IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1707-d328946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Longitudinal Analysis of Plantar Pressures with Wear of a Running Shoe

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Escamilla-Martínez

    (University Clinic of Podiatry CPUEX, University of Extremadura, Centro Universitario de Plasencia, Avda, Virgen del Puerto 2, 10600 Plasencia, Spain
    Nursing Department, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Beatriz Gómez-Martín

    (University Clinic of Podiatry CPUEX, University of Extremadura, Centro Universitario de Plasencia, Avda, Virgen del Puerto 2, 10600 Plasencia, Spain
    Nursing Department, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Lourdes María Fernández-Seguín

    (Physiotherapy Department, University of Sevilla, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Alfonso Martínez-Nova

    (University Clinic of Podiatry CPUEX, University of Extremadura, Centro Universitario de Plasencia, Avda, Virgen del Puerto 2, 10600 Plasencia, Spain
    Nursing Department, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Juan Diego Pedrera-Zamorano

    (Nursing Department, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Raquel Sánchez-Rodríguez

    (University Clinic of Podiatry CPUEX, University of Extremadura, Centro Universitario de Plasencia, Avda, Virgen del Puerto 2, 10600 Plasencia, Spain
    Nursing Department, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

Abstract

Running shoes typically have a lifespan of 300–1000 km, and the plantar pressure pattern during running may change as the shoe wears. So, the aim of this study was to determine the variation of plantar pressures with shoe wear, and the runner’s subjective sensation. Maximun Plantar Pressures (MMP) were measured from 33 male recreational runners at three times during a training season (beginning, 350 km, and 700 km) using the Biofoot/IBV ® in-shoe system (Biofoot/IBV ® , Valencia, Spain). All the runners wore the same shoes (New Balance ® 738, Boston, MA, USA) during this period, and performed similar training. The zones supporting most pressure at all three study times were the medial (inner) column of the foot and the forefoot. There was a significant increase in pressure on the midfoot over the course of the training season (from 387.8 to 590 kPa, p = 0.003). The runners who felt the worst cushioning under the midfoot were those who had the highest peak pressures in that area ( p = 0.002). The New Balance ® 738 running shoe effectively maintains the plantar pressure pattern after 700 km of use under all the zones studied except the midfoot, probably due to material fatigue or deficits of the specific cushioning systems in that area.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Escamilla-Martínez & Beatriz Gómez-Martín & Lourdes María Fernández-Seguín & Alfonso Martínez-Nova & Juan Diego Pedrera-Zamorano & Raquel Sánchez-Rodríguez, 2020. "Longitudinal Analysis of Plantar Pressures with Wear of a Running Shoe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1707-:d:328946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel E. Lieberman & Madhusudhan Venkadesan & William A. Werbel & Adam I. Daoud & Susan D’Andrea & Irene S. Davis & Robert Ojiambo Mang’Eni & Yannis Pitsiladis, 2010. "Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7280), pages 531-535, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Rubio-Peirotén & Felipe García-Pinillos & Diego Jaén-Carrillo & Antonio Cartón-Llorente & Ferrán Abat & Luis E. Roche-Seruendo, 2021. "Relationship between Connective Tissue Morphology and Lower-Limb Stiffness in Endurance Runners. A Prospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Chao-Fu Chen & Hui-Ju Wu & Chao Liu & Soun-Cheng Wang, 2022. "Kinematics Analysis of Male Runners via Forefoot and Rearfoot Strike Strategies: A Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Felipe García-Pinillos & Diego Jaén-Carrillo & Pedro Ángel Latorre-Román & Carles Escalona-Marfil & Víctor M. Soto-Hermoso & Carlos Lago-Fuentes & Silvia Pueyo-Villa & Irma Domínguez-Azpíroz & Luis E., 2021. "Does Arch Stiffness Influence Running Spatiotemporal Parameters? An Analysis of the Relationship between Influencing Factors on Running Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-9, March.
    4. Andrigo Zaar & Eduardo Borba Neves & Abel Ilah Rouboa & Victor Machado Reis, 2017. "Determinative Factors in The Injury Incidence on Runners: Synthesis of Evidence “Injuries on Runners”," The Open Sports Sciences Journal, Bentham Open, vol. 10(1), pages 294-304, December.
    5. Ying-Jen Lai & Willy Chou & I-Hua Chu & Yu-Lin Wang & Yi-Jing Lin & Shihfan Jack Tu & Lan-Yuen Guo, 2020. "Will the Foot Strike Pattern Change at Different Running Speeds with or without Wearing Shoes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Ana Marchena-Rodriguez & Ana Belen Ortega-Avila & Pablo Cervera-Garvi & David Cabello-Manrique & Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron, 2020. "Review of Terms and Definitions Used in Descriptions of Running Shoes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Ana Paula da Silva Azevedo & Bruno Mezêncio & Alberto Carlos Amadio & Julio Cerca Serrão, 2016. "16 Weeks of Progressive Barefoot Running Training Changes Impact Force and Muscle Activation in Habitual Shod Runners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Koji Nishida & Shota Hagio & Benio Kibushi & Toshio Moritani & Motoki Kouzaki, 2017. "Comparison of muscle synergies for running between different foot strike patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Christian Mitschke & Falk Zaumseil & Thomas L. Milani, 2017. "The influence of inertial sensor sampling frequency on the accuracy of measurement parameters in rearfoot running," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(14), pages 1502-1511, October.
    10. Niki M Stolwijk & Jacques Duysens & Jan Willem K Louwerens & Yvonne HM van de Ven & Noël LW Keijsers, 2013. "Flat Feet, Happy Feet? Comparison of the Dynamic Plantar Pressure Distribution and Static Medial Foot Geometry between Malawian and Dutch Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    11. Patrick Devlieger & Jori De Coster, 2017. "On Footwear and Disability: A Dance of Animacy?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Yang Yang & Xini Zhang & Zhen Luo & Xi Wang & Dongqiang Ye & Weijie Fu, 2020. "Alterations in Running Biomechanics after 12 Week Gait Retraining with Minimalist Shoes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Xinyan Jiang & Huiyu Zhou & Wenjing Quan & Qiuli Hu & Julien S. Baker & Yaodong Gu, 2021. "Ground Reaction Force Differences between Bionic Shoes and Neutral Running Shoes in Recreational Male Runners before and after a 5 km Run," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Enrico Santoro & Antonio Tessitore & Chiang Liu & Chi-Hsien Chen & Chutimon Khemtong & Mauro Mandorino & Yi-Hua Lee & Giancarlo Condello, 2021. "The Biomechanical Characterization of the Turning Phase during a 180° Change of Direction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1707-:d:328946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.