IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3702-d362335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preconception Care in a Remote Aboriginal Community Context: What, When and by Whom?

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Griffiths

    (The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, WA 6725, Australia
    Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome, WA 6725, Australia)

  • Julia V Marley

    (The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, WA 6725, Australia
    Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, Broome, WA 6725, Australia)

  • David Atkinson

    (The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, WA 6725, Australia)

Abstract

Preconception care (PCC) is acknowledged as a vital preventive health measure aiming to promote health today and for subsequent generations. We aimed to describe the content and context of PCC delivery in a very remote Australian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service setting. A retrospective audit was undertaken to identify what PCC was delivered between 2011 and 2018 to 127 Aboriginal women who had at least one pregnancy during this period. Of 177 confirmed pregnancies, 121 had received PCC prior to the pregnancy. Sexually transmissible infection screening (71%) was the most common care delivered, followed by folic acid prescription (57%) and smoking cessation support (43%). Younger women received PCC less often, particularly screening for modifiable pregnancy risk factors. Rates of prediabetes/diabetes, albuminuria, overweight/obesity and smoking were high amongst those screened (48–60%). PCC was usually patient-initiated and increased significantly over the audit period. Presentation for antenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy was high at 73%. Opportunities to increase PCC delivery include integration with routine health checks, pregnancy tests and chronic disease programs. PCC programs codesigned with young people are also recommended. All primary care providers should be supported and assisted to provide opportunistic PCC and health promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Griffiths & Julia V Marley & David Atkinson, 2020. "Preconception Care in a Remote Aboriginal Community Context: What, When and by Whom?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3702-:d:362335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laxsini Murugesu & Miriam E. Hopman & Sabine F. Van Voorst & Ageeth N. Rosman & Mirjam P. Fransen, 2019. "Systematic Development of Materials for Inviting Low Health-Literate Individuals to Participate in Preconception Counseling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Higgins, J.A. & Kramer, R.D. & Ryder, K.M., 2016. "Provider bias in long-Acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: Perceptions of young adult women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(11), pages 1932-1937.
    3. Stevens, Lindsay M., 2015. "Planning parenthood: Health care providers' perspectives on pregnancy intention, readiness, and family planning," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 44-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clara Walker & Tahmina Begum & Jacqueline A Boyle & James Ward & Federica Barzi, 2024. "Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-34, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manzer, Jamie L. & Bell, Ann V., 2022. "The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Wright, Kelsey Q., 2020. "Contraceptive selection and practice: Associations with self-identified race and socioeconomic disadvantage," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Kimport, Katrina, 2018. "Talking about male body-based contraceptives: The counseling visit and the feminization of contraception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 44-50.
    4. Stevens, Lindsay M., 2018. "“We have to be mythbusters”: Clinician attitudes about the legitimacy of patient concerns and dissatisfaction with contraception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 145-152.
    5. Jennifer Manlove & Brooke Whitfield & Jane Finocharo & Elizabeth Cook, 2021. "Lessons Learned from Replicating a Randomized Control Trial Evaluation of an App-Based Sexual Health Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Kissling, Alexandra, 2022. "“Thinking with my dad brain, not my man brain”: Understanding Men's and Women's sterilization risk narratives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Rosalind Waller & Michael Tholander & Doris Nilsson, 2017. "‘You Will Have These Ones!’: Six Women’s Experiences of Being Pressured to Make a Contraceptive Choice That Did Not Feel Right," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, September.
    8. C Geist & B G Everett & R G Simmons & J N Sanders & L M Gawron & K Myers & D K Turok, 2021. "Changing lives, dynamic plans: Prospective assessment of 12-month changes in pregnancy timing intentions and personal circumstances using data from HER Salt Lake," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-11, September.
    9. Samantha Auerbach & Kafuli Agbemenu & Rebecca Lorenz & Amy Hequembourg & Gretchen E. Ely, 2023. "Contraceptive Behavior in Appalachia: Exploring Use, Nonuse, and Contraceptive Attitudes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-10, September.
    10. Mieke C. W. Eeckhaut & Michael S. Rendall, 2022. "Are Births More Likely to be Intended Following Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives? An Analysis of U.S. Births in 2003–2015," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 1085-1110, June.
    11. Andrew G. Corley & Andrea Sprockett & Dominic Montagu & Nirali M. Chakraborty, 2022. "Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3702-:d:362335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.