IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i16p5841-d398014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ Non-Medical and Organizational Needs during Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Osowiecka

    (Department of Psychology and Sociology of Health and Public Health, School of Public Health, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Al. Warszawska 30, 11-041 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Radoslaw Sroda

    (Department of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Al. Wojska Polskiego 37, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Arian Saied

    (Department of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Al. Wojska Polskiego 37, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Marek Szwiec

    (Department of Surgery and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Gora, Ul. Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Gora, Poland)

  • Sarah Mangold

    (Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Ul. Ceglana 35, 40-515 Katowice, Poland)

  • Dominika Osuch

    (Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Ul. Ceglana 35, 40-515 Katowice, Poland)

  • Sergiusz Nawrocki

    (Department of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Al. Wojska Polskiego 37, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Monika Rucinska

    (Department of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Al. Wojska Polskiego 37, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine non-medical and organizational needs among cancer patients during diagnosis and treatment. The study included 384 cancer patients treated in five oncological centers in Poland. A questionnaire designed for the study was used. Most of the patients received psychological support from their partner/family/friends (88%), to a lesser extent from a psychologist (21%) and priests (4%). Forty-three percent of patients received social support from their partner/family/friends and only 7% of respondents received support from a social worker. Most patients stated they would like to have a professional who would help them with their non-medical problems during the diagnostic process and cancer treatment. The youth, with a higher education level who were professionally active and living in cities seemed to be more aware of their needs. Improvements to the oncological system in Poland should focus on expanding patient access to professional support of non-medical needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Osowiecka & Radoslaw Sroda & Arian Saied & Marek Szwiec & Sarah Mangold & Dominika Osuch & Sergiusz Nawrocki & Monika Rucinska, 2020. "Patients’ Non-Medical and Organizational Needs during Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5841-:d:398014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karolina Osowiecka & Monika Rucinska & Jacek J. Nowakowski & Sergiusz Nawrocki, 2018. "How Long Are Cancer Patients Waiting for Oncological Therapy in Poland?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Meredith, Philip, 1993. "Patient satisfaction with communication in general surgery: Problems of measurement and improvement," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 591-602, September.
    3. Guadagnoli, Edward & Ward, Patricia, 1998. "Patient participation in decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 329-339, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Karasiewicz & Ewelina Chawłowska & Agnieszka Lipiak & Barbara Więckowska, 2021. "A Step towards Understanding and Tackling Health Inequalities: The Use of Secondary Prevention Services and the Need for Health Promotion in a Rural Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Karolina Osowiecka & Anna Kieszkowska-Grudny & Radosław Środa & Dominik Olejniczak & Monika Rucińska, 2022. "Identification of Cognitive Strategies Used by Cancer Patients as a Basis for Psychological Self-Support during Oncological Therapy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Dominik Olejniczak & Paulina Mularczyk-Tomczewska & Krzysztof Klimiuk & Agata Olearczyk & Aleksandra Kielan & Anna Staniszewska & Karolina Osowiecka, 2022. "Coping with Stress in Neoplastic Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karnieli-Miller, Orit & Eisikovits, Zvi, 2009. "Physician as partner or salesman? Shared decision-making in real-time encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 1-8, July.
    2. Lim, Jennifer N.W. & Edlin, Richard, 2009. "Preferences of older patients and choice of treatment location in the UK: A binary choice experiment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 252-257, August.
    3. Bin Ding & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Dongxiao Gu & Fang Bian & Xuefeng Shao, 2019. "Effect of Patient Participation on Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Inpatient Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Susan Randles Moscato & Barbara Valanis & Christina M. Gullion & Christine Tanner & Susan E. Shapiro & Shigeko Izumi, 2007. "Predictors of Patient Satisfaction With Telephone Nursing Services," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 119-137, May.
    5. Magdalena Konieczny & Elżbieta Cipora & Jolanta Sawicka & Andrzej Fal, 2021. "Patient Satisfaction with Oncological Care during the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Landmark, Anne Marie Dalby & Svennevig, Jan & Gulbrandsen, Pål, 2016. "Negotiating treatment preferences: Physicians' formulations of patients' stance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 26-36.
    7. Entwistle, Vikki & Williams, Brian & Skea, Zoe & MacLennan, Graeme & Bhattacharya, Siladitya, 2006. "Which surgical decisions should patients participate in and how? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about variants of hysterectomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 499-509, January.
    8. Werner, Perla & Vered, Iris, 2002. "Women's knowledge of new regulations about publicly funded medications for osteoporosis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 275-284, June.
    9. Timmermans, Stefan & Tietbohl, Caroline, 2018. "Fifty years of sociological leadership at Social Science and Medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 209-215.
    10. Karolina Osowiecka & Sergiusz Nawrocki & Marcin Kurowicki & Monika Rucinska, 2019. "The Waiting Time of Prostate Cancer Patients in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-8, January.
    11. Johnstone, Megan-Jane & Kanitsaki, Olga, 2009. "Engaging patients as safety partners: Some considerations for ensuring a culturally and linguistically appropriate approach," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 1-7, April.
    12. Saima Ghazal & Edward T. Cokely & Rocio Garcia-Retamero, 2014. "Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(1), pages 15-34, January.
    13. O' Donnell, Máire & Monz, Brigitta & Hunskaar, Steinar, 2007. "General preferences for involvement in treatment decision making among European women with urinary incontinence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 1914-1924, May.
    14. Fraser, Suzanne & Fomiatti, Renae & Moore, David & Seear, Kate & Aitken, Campbell, 2020. "Is another relationship possible? Connoisseurship and the doctor–patient relationship for men who consume performance and image-enhancing drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Bugge, Carol & Entwistle, Vikki A. & Watt, Ian S., 2006. "The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2065-2078, October.
    16. Francisco José García-Sánchez & Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno & Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín, 2019. "Patients’ and Caregivers’ Conceptualisations of Pressure Ulcers and the Process of Decision-Making in the Context of Home Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Mariusz Duplaga, 2016. "Searching for a Role of Nursing Personnel in Developing Landscape of Ehealth: Factors Determining Attitudes toward Key Patient Empowering Applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Moumjid, Nora & Charles, Cathy & Morelle, Magali & Gafni, Amiram & Brémond, Alain & Farsi, Fadila & Whelan, Tim & Carrère, Marie-Odile, 2009. "The statutory duty of physicians to inform patients versus unmet patients' information needs: The case of breast cancer in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 162-173, July.
    20. Jan Florin & Anna Ehrenberg & Margareta Ehnfors, 2006. "Patient participation in clinical decision‐making in nursing: a comparative study of nurses’ and patients’ perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(12), pages 1498-1508, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5841-:d:398014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.