IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i24p6251-d1541595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi Stage Organic Rankine Cycle Using Boil-Off Gas on Liquefied Hydrogen Carrier

Author

Listed:
  • Dahye Sung

    (Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Dong-A University, 37 Nakdong-daero 550 Boen-gil, Saha-gu, Busan 49315, Republic of Korea)

  • Wongwan Jung

    (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Dong-A University, 37 Nakdong-daero 550 Boen-gil, Saha-gu, Busan 49315, Republic of Korea)

  • Jungho Choi

    (Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Dong-A University, 37 Nakdong-daero 550 Boen-gil, Saha-gu, Busan 49315, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In this study, a Reheat Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) utilizing the cold energy of liquefied hydrogen (LH 2 ) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) was proposed, and its performance was evaluated by comparing it with the base model, which represented a conventional ORC. The process was simulated using ethane and propane, which were considered as potential refrigerants for the target system. A case study was conducted on the inlet pressure and temperature of the turbine included in the process to determine the optimal operating point. The calculation results indicated that ethane exhibited a higher energy efficiency, and a maximum net power of 34.65 kW was obtained when the inlet pressure and temperature of the turbine were 40 bar and 75 °C, respectively. Additionally, an exergy analysis was conducted to quantitatively analyze the high energy efficiency of the Reheat ORC model. We confirmed that exergy efficiency was up to 2.4% higher than that of the base model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahye Sung & Wongwan Jung & Jungho Choi, 2024. "Multi Stage Organic Rankine Cycle Using Boil-Off Gas on Liquefied Hydrogen Carrier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6251-:d:1541595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yanju & Li, Dongxu & Ma, Zheshu & Zheng, Meng & Lu, Zhanghao & Song, Hanlin & Guo, Xinjia & Shao, Wei, 2022. "Performance analysis and optimization of a novel vehicular power system based on HT-PEMFC integrated methanol steam reforming and ORC," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Schuster, A. & Karellas, S. & Aumann, R., 2010. "Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1033-1039.
    3. Chiara Dall’Armi & Davide Pivetta & Rodolfo Taccani, 2023. "Hybrid PEM Fuel Cell Power Plants Fuelled by Hydrogen for Improving Sustainability in Shipping: State of the Art and Review on Active Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.
    4. Elizabeth Lindstad & Gunnar S. Eskeland & Agathe Rialland & Anders Valland, 2020. "Decarbonizing Maritime Transport: The Importance of Engine Technology and Regulations for LNG to Serve as a Transition Fuel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    2. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 199-211.
    3. Liang, Zheng & Liang, Yingzong & Luo, Xianglong & Yu, Zhibin & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based methanol-solar-to-X hybrid energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    4. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    5. Li, You-Rong & Du, Mei-Tang & Wu, Shuang-Ying & Peng, Lan & Liu, Chao, 2012. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a condenser for a binary mixture of vapors in organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 341-347.
    6. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    7. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    8. Ayachi, Fadhel & Ksayer, Elias Boulawz & Neveu, Pierre & Zoughaib, Assaad, 2016. "Experimental investigation and modeling of a hermetic scroll expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 256-267.
    9. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Zhao, Y. & Fan, B.Y. & Wu, Y.T. & Mu, Q.H., 2012. "Performance analysis of a novel system combining a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with a gasoline engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 385-395.
    10. Kim, Jun-Soo & Choi, Jae-Hyuk, 2023. "Feasibility study on bio-heavy fuel as an alternative for marine fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    11. Liu, Chao & He, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2013. "The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 144-154.
    12. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    13. Pivetta, Davide & Tafone, Alessio & Mazzoni, Stefano & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Taccani, Rodolfo, 2024. "A multi-objective planning tool for the optimal supply of green hydrogen for an industrial port area decarbonization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    14. Arkadiusz Małek & Agnieszka Dudziak & Jacek Caban & Monika Stoma, 2024. "Strategic Model for Yellow Hydrogen Production Using the Metalog Family of Probability Distributions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Roy, J.P. & Misra, Ashok, 2012. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle using R-123 for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 227-235.
    16. Jung, Hyung-Chul & Taylor, Leighton & Krumdieck, Susan, 2015. "An experimental and modelling study of a 1 kW organic Rankine cycle unit with mixture working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 601-614.
    17. Sun, Hongchuang & Qin, Jiang & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Lin, Chih-Hung & Lin, Yi-Fan, 2018. "Performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle with expansion from superheated zone or two-phase zone based on temperature utilization rate of heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 566-576.
    18. Danieli, Piero & Rech, Sergio & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 and air Brayton-Joule versus ORC systems for heat recovery from glass furnaces: Performance and economic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 295-309.
    19. Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6251-:d:1541595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.