IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i11p1992-d237272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Deep Neural Networks and Ensemble Machine Learning Methods to Forecast Airborne Ambrosia Pollen

Author

Listed:
  • Gebreab K. Zewdie

    (William B. Hanson Center for Space Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • David J. Lary

    (William B. Hanson Center for Space Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Estelle Levetin

    (Department of Biological Science, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA)

  • Gemechu F. Garuma

    (Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC H2L 2C4, Canada)

Abstract

Allergies to airborne pollen are a significant issue affecting millions of Americans. Consequently, accurately predicting the daily concentration of airborne pollen is of significant public benefit in providing timely alerts. This study presents a method for the robust estimation of the concentration of airborne Ambrosia pollen using a suite of machine learning approaches including deep learning and ensemble learners. Each of these machine learning approaches utilize data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric weather and land surface reanalysis. The machine learning approaches used for developing a suite of empirical models are deep neural networks, extreme gradient boosting, random forests and Bayesian ridge regression methods for developing our predictive model. The training data included twenty-four years of daily pollen concentration measurements together with ECMWF weather and land surface reanalysis data from 1987 to 2011 is used to develop the machine learning predictive models. The last six years of the dataset from 2012 to 2017 is used to independently test the performance of the machine learning models. The correlation coefficients between the estimated and actual pollen abundance for the independent validation datasets for the deep neural networks, random forest, extreme gradient boosting and Bayesian ridge were 0.82, 0.81, 0.81 and 0.75 respectively, showing that machine learning can be used to effectively forecast the concentrations of airborne pollen.

Suggested Citation

  • Gebreab K. Zewdie & David J. Lary & Estelle Levetin & Gemechu F. Garuma, 2019. "Applying Deep Neural Networks and Ensemble Machine Learning Methods to Forecast Airborne Ambrosia Pollen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:1992-:d:237272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/1992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/1992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynda Hamaoui-Laguel & Robert Vautard & Li Liu & Fabien Solmon & Nicolas Viovy & Dmitry Khvorostyanov & Franz Essl & Isabelle Chuine & Augustin Colette & Mikhail A. Semenov & Alice Schaffhauser & Jona, 2015. "Effects of climate change and seed dispersal on airborne ragweed pollen loads in Europe," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 766-771, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carly Ray & Xue Ming, 2020. "Climate Change and Human Health: A Review of Allergies, Autoimmunity and the Microbiome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-7, July.
    2. Yingxiao Zhang & Allison L. Steiner, 2022. "Projected climate-driven changes in pollen emission season length and magnitude over the continental United States," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Nur Sabrina Idrose & Caroline J. Lodge & Bircan Erbas & Jo A. Douglass & Dinh S. Bui & Shyamali C. Dharmage, 2022. "A Review of the Respiratory Health Burden Attributable to Short-Term Exposure to Pollen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Maureen Agnew & Ivana Banic & Iain R. Lake & Clare Goodess & Carlota M. Grossi & Natalia R. Jones & Davor Plavec & Michelle Epstein & Mirjana Turkalj, 2018. "Modifiable Risk Factors for Common Ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia ) Allergy and Disease in Children: A Case-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Maria Elisa Di Cicco & Giuliana Ferrante & Doriana Amato & Antonino Capizzi & Carlo De Pieri & Valentina Agnese Ferraro & Maria Furno & Valentina Tranchino & Stefania La Grutta, 2020. "Climate Change and Childhood Respiratory Health: A Call to Action for Paediatricians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:1992-:d:237272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.