IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i1p389-d718537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

OC6 Phase Ia: CFD Simulations of the Free-Decay Motion of the DeepCwind Semisubmersible

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Wang

    (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Amy Robertson

    (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Jason Jonkman

    (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Jang Kim

    (Front Energies, Houston, TX 77084, USA)

  • Zhi-Rong Shen

    (Front Energies, Houston, TX 77084, USA)

  • Arjen Koop

    (Maritime Research Institute Netherlands, 6708 PM Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Adrià Borràs Nadal

    (IFP Energies Nouvelles, 92852 Rueil-Malmaison, France)

  • Wei Shi

    (State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Xinmeng Zeng

    (State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Edward Ransley

    (School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Scott Brown

    (School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Martyn Hann

    (School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Pranav Chandramouli

    (Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Axelle Viré

    (Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Likhitha Ramesh Reddy

    (Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Xiang Li

    (Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Qing Xiao

    (Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Beatriz Méndez López

    (National Renewable Energy Centre (CENER), 31621 Sarriguren, Spain)

  • Guillén Campaña Alonso

    (National Renewable Energy Centre (CENER), 31621 Sarriguren, Spain)

  • Sho Oh

    (Renewable Energy Department, Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Tokyo 102-8567, Japan)

  • Hamid Sarlak

    (Aero- and Fluid-Dynamics Section, Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Stefan Netzband

    (Fluid Dynamics and Ship Theory, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Hyunchul Jang

    (Technip Energies, Houston, TX 77079, USA)

  • Kai Yu

    (American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, TX 77389, USA)

Abstract

Currently, the design of floating offshore wind systems is primarily based on mid-fidelity models with empirical drag forces. The tuning of the model coefficients requires data from either experiments or high-fidelity simulations. As part of the OC6 (Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continued, with Correlation, and unCertainty (OC6) is a project under the International Energy Agency Wind Task 30 framework) project, the present investigation explores the latter option. A verification and validation study of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of the DeepCwind semisubmersible undergoing free-decay motion is performed. Several institutions provided CFD results for validation against the OC6 experimental campaign. The objective is to evaluate whether the CFD setups of the participants can provide valid estimates of the hydrodynamic damping coefficients needed by mid-fidelity models. The linear and quadratic damping coefficients and the equivalent damping ratio are chosen as metrics for validation. Large numerical uncertainties are estimated for the linear and quadratic damping coefficients; however, the equivalent damping ratios are more consistently predicted with lower uncertainty. Some difference is observed between the experimental and CFD surge-decay motion, which is caused by mechanical damping not considered in the simulations that likely originated from the mooring setup, including a Coulomb-friction-type force. Overall, the simulations and the experiment show reasonable agreement, thus demonstrating the feasibility of using CFD simulations to tune mid-fidelity models.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Wang & Amy Robertson & Jason Jonkman & Jang Kim & Zhi-Rong Shen & Arjen Koop & Adrià Borràs Nadal & Wei Shi & Xinmeng Zeng & Edward Ransley & Scott Brown & Martyn Hann & Pranav Chandramouli & Axell, 2022. "OC6 Phase Ia: CFD Simulations of the Free-Decay Motion of the DeepCwind Semisubmersible," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-38, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:389-:d:718537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Lu & Bergua, Roger & Robertson, Amy & Wright, Alan & Zalkind, Daniel & Fowler, Matthew & Lenfest, Eben & Viselli, Anthony & Goupee, Andrew & Kimball, Richard, 2024. "Experimental investigation of advanced turbine control strategies and load-mitigation measures with a model-scale floating offshore wind turbine system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    2. Zeng, Fanxu & Zhang, Ningchuan & Huang, Guoxing & Gu, Qian & He, Meng, 2023. "Dynamic response of floating offshore wind turbines under freak waves with large crest and deep trough," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Zeng, Xinmeng & Shao, Yanlin & Feng, Xingya & Xu, Kun & Jin, Ruijia & Li, Huajun, 2024. "Nonlinear hydrodynamics of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:389-:d:718537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.