IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i7p1257-d221024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between Knowledge of Zika Transmission and Preventative Measures among Latinas of Childbearing Age in Farm-Working Communities in South Florida

Author

Listed:
  • Naiya Patel

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Moneba Anees

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Reema Kola

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Juan Acuña

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Pura Rodriguez de la Vega

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Grettel Castro

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Juan G. Ruiz

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Patria Rojas

    (Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

Abstract

Zika infection, an otherwise usually mild disease, is of serious public health concern due to the potential teratogenic effects of the virus. The incidence of Zika infection is difficult to document since it is mostly asymptomatic and detection of those carrying Zika is usually not possible. Currently, there is no vaccine for Zika; therefore, use of personal preventative measures is the only method of avoiding transmission. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between knowledge of Zika transmission and the use of preventive measures among Latinas of childbearing age who lived in or near farm-working communities in South Florida. A secondary data analysis was performed on a cross-sectional study, sampling 100 Latina women aged 18–50 years. Sixty-nine percent demonstrated a high degree of knowledge of Zika transmission, and 68% were categorized as taking good preventative measures. Women with high knowledge were 5.86 times more likely to take good preventative measures than those with no knowledge ( p -value = 0.05). Knowledge was associated with more preventative measures. Therefore, it is essential to further investigate this relationship in order to develop effective public health interventions for this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Naiya Patel & Moneba Anees & Reema Kola & Juan Acuña & Pura Rodriguez de la Vega & Grettel Castro & Juan G. Ruiz & Patria Rojas, 2019. "Association between Knowledge of Zika Transmission and Preventative Measures among Latinas of Childbearing Age in Farm-Working Communities in South Florida," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1257-:d:221024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1257/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1257/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quintana-Domeque, Climent & Carvalho, José Raimundo & de Oliveira, Victor Hugo, 2018. "Zika virus incidence, preventive and reproductive behaviors: Correlates from new survey data," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 14-23.
    2. Bruce Y Lee & Jorge A Alfaro-Murillo & Alyssa S Parpia & Lindsey Asti & Patrick T Wedlock & Peter J Hotez & Alison P Galvani, 2017. "The potential economic burden of Zika in the continental United States," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Kenneth M. Winneg & Jo Ellen Stryker & Daniel Romer & Kathleen Hall Jamieson, 2018. "Differences Between Florida and the Rest of the United States in Response to Local Transmission of the Zika Virus: Implications for Future Communication Campaigns," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2546-2560, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Marbán-Castro & Ana Villén-Gonzalvo & Cristina Enguita-Fernàndez & Anna Marín-Cos & Clara Menéndez & Maria Maixenchs & Azucena Bardají, 2020. "Uncertainties, Fear and Stigma: Perceptions of Zika Virus among Pregnant Women in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Carlos Ruiz-Frutos & Mónica Ortega-Moreno & Adriano Dias & João Marcos Bernardes & Juan Jesús García-Iglesias & Juan Gómez-Salgado, 2020. "Information on COVID-19 and Psychological Distress in a Sample of Non-Health Workers during the Pandemic Period," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jabili Angina & Anish Bachhu & Eesha Talati & Rishi Talati & Jan Rychtář & Dewey Taylor, 2022. "Game-Theoretical Model of the Voluntary Use of Insect Repellents to Prevent Zika Fever," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 133-146, March.
    2. Lívia Madeira Triaca & Felipe Garcia Ribeiro & César Augusto Oviedo Tejada, 2021. "Mosquitoes, birth rates and regional spillovers: Evidence from the Zika epidemic in Brazil," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(3), pages 795-813, June.
    3. Cortes, D & Gamboa, L. F. & Rodríguez, P, 2020. "Contraception, Intra-household Behaviour and Epidemic: Evidence from the Zika crisis in Colombia," Documentos de Trabajo 18443, Universidad del Rosario.
    4. Motta, Matt, 2021. "Can a COVID-19 vaccine live up to Americans’ expectations? A conjoint analysis of how vaccine characteristics influence vaccination intentions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Stephen Mac & Sara R da Silva & Beate Sander, 2019. "The economic burden of Lyme disease and the cost-effectiveness of Lyme disease interventions: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Viviane Sanfelice, 2022. "Mosquito‐borne disease and newborn health," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 73-93, January.
    7. Jayanthi Rajarethinam & Janet Ong & Shi-Hui Lim & Yu-Heng Tay & Wacha Bounliphone & Chee-Seng Chong & Grace Yap & Lee-Ching Ng, 2019. "Using Human Movement Data to Identify Potential Areas of Zika Transmission: Case Study of the Largest Zika Cluster in Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Gamboa, Luis Fernando & Rodriguez Lesmes, Paul, 2019. "The fertility-inhibiting effect of mosquitoes: Socio-economic differences in response to the Zika crisis in Colombia," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 63-72.
    9. Elena Marbán-Castro & Ana Villén-Gonzalvo & Cristina Enguita-Fernàndez & Anna Marín-Cos & Clara Menéndez & Maria Maixenchs & Azucena Bardají, 2020. "Uncertainties, Fear and Stigma: Perceptions of Zika Virus among Pregnant Women in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Branden B. Johnson, 2018. "Residential Location and Psychological Distance in Americans’ Risk Views and Behavioral Intentions Regarding Zika Virus," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2561-2579, December.
    11. Lejla Dervisevic & Leigh Raymond & Linda J. Pfeiffer & Jessica V. Merzdorf, 2021. "Trade-offs versus reassurance: framing competing risks in the 2016 Zika outbreak," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 729-747, December.
    12. Branden B. Johnson, 2019. "Americans’ Views of Voluntary Protective Actions Against Zika Infection: Conceptual and Measurement Issues," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2694-2717, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1257-:d:221024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.