Exergy Analysis of an On-Vehicle Floating Piston Hydrogen Compression System for Direct-Injection Engines

Direct injection of hydrogen at high pressures into an otherwise unmodified heavy-duty diesel engine offers a near-term pathway to near-zero greenhouse gas emissions for commercial vehicles. Hydrogen direct-injection engines maintain diesel-like performance with equal or better thermal efficiency. Supplying the hydrogen for injection pressures of ~30 MPa requires a high-pressure supply. Onboard hydrogen compression enables more complete utilization of the stored compressed hydrogen; however, it introduces a significant parasitic load on the engine. The magnitude of this load depends on factors such as the compressor’s configuration, capacity, pressure ratio, efficiency, and the engine’s operating conditions. This paper presents an exergy analysis of an onboard hydrogen compression system that uses hydraulically driven free-floating pistons, sized for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Minimizing the parasitic loads from the compressor is essential to retain vehicle performance and maximize system-wide efficiency. The exergy analysis approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the whole compression system by comparably quantifying the losses across all components. A one-dimensional model of the compression system, developed in GT-SUITE TM and validated with experimental data, is used to quantify the main exergy loss components. Exergy efficiency ranges from 12% to 45% under varying pressure ratios and cycle frequencies, with a pronounced increase in efficiency observed at higher cycle frequencies. Major exergy losses occur in the hydraulic driving system up to 79%, especially during retracting and idle phases for lower pressure ratios and cycle frequencies. Within the compression cylinder, exergy destructions account for less than 10% of the total work input, wherein heat transfer and piston friction are identified as the dominant contributors to exergy destruction, with their effects intensifying at higher pressure ratios. This work highlights the challenges of onboard gas compression and develops a systematic framework that can compare compressor design alternatives for different driving cycles.