IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i16p4347-d1724930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stefan Flow in Char Combustion: A Critical Review of Mass Transfer and Combustion Differences Between Air-Fuel and Oxy-Fuel Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Wenfei Bao

    (School of Nuclear Science, Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Zongwei Gan

    (School of Nuclear Science, Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Yuzhong Li

    (School of Nuclear Science, Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Yan Ma

    (Office for Xinglongshan Campus and Software Park Campus, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, China)

Abstract

Fuel combustion is a crucial process in energy utilization. As a key bulk transport mechanism, Stefan flow significantly affects heat and mass transfer during char combustion. However, its physical nature and engineering implications have long been underestimated, and no systematic review has been conducted. This paper presents a comprehensive review of Stefan flow in char combustion, with a focus on its impact on mass transfer and combustion behavior under both air-fuel and oxy-fuel conditions. It also highlights the critical role of Stefan flow in enhancing energy conversion efficiency and optimizing carbon capture processes. The analysis reveals that Stefan flow has been widely neglected in traditional combustion models, resulting in significant errors in calculated mass transfer coefficients (up to 21% in air-fuel combustion and as high as 74% in oxy-fuel combustion). This long-overlooked deviation severely compromises the accuracy of combustion efficiency predictions and model reliability. In oxy-fuel combustion, the gasification reaction (C + CO 2 = 2CO) induces a much stronger outward Stefan flow, reducing CO 2 transport by up to 74%, weakening local CO 2 enrichment, and substantially increasing the energy cost of carbon capture. In contrast, the oxidation reaction (2C + O 2 = 2CO) results in only an 18% reduction in O 2 transport. Stefan flow hinders the inward mass transfer of O 2 and CO 2 toward the char surface and increases heat loss during combustion, resulting in reduced reaction rates and lower particle temperatures. These effects contribute to incomplete fuel conversion and diminished thermal efficiency. Simulation studies that neglect Stefan flow produce significant errors when predicting combustion characteristics, particularly under oxy-fuel conditions. The impact of Stefan flow on energy balance is more substantial in the kinetic/diffusion-controlled regime than in the diffusion-controlled regime. This review is the first to clearly identify Stefan flow as the fundamental physical mechanism responsible for the differences in combustion behavior between air-fuel and oxy-fuel environments. It addresses a key gap in current research and offers a novel theoretical framework for improving low-carbon combustion models, providing important theoretical support for efficient combustion and clean energy conversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenfei Bao & Zongwei Gan & Yuzhong Li & Yan Ma, 2025. "Stefan Flow in Char Combustion: A Critical Review of Mass Transfer and Combustion Differences Between Air-Fuel and Oxy-Fuel Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4347-:d:1724930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4347-:d:1724930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.