IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8818-d618822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mind the Differences: How Diagnoses and Hospital Characteristics Influence Coordination in Cancer Patient Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Per Magnus Mæhle

    (Department of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0314 Oslo, Norway
    Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway)

  • Ingrid Kristine Small Hanto

    (Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway)

  • Victoria Charlotte Simensen

    (Department of Research Support-Clinical Trial Unit (CTU), Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway)

  • Sigbjørn Smeland

    (Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
    Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

Integrated care pathway (ICP) is a prevailing concept in health care management including cancer care. Though substantial research has been conducted on ICPs knowledge is still deficient explaining how characteristics of diagnose, applied procedures, patient group and organizational context influence specific practicing of ICPs. We studied how coordination takes place in three cancer pathways in four Norwegian hospitals. We identified how core contextual variables of cancer pathways affect complexity and predictability of the performance of each pathway. Thus, we also point at differences in core preconditions for accomplishing coordination of the cancer pathways. In addition, the findings show that three different types of coordination dynamics are present in all three pathways to a divergent degree: programmed chains, consultative hubs and problem-solving webs. Pathway coordination also depends on hierarchical interaction. Lack of corresponding roles in the medical–professional and the administrative–institutional logics presents a challenge for coordination, both within and between hospitals. We recommend that further improvement of specific ICPs by paying attention to what should be standardized and what should be kept flexible, aligning semi-formal and formal structures to pathway processes and identify the professional cancer related background and management style required by the key-roles in pathway management.

Suggested Citation

  • Per Magnus Mæhle & Ingrid Kristine Small Hanto & Victoria Charlotte Simensen & Sigbjørn Smeland, 2021. "Mind the Differences: How Diagnoses and Hospital Characteristics Influence Coordination in Cancer Patient Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8818-:d:618822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8818/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8818/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul K. J. Han & William M. P. Klein & Neeraj K. Arora, 2011. "Varieties of Uncertainty in Health Care," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(6), pages 828-838, November.
    2. Turner, J. Rodney & Keegan, Anne, 2001. "Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:: Roles of the broker and steward," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 254-267, June.
    3. Per Magnus Mæhle & Ingrid Kristine Small Hanto & Sigbjørn Smeland, 2020. "Practicing Integrated Care Pathways in Norwegian Hospitals: Coordination through Industrialized Standardization, Value Chains, and Quality Management or an Organizational Equivalent to Improvised Jazz," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Per Magnus Mæhle & Senada Hajdarevic & Erna Håland & Rikke Aarhus & Sigbjørn Smeland & Bjørn Erik Mørk, 2021. "Exploring the triggering process of a cancer care reform in three Scandinavian countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 2231-2247, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ping Yung, 2015. "A new institutional economic theory of project management," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 228-243, February.
    2. Javier Urquizo & Carlos Calderón & Philip James, 2017. "Using a Local Framework Combining Principal Component Regression and Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of a Domestic Energy Model in Sub-City Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Robin Gregory & Ralph L. Keeney, 2017. "A Practical Approach to Address Uncertainty in Stakeholder Deliberations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 487-501, March.
    4. Embuldeniya, Gayathri & Gutberg, Jennifer & Sibbald, Shannon S. & Wodchis, Walter P., 2021. "The beginnings of health system transformation: How Ontario Health Teams are implementing change in the context of uncertainty," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(12), pages 1543-1549.
    5. Fereshteh Ghahramani & Jingguo Wang, 2020. "Impact of Smartphones on Quality of Life: A Health Information Behavior Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1275-1290, December.
    6. Cezar-Petre SIMION & Stefan Catalin POPA, 2017. "Evolution Of Research In Project Management. An Analysis Of The Research Results Published In The Period 1999-2017," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 956-964, November.
    7. Birgit Leick & Susanne Gretzinger, 2018. "Brokerage and governance for business networks: a metasynthesis-based discussion," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 773-804, December.
    8. Merluzzi, Thomas V. & Salamanca-Balen, Natalia & Philip, Errol J. & Salsman, John M., 2023. "“Letting go” - Relinquishing control of illness outcomes to God and quality of life: Meaning/peace as a mediating mechanism in religious coping with cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:849-882 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Boumali Badr-Eddine & Tamine Rachid, 2022. "The Governance Effect on the Performance of an Urban Project," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 36(1), pages 34-54, January.
    11. Scherr, Courtney L. & Getachew-Smith, Hannah J. & Sudec, Laura & Brooks, John J. & Roberts, Megan, 2020. "Parents’ sensemaking processes in the identification of developmental delays and engagement with early intervention services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Matt Andrews, 2022. "Getting Real about Unknowns in Complex Policy Work," CID Working Papers 406, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    13. Maria Kapsali, 2013. "Equifinality in Project Management Exploring Causal Complexity in Projects," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 2-14, January.
    14. Stephen Wood & George Michaelides & Kevin Daniels & Karen Niven, 2022. "Uncertainty and Well-Being amongst Homeworkers in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study of University Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Xavier Romão & Esmeralda Paupério, 2016. "A framework to assess quality and uncertainty in disaster loss data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 1077-1102, September.
    16. Guan Jiancheng & Wang Junxia, 2004. "Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(1), pages 131-155, January.
    17. Eugenia Cacciatori, 2004. "Organisational Memory and Innovation Across Projects: Integrated Service Provision in Engineering Design Firms," SPRU Working Paper Series 117, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    18. Marek Kasperek & Monika Odlanicka-Poczobutt, 2021. "The Etiology of Formation and Reacting Way to a Change in the Supply Chain," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 915-947.
    19. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:849-882 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Lise Saffran & Sisi Hu & Amanda Hinnant & Laura D Scherer & Susan C Nagel, 2020. "Constructing and influencing perceived authenticity in science communication: Experimenting with narrative," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    21. Costa, Nathalia & Mescouto, Karime & Dillon, Miriam & Olson, Rebecca & Butler, Prudence & Forbes, Roma & Setchell, Jenny, 2022. "The ubiquity of uncertainty in low back pain care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    22. Hillen, Marij A. & Gutheil, Caitlin M. & Strout, Tania D. & Smets, Ellen M.A. & Han, Paul K.J., 2017. "Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 62-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8818-:d:618822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.