IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6727-d828803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Sit-Stand Tables in Classrooms on Children’s Sedentary Behavior and Teacher’s Acceptance and Feasibility: A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Schwenke

    (Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology—IBE, Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, LMU Munich, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany
    Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany)

  • Michaela Coenen

    (Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology—IBE, Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, LMU Munich, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany
    Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Children spend over 70% of their school day sitting, most of the time in the classroom. Even when meeting physical activity guidelines but sitting for long uninterrupted periods, children are at risk of poorer health outcomes. With an approach to create an active learning environment through the implementation of sit-stand tables, this exploratory mixed-methods study aims to evaluate a holistic concept for reducing sedentary time in schools by implementing sit-stand tables as well as to examine the feasibility and didactic usability in classroom settings. Children from eight German schools aged 7 to 10 in primary schools and 11 to 13 in secondary schools ( n = 211), allocated into control and intervention groups, were included in the study, as well as teachers ( n = 13). An accelerometer was used as a quantitative measure to assess sitting and standing times and sport motoric tests were taken. Qualitative interviews were performed with teachers regarding feasibility and acceptance of the sit-stand tables. Independent t -test analysis adjusted for age, sex and school type found that sitting times of children in the intervention group could be reduced (by 30.54 min per school day of 6 h, p < 0.001) within all school and age levels. Overall, implementing sit-stand tables in classrooms serves as a feasible and effective opportunity to reduce sedentary behaviour and create an active learning environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Schwenke & Michaela Coenen, 2022. "Influence of Sit-Stand Tables in Classrooms on Children’s Sedentary Behavior and Teacher’s Acceptance and Feasibility: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6727-:d:828803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emiliano Mazzoli & Wei-Peng Teo & Jo Salmon & Caterina Pesce & Jason He & Tal Dotan Ben-Soussan & Lisa M. Barnett, 2019. "Associations of Class-Time Sitting, Stepping and Sit-to-Stand Transitions with Cognitive Functions and Brain Activity in Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Ann M. Swartz & Nathan R. Tokarek & Krista Lisdahl & Hotaka Maeda & Scott J. Strath & Chi C. Cho, 2019. "Do Stand-Biased Desks in the Classroom Change School-Time Activity and Sedentary Behavior?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Mark E. Benden & Hongwei Zhao & Christina E. Jeffrey & Monica L. Wendel & Jamilia J. Blake, 2014. "The Evaluation of the Impact of a Stand-Biased Desk on Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity for Elementary School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Yu-Ling Chen & Keith Tolfrey & Natalie Pearson & Daniel D. Bingham & Charlotte Edwardson & Lorraine Cale & David Dunstan & Sally E. Barber & Stacy A. Clemes, 2021. "Stand Out in Class: Investigating the Potential Impact of a Sit–Stand Desk Intervention on Children’s Sitting and Physical Activity during Class Time and after School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Ranjana K. Mehta & Ashley E. Shortz & Mark E. Benden, 2015. "Standing Up for Learning: A Pilot Investigation on the Neurocognitive Benefits of Stand-Biased School Desks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Ana María Contardo Ayala & Jo Salmon & Anna Timperio & Bronwyn Sudholz & Nicola D. Ridgers & Parneet Sethi & David W. Dunstan, 2016. "Impact of an 8-Month Trial Using Height-Adjustable Desks on Children’s Classroom Sitting Patterns and Markers of Cardio-Metabolic and Musculoskeletal Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathan R. Tokarek & Chi C. Cho & Scott J. Strath & Ann M. Swartz, 2022. "The Impact of Stand-Biased Desks on Afterschool Physical Activity Behaviors of Elementary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Terry Guirado & Camille Chambonnière & Jean-Philippe Chaput & Lore Metz & David Thivel & Martine Duclos, 2021. "Effects of Classroom Active Desks on Children and Adolescents’ Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Academic Achievements and Overall Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Ann M. Swartz & Nathan R. Tokarek & Scott J. Strath & Krista M. Lisdahl & Chi C. Cho, 2020. "Attentiveness and Fidgeting While Using a Stand-Biased Desk in Elementary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Mara Kirschner & Rianne H.J. Golsteijn & Sanne M. Sijben & Amika S. Singh & Hans H.C.M. Savelberg & Renate H.M. de Groot, 2021. "A Qualitative Study of the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing ‘Sit-To-Stand’ Desks in Vocational Education and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Ann M. Swartz & Nathan R. Tokarek & Krista Lisdahl & Hotaka Maeda & Scott J. Strath & Chi C. Cho, 2019. "Do Stand-Biased Desks in the Classroom Change School-Time Activity and Sedentary Behavior?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Alexander L. Wallace & Ann M. Swartz & Chi C. Cho & Christine M. Kaiver & Ryan M. Sullivan & Krista M. Lisdahl, 2022. "Stand-Biased Desks Impact on Cognition in Elementary Students Using a Within-Classroom Crossover Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, May.
    7. Aron P. Sherry & Natalie Pearson & Nicola D. Ridgers & William Johnson & Sally E. Barber & Daniel D. Bingham & Liana C. Nagy & Stacy A. Clemes, 2020. "Impacts of a Standing Desk Intervention within an English Primary School Classroom: A Pilot Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Tetsuhiro Kidokoro & Yasuo Shimizu & Kanako Edamoto & Michael Annear, 2019. "Classroom Standing Desks and Time-Series Variation in Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity among Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, May.
    9. Katharina Wick & Oliver Faude & Susanne Manes & Lukas Zahner & Lars Donath, 2018. "I Can Stand Learning: A Controlled Pilot Intervention Study on the Effects of Increased Standing Time on Cognitive Function in Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Ranjana K. Mehta & Ashley E. Shortz & Mark E. Benden, 2015. "Standing Up for Learning: A Pilot Investigation on the Neurocognitive Benefits of Stand-Biased School Desks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Yu-Ling Chen & Keith Tolfrey & Natalie Pearson & Daniel D. Bingham & Charlotte Edwardson & Lorraine Cale & David Dunstan & Sally E. Barber & Stacy A. Clemes, 2021. "Stand Out in Class: Investigating the Potential Impact of a Sit–Stand Desk Intervention on Children’s Sitting and Physical Activity during Class Time and after School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Katie R. Hosteng & Alison Phillips Reichter & Jacob E. Simmering & Lucas J. Carr, 2019. "Uninterrupted Classroom Sitting is Associated with Increased Discomfort and Sleepiness Among College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-10, July.
    13. Roberto M. Benzo & Allene L. Gremaud & Matthew Jerome & Lucas J. Carr, 2016. "Learning to Stand: The Acceptability and Feasibility of Introducing Standing Desks into College Classrooms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Nastja Podrekar & Kaja Kastelic & Nejc Šarabon, 2020. "Teachers’ Perspective on Strategies to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Educational Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Ana María Contardo Ayala & Jo Salmon & Anna Timperio & Bronwyn Sudholz & Nicola D. Ridgers & Parneet Sethi & David W. Dunstan, 2016. "Impact of an 8-Month Trial Using Height-Adjustable Desks on Children’s Classroom Sitting Patterns and Markers of Cardio-Metabolic and Musculoskeletal Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Jolyn Ee & Sharon Parry & Beatriz IR de Oliveira & Joanne A. McVeigh & Erin Howie & Leon Straker, 2018. "Does a Classroom Standing Desk Intervention Modify Standing and Sitting Behaviour and Musculoskeletal Symptoms during School Time and Physical Activity during Waking Time?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    17. Bruno P. Moura & Rogério L. Rufino & Ricardo C. Faria & Jeffer E. Sasaki & Paulo Roberto S. Amorim, 2019. "Can Replacing Sitting Time with Standing Time Improve Adolescents’ Cardiometabolic Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-10, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6727-:d:828803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.