IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9477-d631482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Training with Different Modes of Strength Intervention on Psychosocial Disorders in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Barahona-Fuentes

    (Department Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
    Grupo de Investigación en Salud, Actividad Física y Deporte ISAFYD, Universidad de Las Américas, Sede Viña del Mar 2531098, Chile)

  • Álvaro Huerta Ojeda

    (Grupo de Investigación en Salud, Actividad Física y Deporte ISAFYD, Universidad de Las Américas, Sede Viña del Mar 2531098, Chile)

  • Luis Chirosa-Ríos

    (Department Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Physical exercise has a positive impact on anxiety and depression. However, the evidence that associates strength training with a decrease in adolescents’ psychosocial disorders is scarce. Consequently, the objective was to analyze the effects of training with different modes of strength intervention on anxiety, stress, and depression in adolescents. The search was designed according to PRISMA ® . We searched WoS, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, PubMed, and MEDLINE (2010–2020). Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration. The analysis was carried out with a standardized mean difference (SMD) pooled using the Hedges g test (95% CI). The Main Outcome Measures were: anxiety, stress, and depression in adolescents post strength training. Nine studies were included in the systematic review and seven in the meta-analysis. These studies showed a large and significant effect of strength training on anxiety (SMD = −1.75; CI = 95%: −3.03, −0.48; p = 0.007) and depression (SMD = −1.61; CI = 95%: −2.54, −0.67, p = 0.0007). In conclusion, training with different modes of strength intervention have shown control over anxiety and depression in adolescents. However, conventional strength training seems to have better results than other modes of strength intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Barahona-Fuentes & Álvaro Huerta Ojeda & Luis Chirosa-Ríos, 2021. "Effects of Training with Different Modes of Strength Intervention on Psychosocial Disorders in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9477-:d:631482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9477/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9477/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lara Carneiro & José Afonso & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Eugenia Murawska-Ciałowciz & Adilson Marques & Filipe Manuel Clemente, 2020. "The Effects of Exclusively Resistance Training-Based Supervised Programs in People with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Hugh Waddington & Edoardo Masset & Emmanuel Jimenez, 2018. "What have we learned after ten years of systematic reviews in international development?," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo & Victor Hugo de Oliveira & Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros & Ádala Nayana de Sousa Mata & Daniel Ángel García & Daniel Guillén Martínez & José Carlos Leit, 2020. "The Effects of Exercise on BDNF Levels in Adolescents: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aija Klavina & Viktors Veliks & Inta Gulevska & Aleksandrs Aniscenko & Juris Porozovs & Anna Zusa, 2022. "Partly and Fully Supervised Physical Exercise Effects on Cognitive Functions and Movement Proficiency of Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Gustavo Api & Rosimeide Francisco dos Santos Legnani & Diogo Bertella Foschiera & Filipe Manuel Clemente & Elto Legnani, 2023. "Influence of Cluster Sets on Mechanical and Perceptual Variables in Adolescent Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Falonn Contreras-Osorio & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Enrique Cerda-Vega & Rodrigo Campos-Jara & Cristian Martínez-Salazar & Rafael E. Reigal & Verónica Morales-Sanchez & Sergio Araya Sierralta & Chris, 2022. "Effects of Physical Exercise on Executive Function in Adults with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Johannes Burdack & Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn, 2022. "Cognitive Enhancement through Differential Rope Skipping after Math Lesson," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Klimas Patrycja & Stańczyk Sylwia & Sachpazidu Karina, 2023. "A Multipath Development Framework for Inter-Organizational Relationships: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 59(2), pages 33-52, June.
    4. Falonn Contreras-Osorio & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Enrique Cerda-Vega & Rodrigo Campos-Jara & Cristian Martínez-Salazar & Rafael E. Reigal & Antonio Hernández-Mendo & Lara Carneiro & Christian Campo, 2022. "Effects of Physical Exercise on Executive Function in Adults with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Davidson, Angus Alexander & Young, Michael Denis & Leake, John Espie & O’Connor, Patrick, 2022. "Aid and forgetting the enemy: A systematic review of the unintended consequences of international development in fragile and conflict-affected situations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9477-:d:631482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.