IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v13y2021i3p62-d507153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed Ledger Technology Review and Decentralized Applications Development Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Antal

    (Computer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Tudor Cioara

    (Computer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ionut Anghel

    (Computer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Marcel Antal

    (Computer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ioan Salomie

    (Computer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) provides an infrastructure for developing decentralized applications with no central authority for registering, sharing, and synchronizing transactions on digital assets. In the last years, it has drawn high interest from the academic community, technology developers, and startups mostly by the advent of its most popular type, blockchain technology. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of DLT analyzing the challenges, provided solutions or alternatives, and their usage for developing decentralized applications. We define a three-tier based architecture for DLT applications to systematically classify the technology solutions described in over 100 papers and startup initiatives. Protocol and Network Tier contains solutions for digital assets registration, transactions, data structure, and privacy and business rules implementation and the creation of peer-to-peer networks, ledger replication, and consensus-based state validation. Scalability and Interoperability Tier solutions address the scalability and interoperability issues with a focus on blockchain technology, where they manifest most often, slowing down its large-scale adoption. The paper closes with a discussion on challenges and opportunities for developing decentralized applications by providing a multi-step guideline for decentralizing the design and implementation of traditional systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Antal & Tudor Cioara & Ionut Anghel & Marcel Antal & Ioan Salomie, 2021. "Distributed Ledger Technology Review and Decentralized Applications Development Guidelines," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:62-:d:507153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/3/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/3/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Rauchs & Garrick Hileman, 2010. "Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study," Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance Reports 201009-gbbs, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    2. Luisanna Cocco & Andrea Pinna & Michele Marchesi, 2017. "Banking on Blockchain: Costs Savings Thanks to the Blockchain Technology," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Del Rajan & Matt Visser, 2018. "Quantum Blockchain using entanglement in time," Papers 1804.05979, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    4. Vasiliy Elagin & Anastasia Spirkina & Andrei Levakov & Ilya Belozertsev, 2020. "Blockchain Behavioral Traffic Model as a Tool to Influence Service IT Security," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi-Hsiang Lu & Ching-Chiang Yeh & Yu-Mei Kuo, 2024. "Exploring the critical factors affecting the adoption of blockchain: Taiwan’s banking industry," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Martin Kenyeres & Jozef Kenyeres, 2021. "Comparative Study of Distributed Consensus Gossip Algorithms for Network Size Estimation in Multi-Agent Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Anthony Jnr. Bokolo, 2022. "Exploring interoperability of distributed Ledger and Decentralized Technology adoption in virtual enterprises," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 685-718, December.
    4. Mahdi Ghaemi Asl & Oluwasegun B. Adekoya & Muhammad Mahdi Rashidi, 2023. "Quantiles dependence and dynamic connectedness between distributed ledger technology and sectoral stocks: enhancing the supply chain and investment decisions with digital platforms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 435-464, August.
    5. Sławomir Bielecki & Tadeusz Skoczkowski & Lidia Sobczak & Marcin Wołowicz, 2022. "Electricity Usage Settlement System Based on a Cryptocurrency Instrument," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-35, September.
    6. Alexandru-Ioan Florea & Ionut Anghel & Tudor Cioara, 2022. "A Review of Blockchain Technology Applications in Ambient Assisted Living," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Ahad ZareRavasan & Taha Mansouri & Michal Krčál & Saeed Rouhani, 2022. "Editorial for the Special Issue on Blockchain: Applications, Challenges, and Solutions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-2, May.
    8. Gkogkos, Georgios & Patsonakis, Christos & Drosou, Anastasios & Tzovaras, Dimitrios, 2023. "A DLT-based framework for secure IoT infrastructure in smart communities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Haoli Sun & Bingfeng Pi & Jun Sun & Takeshi Miyamae & Masanobu Morinaga, 2021. "SASLedger: A Secured, Accelerated Scalable Storage Solution for Distributed Ledger Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plinio Limata, 2020. "Blockchain and Institutions (I): trust and (de)centralization," CERBE Working Papers wpC35, CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics.
    2. Valentina Gatteschi & Fabrizio Lamberti & Claudio Demartini & Chiara Pranteda & Víctor Santamaría, 2018. "Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Andrei Vladyko & Anastasia Spirkina & Vasiliy Elagin, 2021. "Towards Practical Applications in Modeling Blockchain System," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, May.
    4. Komulainen, Ruey & Nätti, Satu, 2023. "Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Bernhard Reinsberg & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "Blockchain Technology and International Relations: Decentralised Solutions To Foster Cooperation In An Anarchic World?," Working Papers wp508, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    6. Radosław Miśkiewicz & Krzysztof Matan & Jakub Karnowski, 2022. "The Role of Crypto Trading in the Economy, Renewable Energy Consumption and Ecological Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Abha Naik & Esra Yeniaras & Gerhard Hellstern & Grishma Prasad & Sanjay Kumar Lalta Prasad Vishwakarma, 2023. "From Portfolio Optimization to Quantum Blockchain and Security: A Systematic Review of Quantum Computing in Finance," Papers 2307.01155, arXiv.org.
    8. Juričić, Vedran & Radošević, Matea & Fuzul, Ena, 2019. "Enhancing the Usefulness of Blockchain Technology in Finance Sector," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 82-91, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    9. Mario Arias-Oliva & Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez & Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo, 2021. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Factors Influencing the Use of Cryptocurrencies in Spanish Households," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Tröster, Bernhard, 2020. "Blockchain technologies for commodity value chains: The solution for more sustainability?," Briefing Papers 27, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    11. Martin Cimiterra & Jackie Krafft & Lionel Nesta, 2021. "Blockchain as Schumpeter Mark 1 or Mark 2? An empirical analysis of blockchain job offers in France and Germany [Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1388-1402.
    12. Mahtab Kouhizadeh & Joseph Sarkis, 2018. "Blockchain Practices, Potentials, and Perspectives in Greening Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Alexandru-Gabriel Tudorache, 2022. "Design of an Exchange Protocol for the Quantum Blockchain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Jia, Zhenzhen & Tiwari, Sunil & Zhou, Jianhua & Farooq, Muhammad Umar & Fareed, Zeeshan, 2023. "Asymmetric nexus between Bitcoin, gold resources and stock market returns: Novel findings from quantile estimates," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Meennapa Rukhiran & Songwut Boonsong & Paniti Netinant, 2024. "Sustainable Optimizing Performance and Energy Efficiency in Proof of Work Blockchain: A Multilinear Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-38, February.
    17. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    18. Serrano-Calle, Silvia & Robles, Tomás & Martín, Diego & Mateos, Raquel, 2018. "Digitalization of Operations Management with Emotional and Intelligence Tools. Blockchain and IoT integration, the last disruption?," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184967, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Samuel BRÃœLISAUER & Anastasia COSTANTINI & Gianluca PASTORELLI, 2020. "The Digital Social Economy - Managing and Leveraging Platforms and Blockchain for a People-Centred Digital Transformation," CIRIEC Working Papers 2011, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    20. Yu-Cheng Kao & Kao-Yi Shen & San-Ting Lee & Joseph C. P. Shieh, 2022. "Selecting the Fintech Strategy for Supply Chain Finance: A Hybrid Decision Approach for Banks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:62-:d:507153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.