IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i1p1161-1175d32252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychosocial Work Environment, Stress Factors and Individual Characteristics among Nursing Staff in Psychiatric In-Patient Care

Author

Listed:
  • Tuvesson Hanna

    (School of Health Science, Blekinge Institute of Technology, SE-37971 Karlskrona, Sweden
    Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, SE-20506 Malmö, Sweden)

  • Eklund Mona

    (Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden)

Abstract

The psychosocial work environment is an important factor in psychiatric in-patient care, and knowing more of its correlates might open up new paths for future workplace interventions. Thus, the aims of the present study were to investigate perceptions of the psychosocial work environment among nursing staff in psychiatric in-patient care and how individual characteristics—Mastery, Moral Sensitivity, Perceived Stress, and Stress of Conscience—are related to different aspects of the psychosocial work environment. A total of 93 nursing staff members filled out five questionnaires: the QPSNordic 34+, Perceived Stress Scale, Stress of Conscience Questionnaire, Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, and Mastery scale. Multivariate analysis showed that Perceived Stress was important for Organisational Climate perceptions. The Stress of Conscience subscale Internal Demands and Experience in current units were indicators of Role Clarity. The other Stress of Conscience subscale, External Demands and Restrictions, was related to Control at Work. Two types of stress, Perceived Stress and Stress of Conscience, were particularly important for the nursing staff’s perception of the psychosocial work environment. Efforts to prevent stress may also contribute to improvements in the psychosocial work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuvesson Hanna & Eklund Mona, 2014. "Psychosocial Work Environment, Stress Factors and Individual Characteristics among Nursing Staff in Psychiatric In-Patient Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:1:p:1161-1175:d:32252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/1/1161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/1/1161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Van Bogaert & Sean Clarke & Riet Willems & Mieke Mondelaers, 2013. "Staff engagement as a target for managing work environments in psychiatric hospitals: implications for workforce stability and quality of care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1717-1728, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyesoo Lee & Juh Hyun Shin, 2021. "An Analysis of the Effects of Psychosocial Work Environment on the Retention Intentions of Primary Care Coordinators Nursing Patients with Chronic Illness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-8, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derong Zeng & Nozomu Takada & Yukari Hara & Shoko Sugiyama & Yoshimi Ito & Yoko Nihei & Kyoko Asakura, 2022. "Impact of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Work Engagement: A Cross-Sectional Study of Nurses Working in Long-Term Care Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Austyn Snowden & Hildegard Kolb, 2017. "Two years of unintended consequences: introducing an electronic health record system in a hospice in Scotland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1414-1427, May.
    3. Jacob González‐Gancedo & Elena Fernández‐Martínez & María Aurora Rodríguez‐Borrego, 2019. "Relationships among general health, job satisfaction, work engagement and job features in nurses working in a public hospital: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1273-1288, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:1:p:1161-1175:d:32252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.