IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i6p2935-d1104725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Viable Fully Integrated Energy Community Based on the Holistic LINK Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Albana Ilo

    (Institute of Energy Systems and Electrical Drives, TU Wien, 1040 Vienna, Austria)

  • Helmut Bruckner

    (Sonnenplatz Großschönau GmbH, 3922 Großschönau, Austria)

  • Markus Olofsgard

    (AFRY, 401 51 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Marketa Adamcova

    (LEEF Technologies s.r.o., 186 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Andrea Werner

    (Institut für Erneuerbare Energie, FH Technikum Wien, 1200 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

The EU policymakers have adopted legislation to support communities taking responsibility for the energy transition. However, their development and integration are still in their early stages: many studies are performed without considering the overlapped social, economic, political, electrical, and information technology tasks simultaneously. This paper is the first to look at energy communities in their entirety, from the roles of the actors to the organisation, regulation, technical solution, and the market, to the use and business cases. The waterfall methodology was used throughout the work. The results show that energy communities can be viable by becoming reliable players so DSOs can better integrate the acquired flexibility and other services into their processes without compromising power supply. Their technical integration requires a coordinated operation and control of the entire power grid, including transmission and distribution, and the end-users, as proposed by the LINK holistic solution. The suggested fractal-based market structure, with the national, regional and local markets harmonised with the grid, facilitates the direct participation of small customers and distributed resources to the energy market. The results of this work may help policymakers, regulators, and industry representatives define new energy policies and processes related to research and development programs for implementing fully integrated renewable energy communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Albana Ilo & Helmut Bruckner & Markus Olofsgard & Marketa Adamcova & Andrea Werner, 2023. "Viable Fully Integrated Energy Community Based on the Holistic LINK Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2935-:d:1104725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2935/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2935/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albana ILO, 2019. "Design of the Smart Grid Architecture According to Fractal Principles and the Basics of Corresponding Market Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Schleicher-Tappeser, Ruggero, 2012. "How renewables will change electricity markets in the next five years," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 64-75.
    3. Shen, Bo & Ghatikar, Girish & Lei, Zeng & Li, Jinkai & Wikler, Greg & Martin, Phil, 2014. "The role of regulatory reforms, market changes, and technology development to make demand response a viable resource in meeting energy challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 814-823.
    4. Juho Hamari & Mimmi Sjöklint & Antti Ukkonen, 2016. "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(9), pages 2047-2059, September.
    5. Zhang, Chenghua & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Cheng, Meng & Long, Chao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ableitner, Liliane & Tiefenbeck, Verena & Meeuw, Arne & Wörner, Anselma & Fleisch, Elgar & Wortmann, Felix, 2020. "User behavior in a real-world peer-to-peer electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    2. Mengelkamp, Esther & Schönland, Thomas & Huber, Julian & Weinhardt, Christof, 2019. "The value of local electricity - A choice experiment among German residential customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 294-303.
    3. Soto, Esteban A. & Bosman, Lisa B. & Wollega, Ebisa & Leon-Salas, Walter D., 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy trading: A review of the literature," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Rodrigues, Daniel L. & Ye, Xianming & Xia, Xiaohua & Zhu, Bing, 2020. "Battery energy storage sizing optimisation for different ownership structures in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Niesten, Eva & Alkemade, Floortje, 2016. "How is value created and captured in smart grids? A review of the literature and an analysis of pilot projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 629-638.
    6. Soto, Esteban A. & Bosman, Lisa B. & Wollega, Ebisa & Leon-Salas, Walter D., 2022. "Comparison of net-metering with peer-to-peer models using the grid and electric vehicles for the electricity exchange," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    7. Adamu Sani Yahaya & Nadeem Javaid & Fahad A. Alzahrani & Amjad Rehman & Ibrar Ullah & Affaf Shahid & Muhammad Shafiq, 2020. "Blockchain Based Sustainable Local Energy Trading Considering Home Energy Management and Demurrage Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Marco Schletz & Ana Cardoso & Gabriela Prata Dias & Søren Salomo, 2020. "How Can Blockchain Technology Accelerate Energy Efficiency Interventions? A Use Case Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Umer, Khalid & Huang, Qi & Khorasany, Mohsen & Afzal, Muhammad & Amin, Waqas, 2021. "A novel communication efficient peer-to-peer energy trading scheme for enhanced privacy in microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    10. Ante, L. & Steinmetz, F. & Fiedler, I., 2021. "Blockchain and energy: A bibliometric analysis and review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Mohammad Esmaeil Honarmand & Vahid Hosseinnezhad & Barry Hayes & Pierluigi Siano, 2021. "Local Energy Trading in Future Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Khuram Shahzad & Sohail Iqbal & Hamid Mukhtar, 2021. "Optimal Fuzzy Energy Trading System in a Fog-Enabled Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Hui Huang & Shilin Nie & Jin Lin & Yuanyuan Wang & Jun Dong, 2020. "Optimization of Peer-to-Peer Power Trading in a Microgrid with Distributed PV and Battery Energy Storage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Jing, Rui & Xie, Mei Na & Wang, Feng Xiang & Chen, Long Xiang, 2020. "Fair P2P energy trading between residential and commercial multi-energy systems enabling integrated demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    15. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Michael J. Fell & Alexandra Schneiders & David Shipworth, 2019. "Consumer Demand for Blockchain-Enabled Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in the United Kingdom: An Online Survey Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Wang, Dongxiao & Qiu, Jing & Reedman, Luke & Meng, Ke & Lai, Loi Lei, 2018. "Two-stage energy management for networked microgrids with high renewable penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 39-48.
    19. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    20. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2935-:d:1104725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.