IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i16p4398-d1726956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption in a Residential Building: An Experimental Comparison Between a Heat Pump and Gas Boiler Employing Low-Cost Microcontroller-Driven Sensors

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Ballerini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Eugenia Rossi di Schio

    (Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Tawfiq Chekifi

    (Unité de Recherche Appliqué en Energies Renouvelables, URAER, Centre de Développement des Energies Renouvelables, CDER, Ghardaïa 47133, Algeria)

  • Paolo Valdiserri

    (Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Many buildings in Southern European countries are equipped with both gas boilers and air source heat pumps. The present work concerns an experimental evaluation of indoor comfort in an apartment within a residential building, comparing a gas boiler with cast-iron radiators to an air-to-air heat pump. The comfort conditions inside the apartment are assessed at set-point temperatures of 20 °C and 21 °C and with different water supply temperatures from the gas boiler. Energy consumption data for both heating systems are recorded during the tests. The measurements inside the apartment are conducted using inexpensive, widely accessible sensors and Arduino-like microcontrollers, calibrated before use. As a result, comfort indices for the heat pump are between those for the gas boiler at 20 °C and 21 °C. Additionally, to understand the impact of occupancy, an analysis of local discomfort and air quality was conducted by measuring CO 2 levels, which rose significantly without air exchange. Lastly, the experimental results are compared with previous dynamic and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analyses, showing the limit of the computational approach. Indeed, the comfort indices derived from the experimental study are superior to those obtained from dynamic simulations and CFD.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Ballerini & Eugenia Rossi di Schio & Tawfiq Chekifi & Paolo Valdiserri, 2025. "Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption in a Residential Building: An Experimental Comparison Between a Heat Pump and Gas Boiler Employing Low-Cost Microcontroller-Driven Sensors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4398-:d:1726956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4398-:d:1726956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.