IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i6p1029-d215973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-Day Variability of Metabolites of DEHP and DnBP in Human Urine—Comparability of the Results of Longitudinal Studies with a Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sibylle Hildenbrand

    (Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstrasse 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Thomas Gabrio

    (State Health Office of Baden-Württemberg, Nordbahnhofstrasse 135, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Gerhard Volland

    (Material Testing Institute (MPA)—Otto-Graf-Institute, Pfaffenwaldring 32, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

In the current paper, we compare the inter-day variability of the metabolite concentration of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and di- n -butyl phthalate (DnBP) in 247 morning urine samples obtained from 19 probands of different age and sex with the metabolite concentration in morning urine obtained from 215 probands of the “Tübingen Survey” cross-sectional study. In the first longitudinal study the morning urine of seven volunteers was collected four times a year for seven consecutive days (course of the year study). In a second study the morning urine of 12 students of a boarding school was collected on five consecutive days (course of a week study). For participants of the two different longitudinal studies we obtained mean concentrations in first void morning urine for mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (5OH-MEHP) in the range from 21.3 to 110 µg/L, 10.5 to 35.6 µg/L for mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (5oxo-MEHP), and 45.5 to 143 µg/L for mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (5cx-MEPP). The corresponding relative standard deviations (rel. Std.D in %) for these DEHP-metabolites vary between 45.2% and 262%. The 50th percentiles vary for 5OH-MEHP between 17.5 and 65.6 µg/L, for 5oxo-MEHP between 9.0 and 20.3 µg/L and for 5cx-MEPP between 42.5 and 82.0 µg/L. For participants of the “Tübingen Survey” cross-sectional study the means vary for 5OH-MEHP between 58.2 and 85.0 µg/L, between 33.6 and 38.7 µg/L for 5oxo-MEHP and between 110 and 158 µg/L for 5cx-MEPP with rel. standard deviations in a range between 86.5 to 175%. The corresponding 50th percentiles vary for 5OH-MEHP between 26.5 and 42.3 µg/L, for 5oxo-MEHP between 18.0 and 26.3 µg/L, and for 5cx-MEPP between 57.2 and 77.6 µg/L. In order to compare the data from the longitudinal studies with the data from the cross-sectional study, the frequency distribution of the results of both types of studies was compared first. In a second step, the results of a t -test ( p -values) was used to check whether the results of the long-term studies differ statistically significantly from the results of the cross-sectional study ( p < 0.05). The present data show that the frequency distributions of DEHP-metabolites are comparable. For most of the participants respectively subject groups t -test results prove that no statistical significant difference between results obtained from longitudinal studies compared to the results of the cross-sectional study are apparent. The available data on the exposure of individual subjects mirror the data obtained from cross-sectional studies of the general population and give hints to the risk of individual increased DEHP exposure. Results also highlight the importance of living conditions on the risk of increased DEHP exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Sibylle Hildenbrand & Thomas Gabrio & Gerhard Volland, 2019. "Inter-Day Variability of Metabolites of DEHP and DnBP in Human Urine—Comparability of the Results of Longitudinal Studies with a Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1029-:d:215973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Wormuth & Martin Scheringer & Meret Vollenweider & Konrad Hungerbühler, 2006. "What Are the Sources of Exposure to Eight Frequently Used Phthalic Acid Esters in Europeans?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 803-824, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yun-Jung Yang & Taehyen Kim & Yeon-Pyo Hong, 2021. "Urinary Phthalate Levels Associated with the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adults: The Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2012–2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Giovanna Tranfo & Lidia Caporossi & Daniela Pigini & Silvia Capanna & Bruno Papaleo & Enrico Paci, 2018. "Temporal Trends of Urinary Phthalate Concentrations in Two Populations: Effects of REACH Authorization after Five Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Samantha E. Serrano & Catherine J. Karr & Noah S. Seixas & Ruby H. N. Nguyen & Emily S. Barrett & Sarah Janssen & Bruce Redmon & Shanna H. Swan & Sheela Sathyanarayana, 2014. "Dietary Phthalate Exposure in Pregnant Women and the Impact of Consumer Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Ruihua Dong & Shanzhen Zhao & Han Zhang & Jingsi Chen & Meiru Zhang & Min Wang & Min Wu & Shuguang Li & Bo Chen, 2017. "Sex Differences in the Association of Urinary Concentrations of Phthalates Metabolites with Self-Reported Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases in Shanghai Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Barend L. van Drooge & Ioar Rivas & Xavier Querol & Jordi Sunyer & Joan O. Grimalt, 2020. "Organic Air Quality Markers of Indoor and Outdoor PM 2.5 Aerosols in Primary Schools from Barcelona," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Sang-Woo Kim & Jeongho Lee & Soon-Chan Kwon & June-Hee Lee, 2021. "Association between Urinary Phthalate Metabolite Concentration and Atopic Dermatitis in Korean Adolescents Participating in the Third Korean National Environmental Health Survey, 2015–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Eun-Jung Yang & Byung-Sun Choi & Yun-Jung Yang, 2022. "Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Associated with Urinary Phthalate Metabolites Levels in Adults with Subclinical Hypothyroidism: Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2012–20," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Te Liu & Yiyang Jia & Liting Zhou & Qi Wang & Di Sun & Jin Xu & Juan Wu & Huaiji Chen & Feng Xu & Lin Ye, 2016. "Effects of Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate on the Hypothalamus–Uterus in Pubertal Female Rats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Matthias Wormuth & Evangelia Demou & Martin Scheringer & Konrad Hungerbühler, 2007. "Assessments of Direct Human Exposure—The Approach of EU Risk Assessments Compared to Scenario‐Based Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 979-990, August.
    10. David Trudel & Lea Horowitz & Matthias Wormuth & Martin Scheringer & Ian T. Cousins & Konrad Hungerbühler, 2008. "Estimating Consumer Exposure to PFOS and PFOA," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 251-269, April.
    11. Jiahui Wang & Zefei Xu & Jingyu Yao & Maochao Hu & Yuewen Sun & Cong Dong & Zhongming Bu, 2022. "Identification of Phthalates from Artificial Products in Chinese Kindergarten Classrooms and the Implications for Preschool Children’s Exposure Assessments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Jingping Niu & Qingshan Qu & Juansheng Li & Xingrong Liu & Benzhong Zhang & Zhilan Li & Guowu Ding & Yingbiao Sun & Yanrong Shi & Yaxiong Wan & Xiaobin Hu & Lung-Chi Chen & Alan Mendelsohn & Yu Chen &, 2015. "Improving Knowledge about Children’s Environmental Health in Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Liujia Fan & Lixin Wang & Kexin Wang & Fang Liu & Gang Wang, 2022. "Phthalates in Glass Window Films of Chinese University Dormitories and Their Associations with Indoor Decorating Materials and Personal Care Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. A. Jarosova & J. Harazim & P. Suchy & L. Kratka & V. Stancova, 2009. "The distribution and accumulation of phthalates in the organs and tissues of chicks after the administration of feedstuffs with different phthalate concentrations," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(9), pages 427-434.
    15. Cécile Marie & Sophie Cabut & Françoise Vendittelli & Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat, 2016. "Changes in Cosmetics Use during Pregnancy and Risk Perception by Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Sashoy G. Milton & Rachel A. Tejiram & Rashmi Joglekar & Kate Hoffman, 2023. "Characterizing the Contribution of Indoor Residential Phthalate and Phthalate Alternative Dust Concentrations to Internal Dose in the US General Population: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Maryam Zare Jeddi & Mohamad Eshaghi Gorji & Ivonne M. C. M. Rietjens & Jochem Louisse & Yuri Bruinen de Bruin & Roman Liska, 2018. "Biomonitoring and Subsequent Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Phthalates in Iranian Children and Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Subin Park & Bung-Nyun Kim & Soo-Churl Cho & Yeni Kim & Jae-Won Kim & Ju-Young Lee & Soon-Beom Hong & Min-Sup Shin & Hee Jeong Yoo & Hosub Im & Jae Hoon Cheong & Doug Hyun Han, 2014. "Association between Urine Phthalate Levels and Poor Attentional Performance in Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder with Evidence of Dopamine Gene-Phthalate Interaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Catherine A. Smith & Kyle Farmer & Hyunmin Lee & Matthew R. Holahan & Jeffrey C. Smith, 2015. "Altered Hippocampal Lipid Profile Following Acute Postnatal Exposure to Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate in Rats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Natalie Von Goetz & Matthias Wormuth & Martin Scheringer & Konrad Hungerbühler, 2010. "Bisphenol A: How the Most Relevant Exposure Sources Contribute to Total Consumer Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 473-487, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1029-:d:215973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.