IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p500-d204837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecast and Analysis on Reducing China’s CO 2 Emissions from Lime Industrial Process

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Tong

    (Institute of Energy, Environment, and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Sheng Zhou

    (Institute of Energy, Environment, and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yuefeng Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems & Suzhou Institute of Beihang University, Suzhou 215200, China)

  • Yang Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems & Suzhou Institute of Beihang University, Suzhou 215200, China)

  • Xinyang Wei

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China)

Abstract

China greenhouse gas inventories show that CO 2 emissions from the lime industrial process are large scales and closely related to the development of its downstream industries. Therefore, there is high importance to analyze and forecast on reducing China’s CO2 emissions from lime industrial process. The aims of this paper are to make up the research gaps in China and provide a quantitative reference for related authorities to formulate relevant policies. The prediction method in this paper is consistent with the published national inventory, which is an activity data based method to predict carbon dioxide emissions from the industrial process of four categories of lime products. Three future scenarios are assumed. The business as usual scenario (BAU) is a frozen scenario. There are two emission reduction scenarios (ERS and SRS) assumed under different emission reduction strength considering combined industrial process CO 2 emission reduction approaches from both the production side and the consumption side. The results show that between 2020 and 2050, China’s lime industrial process has an increasingly significant CO 2 emission reduction potential, enabling both emission intensity reductions and total emission reductions to be achieved simultaneously. Based on the simulation results from emission reduction scenarios, compared with 2012 level, in 2050, the emission intensity can be reduced by 13–27%, the total lime production can be reduced by 49–78%, and the CO 2 emissions in the lime industrial process can be reduced by 57–85%.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Tong & Sheng Zhou & Yuefeng Guo & Yang Zhang & Xinyang Wei, 2019. "Forecast and Analysis on Reducing China’s CO 2 Emissions from Lime Industrial Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:500-:d:204837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiping Wang & Hongdou Zhang, 2018. "Optimal design of carbon tax to stimulate CCS investment in China's coal‐fired power plants: A real options analysis," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 863-875, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erxi Wu & Qiaozhi Wang & Lihua Ke & Guangquan Zhang, 2023. "Study on Carbon Emission Characteristics and Emission Reduction Measures of Lime Production—A Case of Enterprise in the Yangtze River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiwei Zhang & Tianci Qing, 2022. "The effects of policy subsidy on the investment decisions of carbon capture and storage—A real‐options approach," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(6), pages 698-711, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:500-:d:204837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.