randomized Crossover Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Maike Paulus & Jule Kunkel & Steffen C. E. Schmidt & Philip Bachert & Hagen Wäsche & Rainer Neumann & Alexander Woll, 2021. "Standing Breaks in Lectures Improve University Students’ Self-Perceived Physical, Mental, and Cognitive Condition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    19. Laura E. Finch & A. Janet Tomiyama & Andrew Ward, 2017. "Taking a Stand: The Effects of Standing Desks on Task Performance and Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Nastja Podrekar & Kaja Kastelic & Nejc Šarabon, 2020. "Teachers’ Perspective on Strategies to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Educational Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:849-:d:483450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.