IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9643-d634634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Spatial Dependency of the 2016–2017 Korean HPAI Outbreak to Determine the Effective Culling Radius

Author

Listed:
  • Kwideok Han

    (Department of Institutional Research and Analytics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Meilan An

    (Department of Food Industrial Management, Dongguk University, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Korea)

  • Inbae Ji

    (Department of Food Industrial Management, Dongguk University, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Korea)

Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks are a threat to human health and cause extremely large financial losses to the poultry industry due to containment measures. Determining the most effective control measures, especially the culling radius, to minimize economic impacts yet contain the spread of HPAI is of great importance. This study examines the factors influencing the probability of a farm being infected with HPAI during the 2016–2017 HPAI outbreak in Korea. Using a spatial random effects logistic model, only a few factors commonly associated with a higher risk of HPAI infection were significant. Interestingly, most density-related factors, poultry and farm, were not significantly associated with a higher risk of HPAI infection. The effective culling radius was determined to be two ranges: 0.5–2.2 km and 2.7–3.0 km. This suggests that the spatial heterogeneity, due to local characteristics and/or the characteristics of the HPAI virus(es) involved, should be considered to determine the most effective culling radius in each region. These findings will help strengthen biosecurity control measures at the farm level and enable authorities to quickly respond to HPAI outbreaks with effective countermeasures to suppress the spread of HPAI.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwideok Han & Meilan An & Inbae Ji, 2021. "Analyzing Spatial Dependency of the 2016–2017 Korean HPAI Outbreak to Determine the Effective Culling Radius," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9643-:d:634634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paciorek, Christopher J., 2007. "Computational techniques for spatial logistic regression with large data sets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3631-3653, May.
    2. An, Miran, 2019. "An Analysis of HPAI Risk Factors by Characteristics of Poultry Farm," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 42(3), September.
    3. Meilan An & Jeffrey Vitale & Kwideok Han & John N. Ng’ombe & Inbae Ji, 2021. "Effects of Spatial Characteristics on the Spread of the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vahid Tadayon & Mohammad Mehdi Saber, 2023. "A Spatial Logistic Regression Model Based on a Valid Skew-Gaussian Latent Field," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(1), pages 59-73, March.
    2. Gschlößl, Susanne & Czado, Claudia, 2008. "Does a Gibbs sampler approach to spatial Poisson regression models outperform a single site MH sampler?," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4184-4202, May.
    3. Sudipto Banerjee & Alan E. Gelfand & Andrew O. Finley & Huiyan Sang, 2008. "Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 825-848, September.
    4. Weimann, Amy & Dai, Dajun & Oni, Tolu, 2016. "A cross-sectional and spatial analysis of the prevalence of multimorbidity and its association with socioeconomic disadvantage in South Africa: A comparison between 2008 and 2012," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 144-156.
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:19:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dorota Młynarczyk & Carmen Armero & Virgilio Gómez-Rubio & Pedro Puig, 2021. "Bayesian Analysis of Population Health Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Andrew O. Finley & Sudipto Banerjee & Patrik Waldmann & Tore Ericsson, 2009. "Hierarchical Spatial Modeling of Additive and Dominance Genetic Variance for Large Spatial Trial Datasets," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 441-451, June.
    8. Qian Ren & Sudipto Banerjee, 2013. "Hierarchical Factor Models for Large Spatially Misaligned Data: A Low-Rank Predictive Process Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 19-30, March.
    9. Brian J. Reich & Montserrat Fuentes & Amy H. Herring & Kelly R. Evenson, 2010. "Bayesian Variable Selection for Multivariate Spatially Varying Coefficient Regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 772-782, September.
    10. Berrett, Candace & Calder, Catherine A., 2012. "Data augmentation strategies for the Bayesian spatial probit regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 478-490.
    11. Zoe Gibbs & Chris Groendyke & Brian Hartman & Robert Richardson, 2020. "Modeling County-Level Spatio-Temporal Mortality Rates Using Dynamic Linear Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Jo Eidsvik & Sara Martino & Håvard Rue, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian Inference in Spatial Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Ren, Qian & Banerjee, Sudipto & Finley, Andrew O. & Hodges, James S., 2011. "Variational Bayesian methods for spatial data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3197-3217, December.
    14. Liang, Shengde & Banerjee, Sudipto & Bushhouse, Sally & Finley, Andrew O. & Carlin, Bradley P., 2008. "Hierarchical multiresolution approaches for dense point-level breast cancer treatment data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2650-2668, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9643-:d:634634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.