IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i19p7333-d934420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproducibility of Small-Format Laboratory Cells

Author

Listed:
  • Paul-Martin Luc

    (Electrical Energy Storage Technology, Department of Energy and Automation Technology, Faculty IV, Secr. EMH 2, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 11, D-10587 Berlin, Germany)

  • Fabio Buchwald

    (Electrical Energy Storage Technology, Department of Energy and Automation Technology, Faculty IV, Secr. EMH 2, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 11, D-10587 Berlin, Germany)

  • Julia Kowal

    (Electrical Energy Storage Technology, Department of Energy and Automation Technology, Faculty IV, Secr. EMH 2, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 11, D-10587 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

For the research and development of new battery materials, achieving high reproducibility of the performance parameters in the laboratory test cells is of great importance. Therefore, in the present work, three typical small-format lithium-ion cells (coin cell, Swagelok cell and EL-CELL ECC-PAT-Core) were tested and compared with regard to the reproducibility of their performance parameters (discharge capacity, internal resistance and coulombic efficiency). A design of experiments (DOE) with the two factors separator type and anode–cathode ratio (N/P ratio) was carried out for all cells. For the quality features discharge capacity, internal resistance and coulombic efficiency, the coefficient of variation is used as a measure of reproducibility. The statistical evaluation shows that in 83% of all cases, higher reproducibility is achieved when the Freudenberg separator is used instead of the Celgard separator. In addition, higher reproducibility is achieved in 78% of all cases if the anode and cathode are the same size. A general statement about which test cell format has the highest reproducibility cannot be made. Rather, the format selection should be adapted to the requirements. The examined factors seem to have an influence on the reproducibility but are more insignificant than other still-unknown factors. Since the production of small-format test cells is a manual process, the competence of the assembler seems to prevail. In order to mitigate the influence of as many unknown variables as possible, assembly instructions are proposed for each cell type.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul-Martin Luc & Fabio Buchwald & Julia Kowal, 2022. "Reproducibility of Small-Format Laboratory Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7333-:d:934420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sieg, Johannes & Schmid, Alexander U. & Rau, Laura & Gesterkamp, Andreas & Storch, Mathias & Spier, Bernd & Birke, Kai Peter & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2022. "Fast-charging capability of lithium-ion cells: Influence of electrode aging and electrolyte consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Zhaohui & Fu, Yijie & Liang, Hong & Gao, Renjing & Liu, Shutian, 2023. "A module-level charging optimization method of lithium-ion battery considering temperature gradient effect of liquid cooling and charging time," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7333-:d:934420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.