IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5807-d564362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Representations of Free-Living and Unrestrained Dogs as an Emerging Public Health Issue in Australian Newspapers

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Degeling

    (Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia)

  • Julie Hall

    (Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia)

  • Lily M. van Eeden

    (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Summer M. Finlay

    (School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia)

  • Suk Maya Gurung

    (School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia)

  • Victoria J. Brookes

    (School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
    Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia)

Abstract

That dogs can live and breed as free-living animals contributes to public health risks including zoonotic transmission, dog bites, and compromising people’s sense of safety in public spaces. In Australia, free-living dog populations are comprised of domestic dogs, dingoes, and dog–dingo hybrids, and are described using various terms (for example, stray or community), depending on social or geographic context. Urban expansion and regional migration mean that risks associated with contact between humans and free-living dogs are increasing. Public health authorities, local governments, and community organisations have called for transdisciplinary partnerships to address dog-related health risks with a sustainable long-term approach. Values pluralism and a lack of sustained community engagement in affected areas have meant that the outcome of such efforts to date has been mixed. To identify ideas in public circulation about the impact of unrestrained and free-living dogs on human health and well-being, and understand the framework through which these animals are problematised and solutions are proposed in public discourse, we systematically examined coverage of these issues in print media. Our analyses indicate that reporting in Australian newspapers tends to frame the public health impacts of free-living dogs as problems of public order requiring direct government action to re-establish control. The public health impacts of free-living dog populations in Australia have complex causes that intersect at the nexus between human and canine behaviour, agricultural and land management practices, local bylaws, and efforts to conserve ecological systems. Placing responsibility on governments limits opportunities for greater community involvement in developing integrated One Health approaches. Better-quality evidence of the impacts of dog populations on community health and well-being, and broad community support are needed to reshape public debates on animal control, which, ultimately, will promote more effective approaches to mitigate dog-related public health risks at the human–animal–environment interface.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Degeling & Julie Hall & Lily M. van Eeden & Summer M. Finlay & Suk Maya Gurung & Victoria J. Brookes, 2021. "Representations of Free-Living and Unrestrained Dogs as an Emerging Public Health Issue in Australian Newspapers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5807-:d:564362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gollust, S.E. & Lantz, P.M. & Ubel, P.A., 2009. "The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(12), pages 2160-2167.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Jiawei & Niederdeppe, Jeff, 2024. "Effects of communicating health disparities using social comparison framing: A comprehensive review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    2. Thu T. Nguyen & Weijun Yu & Junaid S. Merchant & Shaniece Criss & Chris J. Kennedy & Heran Mane & Krishik N. Gowda & Melanie Kim & Ritu Belani & Caitlin F. Blanco & Manvitha Kalachagari & Xiaohe Yue &, 2023. "Examining Exposure to Messaging, Content, and Hate Speech from Partisan News Social Media Posts on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Degeling, Chris & Kerridge, Ian, 2013. "Hendra in the news: Public policy meets public morality in times of zoonotic uncertainty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 156-163.
    4. Aisha Lofters & Morgan Slater & Maritt Kirst & Ketan Shankardass & Carlos Quiñonez, 2014. "How Do People Attribute Income-Related Inequalities in Health? A Cross-Sectional Study in Ontario, Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, January.
    5. Christopher E. Clarke & Jeff Niederdeppe & Helen C. Lundell, 2012. "Narratives and Images Used by Public Communication Campaigns Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Rowbotham, Samantha & McKinnon, Merryn & Marks, Leah & Hawe, Penelope, 2019. "Research on media framing of public policies to prevent chronic disease: A narrative synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Olaf von dem Knesebeck & Nico Vonneilich & Tae Jun Kim, 2018. "Public awareness of poverty as a determinant of health: survey results from 23 countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(2), pages 165-172, March.
    8. Chien Thang Pham & Trang Ta Thi Nguyet, 2022. "Using Media to Influence Consumer Attitudes to Domestic Goods in Vietnam by Framing Public Interest: A Media Framing Effect Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    9. Wändi Bruine de Bruin & Htay-Wah Saw & Dana P. Goldman, 2020. "Political polarization in US residents’ COVID-19 risk perceptions, policy preferences, and protective behaviors," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 177-194, October.
    10. Spencer Moore, 2010. "From awareness to action on the social determinants of health," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(6), pages 521-522, December.
    11. Haoran Chu & Janet Yang, 2020. "Their Economy and Our Health: Communicating Climate Change to the Divided American Public," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Embrett, Mark G. & Randall, G.E., 2014. "Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: Exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 147-155.
    13. Nick Bellissimo & Gillie Gabay & Attila Gere & Michaela Kucab & Howard Moskowitz, 2020. "Containing COVID-19 by Matching Messages on Social Distancing to Emergent Mindsets—The Case of North America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-10, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5807-:d:564362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.