IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i12p4406-d840853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Acceptance Capacity of Distributed Generation in Distribution Network Considering Carbon Emission

Author

Listed:
  • Yixin Huang

    (Xiamen Power Supply Company, State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361004, China)

  • Lei Zhao

    (Fuzhou Power Supply Company, State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350009, China)

  • Weiqiang Qiu

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Yuhang Xu

    (Xiamen Power Supply Company, State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361004, China)

  • Junyan Gao

    (Xiamen Power Supply Company, State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361004, China)

  • Youxiang Yan

    (Xiamen Power Supply Company, State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361004, China)

  • Tong Wu

    (Xiamen Power Supply Company, State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361004, China)

  • Zhenzhi Lin

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

Abstract

Under the background of renewable-dominated electric power system construction, the penetration rate of low-carbon and renewable distributed generation (DG) in distribution network is increasing, which has changed the form and operation mode of the distribution network. To deal with the output fluctuation of high penetration DG in the distribution network operations, it is necessary to evaluate the acceptance capacity of DG. The correct evaluation can realize the secure, economic and low-carbon configuration of DG. In this paper, an evaluation method of acceptance capacity of DG in the distribution network considering the carbon emission is proposed. Firstly, a multi-objective evaluation model of acceptance capacity of DG is constructed with the objectives of minimizing carbon emission in the full life cycle, minimizing node voltage deviation and maximizing line capacity margin. Secondly, the improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed to solve the model to determine the Pareto optimal solutions of DG configuration. Then, the comprehensive index of acceptance capacity evaluation is obtained based on entropy weight method to decide the optimal compromise solution. Finally, an actual 55-bus distribution network in China is used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. The simulation results show that the proposed evaluation method can comprehensively obtain the optimal compromise solution considering the reliability, economy and carbon emission benefits of distribution network operation, which guides the DG configuration in the distribution network.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixin Huang & Lei Zhao & Weiqiang Qiu & Yuhang Xu & Junyan Gao & Youxiang Yan & Tong Wu & Zhenzhi Lin, 2022. "Evaluation of Acceptance Capacity of Distributed Generation in Distribution Network Considering Carbon Emission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4406-:d:840853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guiliang Tian & Suwan Yu & Zheng Wu & Qing Xia, 2022. "Study on the Emission Reduction Effect and Spatial Difference of Carbon Emission Trading Policy in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Hujun Wang & Xiaodong Shen & Junyong Liu, 2022. "Planning of New Distribution Network Considering Green Power Certificate Trading and Carbon Emissions Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eryu Zhang & Xiaoyu He & Peng Xiao, 2022. "Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Yudong Tan & Guosheng Xie & Yunhao Xiao & Yi Luo & Xintao Xie & Ming Wen, 2022. "Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Hybrid Pumped-Storage Power Stations Based on Improved Rank Correlation-Entropy Weight Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Xuehui Yang & Jiaping Zhang & Lehua Bi & Yiming Jiang, 2023. "Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Peishu Chen & Yu He & Kai Yue & Guochang Fang, 2023. "Can Carbon Trading Promote Low-Carbon Transformation of High Energy Consumption Enterprises?—The Case of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Danzhu Liu & Jinqiang Liang & Shuliang Xu & Mao Ye, 2023. "Analysis of Carbon Emissions Embodied in the Provincial Trade of China Based on an Input–Output Model and k-Means Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Ke Luo & Shuo Chen & Shixi Cui & Yuantao Liao & Yu He & Chunshan Zhou & Shaojian Wang, 2023. "Examining the Overall and Heterogeneous Impacts of Urban Spatial Structure on Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Feng Liu & Yu Fu & Weiguo Wang, 2023. "Heterogeneous Effects of China’s Carbon Market on Carbon Emissions—Evidence from a Regression Control Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Pengfei Cheng & Xingang Huan & Baekryul Choi, 2022. "The Comprehensive Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on China’s Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Anbao Tang & Ning Xu, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Urban Green Efficiency—Evidence from Carbon Pilot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Ping Cao & Xiaoxiao Li & Yu Cheng & Han Shen, 2022. "Temporal-Spatial Evolution and Driving Factors of Global Carbon Emission Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Xueyang Wang & Xiumei Sun & Haotian Zhang & Mahmood Ahmad, 2022. "Digital Economy and Environmental Quality: Insights from the Spatial Durbin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Wenjun Ge & Derong Yang & Weineng Chen & Sheng Li, 2023. "Can Setting Up a Carbon Trading Mechanism Improve Urban Eco-Efficiency? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4406-:d:840853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.