IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8914-d454065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral Sensitivity, Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: Implications for Humanization of Nursing Care

Author

Listed:
  • Iván Suazo

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500912, Chile)

  • María del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
    Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Politécnica y Artística del Paraguay, Asunción 1628, Paraguay)

  • María del Mar Molero Jurado

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • África Martos Martínez

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • María del Mar Simón Márquez

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Ana Belén Barragán Martín

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Maria Sisto

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • José Jesús Gázquez Linares

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500912, Chile)

Abstract

Humanization of nursing is related to certain social and moral variables. Moral sensitivity, empathy, and prosocial behavior help understand a situation and make decisions that benefit the patient. The objective of this study is to find out how these variables are related, and define the differences in moral sensitivity, empathy, and prosocial behavior in humanization of nursing. We also analyzed the mediating role of empathy in the relationship between moral sensitivity and prosocial behavior. The sample was made up of 330 Spanish nurses aged 22 to 56, who completed the HUMAS Scale and adapted versions of the Basic Empathy Scale, the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, and the Prosocial Behavior Scale. Descriptive analyses, bivariate correlations and multiple mediation models were calculated. The results found significantly different mean scores between all the groups in responsibility and moral strength, cognitive empathy, and prosocial behavior, and in moral burden, the differences were in the high-humanization-score group compared to the low-score group. Furthermore, the mediation models showed the mediating effect of cognitive empathy between the responsibility, strength, and moral burden factors on prosocial behavior, but not of affective empathy. The study concluded that humanization in nursing is closely related to moral sensitivity, cognitive empathy, and prosocial behavior. This facilitates a helping, caring, and understanding attitude toward patient needs, but without the affective flooding that affective empathy can lead to.

Suggested Citation

  • Iván Suazo & María del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes & María del Mar Molero Jurado & África Martos Martínez & María del Mar Simón Márquez & Ana Belén Barragán Martín & Maria Sisto & José Jesús Gázquez Linares, 2020. "Moral Sensitivity, Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: Implications for Humanization of Nursing Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8914-:d:454065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruttan, Rachel L. & Lucas, Brian J., 2018. "Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 47-58.
    2. María del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes & Iván Herera-Peco & María del Mar Molero Jurado & Nieves Fátima Oropesa Ruiz & Diego Ayuso-Murillo & José Jesús Gázquez Linares, 2019. "The Development and Validation of the Healthcare Professional Humanization Scale (HUMAS) for Nursing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiyu Yi & Qianbao Tan & Jiahui Liu & Fuqun Liang & Chao Liu & Zhenbiao Yin, 2022. "The Mechanism of Cumulative Ecological Risk Affecting College Students’ Sense of Social Responsibility: The Double Fugue Effect of Belief in a Just World and Empathy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes & María del Mar Molero Jurado & África Martos Martínez & Elena Fernández-Martínez & Raquel Franco Valenzuela & Iván Herrera-Peco & Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez & Inmaculada M, 2020. "Design and Validation of the Adaptation to Change Questionnaire: New Realities in Times of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Michaela Hausdorf, 2024. "What You Get Is What You See—The Mutual Relationships between Images of Human Nature and Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Raquel Herrero-Hahn & Rafael Montoya-Juárez & César Hueso-Montoro & Celia Martí-García & Diego Alejandro Salazar-Blandón & María Paz García-Caro, 2019. "Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Analysis of the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale for Use with Spanish Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Pascal Oliver Heßler & Jella Pfeiffer & Sebastian Hafenbrädl, 2022. "When Self-Humanization Leads to Algorithm Aversion," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 275-292, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8914-:d:454065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.