IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i6p1457-d1359030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Ethane-Based CSI Process and Two Types of Flooding Process as a Hybrid Method for Enhancing Heavy Oil Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Yishu Li

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Zhongwei Du

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Bo Wang

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Jiasheng Ding

    (Novus Energy Inc., Calgary, AB T2P 3J4, Canada)

  • Fanhua Zeng

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

Abstract

Combining multiple secondary oil recovery (SOR)/enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods can be an effective way to maximize oil recovery from heavy oil reservoirs; however, previous studies typically focus on single methods. In order to optimize the combined process of ethane-based cyclic solvent injection (CSI) and water/nanoparticle-solution flooding, a comprehensive understanding of the impact of injection pressure, water, and nanoparticles on CSI performance is crucial. This study aims to provide such understanding through experimental evaluation, advancing the knowledge of EOR methods for heavy oil recovery. Three approaches (an ethane-based CSI process, water flooding, and nanoparticle-solution flooding) were applied through a cylindrical sandpack model with a length of 95.0 cm and a diameter of 3.8 cm. Test 1 conducted an ethane-based CSI process only. Test 2 conducted a combination approach of CSI–water flooding–CSI–nanoparticle-solution flooding–CSI. Specifically, the injection pressure of the first CSI phase in Test 2 was gradually increased from 3500 to 5500 kPa. The second and the third CSI phases had the same injection pressure as Test 1 at 5500 kPa. The CSI process ceased once the oil recovery was less than 0.5% of the original oil in place (OOIP) in a single cycle. Results show that the ethane-based CSI process is sensitive to injection pressure. A high injection pressure is crucial for optimal oil recovery. The first CSI phase in Test 2, where the injection pressure was increased gradually, resulted in a 2.9% lower oil recovery and five times as much ethane consumption compared to Test 1, which applied a high injection pressure. It was also found that water flooding improved the oil recovery in the CSI process. In Test 2, the oil recovery factor of the second CSI phase increased by 57% after the water flooding process, which is likely due to the formation of water channels and a dispersed oil phase that increased the contact area between ethane and oil. Although the nanoparticle-solution flooding only had 0.3% oil recovery, after that the third CSI phase stimulated another 10.8% of OOIP even when the water saturation achieved more than 65%. This demonstrated that the addition of nanoparticles can maintain the stability of the foam and enhance the transfer of ethane to the heavy oil. Finally, Test 2 reached a total oil recovery factor of 76.1% on a lab scale, an increase of 45% compared to the single EOR method, which proved the combination process is an efficient method to develop a heavy oil field.

Suggested Citation

  • Yishu Li & Zhongwei Du & Bo Wang & Jiasheng Ding & Fanhua Zeng, 2024. "An Ethane-Based CSI Process and Two Types of Flooding Process as a Hybrid Method for Enhancing Heavy Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1457-:d:1359030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Xiaohu & Liu, Huiqing & Chen, Zhangxin & Wu, Keliu & Lu, Ning & Zhang, Qichen, 2019. "Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1190-1211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Sijia & Jiang, Lanlan & Cheng, Zucheng & Liu, Yu & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2021. "Experimental study on the CO2-decane displacement front behavior in high permeability sand evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Li, Jing & Zhang, Lisong & Yang, Feiyue & Sun, Luning, 2020. "Positive measure and potential implication for heavy oil recovery of dip reservoir using SAGD based on numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Zhou, Yuhao & Wang, Yanwei, 2022. "An integrated framework based on deep learning algorithm for optimizing thermochemical production in heavy oil reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    4. Anufriev, I.S. & Kopyev, E.P. & Alekseenko, S.V. & Sharypov, O.V. & Vigriyanov, M.S., 2022. "New ecology safe waste-to-energy technology of liquid fuel combustion with superheated steam," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Zhang, Lisong & Li, Jing & Sun, Luning & Yang, Feiyue, 2021. "An influence mechanism of shale barrier on heavy oil recovery using SAGD based on theoretical and numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Yiwei Wang & Yuan Wang & Sunhua Deng & Qiang Li & Jingjing Gu & Haoche Shui & Wei Guo, 2022. "Numerical Simulation Analysis of Heating Effect of Downhole Methane Catalytic Combustion Heater under High Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Camilo Andrés Guerrero-Martin & Angie Tatiana Ortega-Ramírez & Paula Alejandra Perilla Rodríguez & Shalom Jireth Reyes López & Laura Estefanía Guerrero-Martin & Raúl Salinas-Silva & Stefanny Camacho-G, 2023. "Analysis of Environmental Sustainability through a Weighting Matrix in the Oil and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Ying Shi & Hong He & Yu Li & Fei Ding & Zhuo Zhou & Nuolin Xiong, 2023. "High-Temperature-Resistant Epoxy Resin Gel Behavior and Profile Control in Heavy Oil Steam Drive," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Yao, Yue & Sun, Deqiang & Xu, Jin-Hua & Wang, Bin & Peng, Guohong & Sun, Bingmei, 2023. "Evaluation of enhanced oil recovery methods for mature continental heavy oil fields in China based on geology, technology and sustainability criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    10. Wang, Sen & Qin, Chaoxu & Feng, Qihong & Javadpour, Farzam & Rui, Zhenhua, 2021. "A framework for predicting the production performance of unconventional resources using deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    11. Chai, Maojie & Nourozieh, Hossein & Chen, Zhangxin & Yang, Min, 2022. "A semi-compositional approach to model asphaltene precipitation and deposition in solvent-based bitumen recovery processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    12. Anufriev, I.S., 2021. "Review of water/steam addition in liquid-fuel combustion systems for NOx reduction: Waste-to-energy trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Yuanrui Zhu & Shijun Huang & Lun Zhao & Menglu Yang & Tong Wu, 2020. "A New Model for Discriminating the Source of Produced Water from Cyclic Steam Stimulation Wells in Edge-Bottom Water Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Zhengbin Wu & Hanzhao Chen & Xidong Cai & Qiyang Gou & Liangliang Jiang & Kai Chen & Zhangxin Chen & Shu Jiang, 2023. "Current Status and Future Trends of In Situ Catalytic Upgrading of Extra Heavy Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.
    15. Laura Osma & Luis García & Romel Pérez & Carolina Barbosa & Jesús Botett & Jorge Sandoval & Eduardo Manrique, 2019. "Benefit–Cost and Energy Efficiency Index to Support the Screening of Hybrid Cyclic Steam Stimulation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Boris V. Malozyomov & Nikita V. Martyushev & Vladislav V. Kukartsev & Vadim S. Tynchenko & Vladimir V. Bukhtoyarov & Xiaogang Wu & Yadviga A. Tyncheko & Viktor A. Kukartsev, 2023. "Overview of Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery from Conventional and Unconventional Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-48, June.
    17. Zhou, Guangzhao & Guo, Zanquan & Sun, Simin & Jin, Qingsheng, 2023. "A CNN-BiGRU-AM neural network for AI applications in shale oil production prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    18. Yang, Min & Liu, Yishan & Lu, Ning & Chai, Maojie & Wang, Sen & Feng, Qihong & Chen, Zhangxin, 2023. "Integration of ramped temperature oxidation and combustion tube tests for kinetic modeling of heavy oil in-Situ combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    19. Yu, Peng, 2022. "Posterior probability-based hydraulic unit division and prediction: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. Kang, Shijie & Zhang, Shijing & Wang, Zhendong & Li, Shengli & Zhao, Fangci & Yang, Jie & Zhou, Lingbo & Deng, Yang & Sun, Guidong & Yu, Hongdong, 2023. "Highly efficient catalytic pyrolysis of oil shale by CaCl2 in subcritical water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1457-:d:1359030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.