IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9820-d638059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Home-Visit Nursing Agencies That Closed after the 2012 Fee Revision for Home-Visit Nursing Services: A Nationwide Panel Data Analysis in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Masayo Kashiwagi

    (Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

  • Noriko Morioka

    (Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

Abstract

Despite the 2012 fee revision raising fees for home-visit nursing services to increase their supply in Japan, 300 to 500 home-visit nursing agencies (VNA) are still being closed annually. This study aims to identify the regional and organizational characteristics of the VNAs that closed after the 2012 fee revision. A longitudinal observational study was conducted using nationwide panel data of VNAs from 2014 to 2017 (N = 6496). Multiple logistic regression models stratified by years of operation were used for the analysis. We identified 821 closed agencies (12.6%). In this study, many important factors related to VNA closures were found. In the less than three years group, there were regional factors (lower aging rate and larger number of clinics) and an organizational factor (higher proportion of users under 40 years of age). In the 3–14 years group, there was a regional factor (larger number of clinics) and organizational factors (smaller number of FTE nurses, smaller number of users per FTE nurse, and smaller number of medical care types that can be provided). In the over 15 years group, there was an organizational factor (smaller number of FTE nurses). The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers in avoiding VNA closures.

Suggested Citation

  • Masayo Kashiwagi & Noriko Morioka, 2021. "Characteristics of Home-Visit Nursing Agencies That Closed after the 2012 Fee Revision for Home-Visit Nursing Services: A Nationwide Panel Data Analysis in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9820-:d:638059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Allan & Julien Forder, 2015. "The Determinants of Care Home Closure," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24, pages 132-145, March.
    2. Stephen Allan & Julien Forder, 2015. "The Determinants of Care Home Closure," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 132-145, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Gaughan & Hugh Gravelle & Rita Santos & Luigi Siciliani, 2017. "Long-term care provision, hospital bed blocking, and discharge destination for hip fracture and stroke patients," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 311-331, September.
    2. Barron, David N. & West, Elizabeth, 2017. "The quasi-market for adult residential care in the UK: Do for-profit, not-for-profit or public sector residential care and nursing homes provide better quality care?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 137-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9820-:d:638059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.