IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p8119-d959321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classical and Process Intensification Methods for Acetic Acid Concentration: Technical and Environmental Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Letitia Petrescu

    (Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babeș-Bolyai University, 11 Arany Janos, RO-400028 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Codruta-Maria Cormos

    (Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babeș-Bolyai University, 11 Arany Janos, RO-400028 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate, from a technical and an environmental perspective, various alternatives for acetic acid concentration for maximizing acetic acid production, its purity, and in the meantime, minimizing the energy usage and the environmental impact. Liquid–liquid extraction followed by azeotropic distillation using different solvents such as: (i) ethyl acetate, (ii) isopropyl acetate, and (iii) a mixture containing isopropyl acetate and isopropanol were first explored, using process flow modeling software. The three cases were compared considering various technical key performance indicators (i.e., acetic acid flow-rate, acetic acid purity, acetic acid recovery, power consumption, thermal energy used, and number of equipment units involved) leading to the conclusion that the usage of the isopropyl acetate—isopropanol mixture leads to better technical results. The isopropanol-isopropyl acetate mixture was furthermore investigated in other two cases where process intensification methods, based on thermally coupled respectively the double-effect distillation process, are proposed. The highest quantity of pure acetic acid (e.g., 136 kmol/h) and the highest recovery rate (e.g., 97.74%) were obtained using the double-effect method. A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment, involving ReCiPe method, was used to calculate and compare various environmental impact indicators (i.e., climate change, freshwater toxicity potential, human toxicity, etc.). Several steam sources (i.e., hard coal, heavy fuel oil, light fuel oil, natural gas, and biomass) were considered in the environmental evaluation. The results of the life cycle assessment show a reduction, by almost half, in all the environmental impact indicators when the double effect method is compared to the thermally coupled process. The usage of biomass for steam generation lead to lower impacts compared to steam generation using fossil fuels (i.e., hard coal, heavy fuel oil, light fuel oil, natural gas).

Suggested Citation

  • Letitia Petrescu & Codruta-Maria Cormos, 2022. "Classical and Process Intensification Methods for Acetic Acid Concentration: Technical and Environmental Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8119-:d:959321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8119/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8119/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David S. Sholl & Ryan P. Lively, 2016. "Seven chemical separations to change the world," Nature, Nature, vol. 532(7600), pages 435-437, April.
    2. Wiranarongkorn, Kunlanan & Im-orb, Karittha & Panpranot, Joongjai & Maréchal, François & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2021. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of sustainable furfural production via reactive distillation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Areej Javed & Afaq Hassan & Muhammad Babar & Umair Azhar & Asim Riaz & Rana Mujahid & Tausif Ahmad & Muhammad Mubashir & Hooi Ren Lim & Pau Loke Show & Kuan Shiong Khoo, 2022. "A Comparison of the Exergy Efficiencies of Various Heat-Integrated Distillation Columns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Kiss, Anton A. & Smith, Robin, 2020. "Rethinking energy use in distillation processes for a more sustainable chemical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cui, Chengtian & Qi, Meng & Zhang, Xiaodong & Sun, Jinsheng & Li, Qing & Kiss, Anton A. & Wong, David Shan-Hill & Masuku, Cornelius M. & Lee, Moonyong, 2024. "Electrification of distillation for decarbonization: An overview and perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Eyvazi-Abhari, Nargess & Khalili-Garakani, Amirhossein & Kasiri, Norollah, 2023. "Reaction/distillation matrix algorithm development to cover sequences containing reactive HIDiC: Validation in optimized process of dimethyl carbonate production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Dmitry A. Sladkovskiy & Dmitry Yu. Murzin, 2022. "Integrated Power Systems for Oil Refinery and Petrochemical Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Wiranarongkorn, Kunlanan & Im-orb, Karittha & Panpranot, Joongjai & Maréchal, François & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2021. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of sustainable furfural production via reactive distillation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Marina, A. & Spoelstra, S. & Zondag, H.A. & Wemmers, A.K., 2021. "An estimation of the European industrial heat pump market potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Albuquerque, Allan Almeida & Ng, Flora T.T. & Danielski, Leandro & Stragevitch, Luiz, 2022. "Reactive separation processes applied to biodiesel production from residual oils and fats: Design, optimization and techno-economic assessment of routes using solid catalysts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Peixin Zhang & Lifeng Yang & Xing Liu & Jun Wang & Xian Suo & Liyuan Chen & Xili Cui & Huabin Xing, 2022. "Ultramicroporous material based parallel and extended paraffin nano-trap for benchmark olefin purification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Mariem Ferchichi & Laszlo Hegely & Peter Lang, 2021. "Decrease of energy demand of semi-batch distillation policies," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(8), pages 1479-1503, December.
    9. Muhammad Abdul Qyyum & Yus Donald Chaniago & Wahid Ali & Hammad Saulat & Moonyong Lee, 2020. "Membrane-Assisted Removal of Hydrogen and Nitrogen from Synthetic Natural Gas for Energy-Efficient Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian & Petrescu, Letitia & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2022. "Classical vs. reactive distillation technologies for biodiesel production: An environmental comparison using LCA methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 289-299.
    11. Zhenggong Wang & Xiaofan Luo & Zejun Song & Kuan Lu & Shouwen Zhu & Yanshao Yang & Yatao Zhang & Wangxi Fang & Jian Jin, 2022. "Microporous polymer adsorptive membranes with high processing capacity for molecular separation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Wang, Qianlin & Han, Jiaqi & Chen, Feng & Hu, Su & Yun, Cheng & Dou, Zhan & Yan, Tingjun & Yang, Guoan, 2024. "Modeling risk characterization networks for chemical processes based on multi-variate data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    13. Zheyuan Guo & Wenping Li & Hong Wu & Li Cao & Shuqing Song & Xiaohui Ma & Jiafu Shi & Yanxiong Ren & Tong Huang & Yonghong Li & Zhongyi Jiang, 2025. "Reverse filling approach to mixed matrix covalent organic framework membranes for gas separation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Bruno Franco & Lieven Clarisse & Martin Van Damme & Juliette Hadji-Lazaro & Cathy Clerbaux & Pierre-François Coheur, 2022. "Ethylene industrial emitters seen from space," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Lei Zhang & Zhe Chen & Zhenpeng Liu & Jun Bu & Wenxiu Ma & Chen Yan & Rui Bai & Jin Lin & Qiuyu Zhang & Junzhi Liu & Tao Wang & Jian Zhang, 2021. "Efficient electrocatalytic acetylene semihydrogenation by electron–rich metal sites in N–heterocyclic carbene metal complexes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    16. Jinqiu Yuan & Xinda You & Niaz Ali Khan & Runlai Li & Runnan Zhang & Jianliang Shen & Li Cao & Mengying Long & Yanan Liu & Zijian Xu & Hong Wu & Zhongyi Jiang, 2022. "Photo-tailored heterocrystalline covalent organic framework membranes for organics separation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Yi-Xin Liu & Ping-Xin Wu & Jing-Yi Dai & Ping-Wei Cai & Cai Sun & Shou-Tian Zheng, 2024. "Site differentiation strategy for selective strontium uptake and elution within an all-inorganic polyoxoniobate framework," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Qian Zhang & Bo Gao & Ling Zhang & Xiaopeng Liu & Jixiang Cui & Yijun Cao & Hongbo Zeng & Qun Xu & Xinwei Cui & Lei Jiang, 2023. "Anomalous water molecular gating from atomic-scale graphene capillaries for precise and ultrafast molecular sieving," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Tanmoy Maity & Susmita Sarkar & Susmita Kundu & Suvendu Panda & Arighna Sarkar & Raheel Hammad & Kalyaneswar Mandal & Soumya Ghosh & Jagannath Mondal & Ritesh Haldar, 2024. "Steering diffusion selectivity of chemical isomers within aligned nanochannels of metal-organic framework thin film," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Qingju Wang & Lifeng Yang & Tian Ke & Jianbo Hu & Xian Suo & Xili Cui & Huabin Xing, 2024. "Selective sorting of hexane isomers by anion-functionalized metal-organic frameworks with optimal energy regulation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8119-:d:959321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.