IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i11p3860-d822674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Reliability of Wind Farm Devices in the Operation Process

Author

Listed:
  • Stanisław Duer

    (Department of Energy, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Koszalin, 15-17 Raclawicka St., 75-620 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Jacek Paś

    (Faculty of Electronic, Military University of Technology of Warsaw, 2 Urbanowicza St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Aneta Hapka

    (Faculty of Electronic and Informatics, Technical University of Koszalin, 2 Sniadeckich St., 75-620 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Radosław Duer

    (Faculty of Electronic and Informatics, Technical University of Koszalin, 2 Sniadeckich St., 75-620 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Ostrowski

    (Doctoral School, Technical University of Koszalin, 2 Sniadeckich St., 75-620 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Marek Woźniak

    (Doctoral School, Technical University of Koszalin, 2 Sniadeckich St., 75-620 Koszalin, Poland)

Abstract

The article deals with simulation tests on the reliability of the equipment of the wind farm WF in the operation process. The improvement, modernization, and introduction of new solutions that change the reliability, as well as the quality and conditions of use and operation of wind farm equipment, require testing. Based on these tests, it is possible to continuously evaluate the reliability of the equipment of WF. The issue of reliability assessment of wind farm equipment, for which intelligent systems, diagnostic systems DIAG, and Wind Power Plant Expert System (WPPES) are used to modernize the operation process, can only be tested in a simulative way. The topic of testing the reliability of complex technical objects is constantly developing in the literature. In this paper, it is assumed that the operation of wind farm equipment is described and modeled based on Markov processes. The adoption of this assumption justified the use of the Kolmogorov–Chapman equations to describe the developed model. Based on this equation, an analytically developed model of the wind farm operation process was described. The simulation analysis determines the reliability of the wind farm in terms of the availability factor K g (t). The simulation tests are performed in two phases using the computer program LabView. In the first stage, the reliability value in the form of the readiness factor K g (t) as a function of changes in the mean repair time value ranging {from 0.3 to 1.0} was investigated. In the second stage, the reliability value of WF devices was examined as a function of changes in the value of the average time between successive failures, ranging from 1000 to 3000 (h)}.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanisław Duer & Jacek Paś & Aneta Hapka & Radosław Duer & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Marek Woźniak, 2022. "Assessment of the Reliability of Wind Farm Devices in the Operation Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3860-:d:822674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanisław Duer, 2020. "Assessment of the Operation Process of Wind Power Plant’s Equipment with the Use of an Artificial Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Toshio Nakagawa, 2005. "Maintenance Theory of Reliability," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-221-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stanisław Duer & Krzysztof Rokosz & Dariusz Bernatowicz & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Marek Woźniak & Konrad Zajkowski & Atif Iqbal, 2022. "Organization and Reliability Testing of a Wind Farm Device in Its Operational Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Stanisław Duer & Marek Woźniak & Jacek Paś & Konrad Zajkowski & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Marek Stawowy & Zbigniew Budniak, 2023. "Reliability Testing of Wind Farm Devices Based on the Mean Time to Failures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Oleg Gubarevych & Stanisław Duer & Inna Melkonova & Marek Woźniak & Jacek Paś & Marek Stawowy & Krzysztof Rokosz & Konrad Zajkowski & Dariusz Bernatowicz, 2023. "Research on and Assessment of the Reliability of Railway Transport Systems with Induction Motors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Stanisław Duer & Marek Woźniak & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Jacek Paś & Radosław Duer & Konrad Zajkowski & Dariusz Bernatowicz, 2022. "Assessment of the Reliability of Wind Farm Device on the Basis of Modeling Its Operation Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Stanisław Duer & Marek Woźniak & Jacek Paś & Konrad Zajkowski & Dariusz Bernatowicz & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Zbigniew Budniak, 2023. "Reliability Testing of Wind Farm Devices Based on the Mean Time between Failures (MTBF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Stanisław Duer & Krzysztof Rokosz & Konrad Zajkowski & Dariusz Bernatowicz & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Marek Woźniak & Atif Iqbal, 2022. "Intelligent Systems Supporting the Use of Energy Devices and Other Complex Technical Objects: Modeling, Testing, and Analysis of Their Reliability in the Operating Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-6, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanisław Duer & Jan Valicek & Jacek Paś & Marek Stawowy & Dariusz Bernatowicz & Radosław Duer & Marcin Walczak, 2021. "Neural Networks in the Diagnostics Process of Low-Power Solar Plant Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Stanisław Duer & Konrad Zajkowski & Marta Harničárová & Henryk Charun & Dariusz Bernatowicz, 2021. "Examination of Multivalent Diagnoses Developed by a Diagnostic Program with an Artificial Neural Network for Devices in the Electric Hybrid Power Supply System “House on Water”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Stanisław Duer & Marek Woźniak & Jacek Paś & Konrad Zajkowski & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Marek Stawowy & Zbigniew Budniak, 2023. "Reliability Testing of Wind Farm Devices Based on the Mean Time to Failures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Stanislaw Duer & Jacek Paś & Marek Stawowy & Aneta Hapka & Radosław Duer & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Marek Woźniak, 2022. "Reliability Testing of Wind Power Plant Devices with the Use of an Intelligent Diagnostic System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Stanisław Duer & Marek Woźniak & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Jacek Paś & Radosław Duer & Konrad Zajkowski & Dariusz Bernatowicz, 2022. "Assessment of the Reliability of Wind Farm Device on the Basis of Modeling Its Operation Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Stanisław Duer & Marek Woźniak & Jacek Paś & Konrad Zajkowski & Dariusz Bernatowicz & Arkadiusz Ostrowski & Zbigniew Budniak, 2023. "Reliability Testing of Wind Farm Devices Based on the Mean Time between Failures (MTBF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Ali, Sajid & Pievatolo, Antonio, 2018. "Time and magnitude monitoring based on the renewal reward process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 97-107.
    9. Torrado, Nuria, 2022. "Optimal component-type allocation and replacement time policies for parallel systems having multi-types dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    10. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    11. Zheng, Junjun & Okamura, Hiroyuki & Dohi, Tadashi, 2021. "Age replacement with Markovian opportunity process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. M D Pandey & T Cheng & J A M van der Weide, 2011. "Finite-time maintenance cost analysis of engineering systems affected by stochastic degradation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 241-250, June.
    13. Fu-Min Chang & Yu-Hung Chien, 2012. "Optimal Discrete-Time Periodic Replacement Policy For Repairable Products Under Free Minimal Repair Warranty," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 29(03), pages 1-14.
    14. Doostparast, Mohammad & Kolahan, Farhad & Doostparast, Mahdi, 2014. "A reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 98-106.
    15. Abdolsaeed Toomaj & Antonio Di Crescenzo, 2020. "Connections between Weighted Generalized Cumulative Residual Entropy and Variance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Ozkut, Murat, 2020. "Optimization problems for a parallel system with multiple types of dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    17. Krzysztof Jakubowski & Jacek Paś & Stanisław Duer & Jarosław Bugaj, 2021. "Operational Analysis of Fire Alarm Systems with a Focused, Dispersed and Mixed Structure in Critical Infrastructure Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Jarosław Łukasiak & Adam Rosiński & Michał Wiśnios, 2022. "The Issue of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Miniature Safety Fuses as Anti-Damage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    20. Zhang, Qin & Fang, Zhigeng & Cai, Jiajia, 2021. "Preventive replacement policies with multiple missions and maintenance triggering approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3860-:d:822674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.