IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i11p1962-d236654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evaluation of Building Fire Emergency Response Capability Based on the CMM

Author

Listed:
  • Guofeng Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Sheng Tan

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Shanshan Shang

    (School of International Business Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201620, China)

Abstract

The construction of smart cities is a theme of urban development, and building fires greatly threaten public safety and urban environmental governance, in which fire emergency management is one of the key factors. However, most studies on the evaluation of emergency response capacity ignore the process of improvement, as well as the intelligence and practicality of the results. The evaluation system of building fire emergency response capability maturity (FE-CMM) was innovatively proposed based on the capability maturity model (CMM), including the evaluation index, evaluation grade, evaluation method, and evaluation process. At the same time, a plug-in for evaluating fire emergency response capability was developed based on the building information modeling (BIM) platform. Finally, an empirical study was carried out in combination with the case of a district fire center. The research demonstrates that the evaluation system can effectively judge the maturity of fire emergency response capability, and the established plug-in can preliminarily realize the intelligent evaluation of building fire emergency response capability, which improves the practice and intelligence of the fire emergency response capability evaluation system when fully considering the process of improvement. It has guiding significance for ex ante control and refined management of building fires, thus providing support for urban public safety and environmental governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Guofeng Ma & Sheng Tan & Shanshan Shang, 2019. "The Evaluation of Building Fire Emergency Response Capability Based on the CMM," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:1962-:d:236654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/1962/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/1962/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cao, Shuchao & Fu, Libi & Song, Weiguo, 2018. "Exit selection and pedestrian movement in a room with two exits under fire emergency," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 136-147.
    2. Huchang Liao & Guangsen Si & Zeshui Xu & Hamido Fujita, 2018. "Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanqing Wang & Hong Chen & Robert L. K. Tiong, 2023. "An exploratory research on the maturity level of public's emergency capability," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 325-355, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ning Zhang & Zaiwu Gong & Kedong Yin & Yuhong Wang, 2018. "Special Issue “Decision Models in Green Growth and Sustainable Development”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-8, May.
    2. Shi, Xiaomeng & Xue, Shuqi & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Li, Dawei & Ye, Zhirui, 2022. "Examining the effects of exit layout designs on children pedestrians’ exit choice," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 602(C).
    3. Zhang, Dezhen & Huang, Gaoyue & Ji, Chengtao & Liu, Huiying & Tang, Ying, 2021. "Pedestrian evacuation modeling and simulation in multi-exit scenarios," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    4. Wang, Peng & Cao, Shuchao & Yao, Ming, 2019. "Fundamental diagrams for pedestrian traffic flow in controlled experiments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 266-277.
    5. Ren, Huan & Yan, Yuyue & Gao, Fengqiang, 2021. "Variable guiding strategies in multi-exits evacuation: Pursuing balanced pedestrian densities," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 397(C).
    6. Danial A. Muhammed & Tarik A. Rashid & Abeer Alsadoon & Nebojsa Bacanin & Polla Fattah & Mokhtar Mohammadi & Indradip Banerjee, 2020. "An Improved Simulation Model for Pedestrian Crowd Evacuation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Xia Liu & Yejun Xu & Yao Ge & Weike Zhang & Francisco Herrera, 2019. "A Group Decision Making Approach Considering Self-Confidence Behaviors and Its Application in Environmental Pollution Emergency Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Guohua Qu & Rudan Xue & Tianjiao Li & Weihua Qu & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "A Stochastic Multi-Attribute Method for Measuring Sustainability Performance of a Supplier Based on a Triple Bottom Line Approach in a Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:1962-:d:236654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.