IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2707-d550922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Point-of-View Energy Loss Analysis in a Refuse Truck Hydraulic System

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Javier Berne

    (CATMech, Department of Fluid Mechanics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Colom 7, 08222 Terrassa, Spain)

  • Gustavo Raush

    (CATMech, Department of Fluid Mechanics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Colom 7, 08222 Terrassa, Spain)

  • Pedro Javier Gamez-Montero

    (CATMech, Department of Fluid Mechanics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Colom 7, 08222 Terrassa, Spain)

  • Pedro Roquet

    (ROQCAR SL, Antonio Figueras 68, 08551 Tona, Spain)

  • Esteban Codina

    (CATMech, Department of Fluid Mechanics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Colom 7, 08222 Terrassa, Spain)

Abstract

In recent years, much research has focused on reducing the power consumption of mobile hydraulic machines due to rising fuel costs, regulations on combustion engine emissions and the need to reduce the size and weight of the storage devices in hybrid drives. Current approaches to improve the energy efficiency of a hydraulic system can be classified into four basic groups: reduction of the energy demand, recovery of part of the supplied energy (ERS systems), regeneration of part of the supplied energy and reuse of the recovered and regenerated energy (hybrid systems). Today’s mobile hydraulic systems are often complex, perform different tasks and work under different load conditions, which makes it difficult to analyse energy losses. A study of the energy losses of a hydraulic system from different points of view, such as an energy balance for a complete machine cycle, an analysis of the individual cycle phases and a power analysis for the different operation quadrants of the actuators, can give an global picture of the energy losses, being very useful to rate its energy efficiency, identify main power losses and decide which of the different energy-saving techniques to apply. This paper describes the data collection process, its analysis from various points of view and the summary of the results in easy to understand charts as useful tools to identify and quantify the main energy losses. Only system architecture losses are considered. Losses in the ICE engine or the electric motor, hydraulic pump losses and mechanical losses are outside the scope of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Javier Berne & Gustavo Raush & Pedro Javier Gamez-Montero & Pedro Roquet & Esteban Codina, 2021. "Multi-Point-of-View Energy Loss Analysis in a Refuse Truck Hydraulic System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2707-:d:550922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milos Vukovic & Roland Leifeld & Hubertus Murrenhoff, 2017. "Reducing Fuel Consumption in Hydraulic Excavators—A Comprehensive Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Roquet & Gustavo Raush & Luis Javier Berne & Pedro-Javier Gamez-Montero & Esteban Codina, 2022. "Energy Key Performance Indicators for Mobile Machinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Luis Javier Berne & Gustavo Raush & Pedro Roquet & Pedro-Javier Gamez-Montero & Esteban Codina, 2022. "Graphic Method to Evaluate Power Requirements of a Hydraulic System Using Load-Holding Valves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Vacca, 2018. "Energy Efficiency and Controllability of Fluid Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-6, May.
    2. Paolo Casoli & Fabio Scolari & Carlo Maria Vescovini & Massimo Rundo, 2022. "Energy Comparison between a Load Sensing System and Electro-Hydraulic Solutions Applied to a 9-Ton Excavator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Adam Wróblewski & Pavlo Krot & Radosław Zimroz & Timo Mayer & Jyri Peltola, 2023. "Review of Linear Electric Motor Hammers—An Energy-Saving and Eco-Friendly Solution in Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Luis Javier Berne & Gustavo Raush & Pedro Roquet & Pedro-Javier Gamez-Montero & Esteban Codina, 2022. "Graphic Method to Evaluate Power Requirements of a Hydraulic System Using Load-Holding Valves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Mirosław Przybysz & Marian Janusz Łopatka & Arkadiusz Rubiec & Piotr Krogul & Karol Cieślik & Marcin Małek, 2022. "Influence of Hydraulic Drivetrain Configuration on Kinematic Discrepancy and Energy Consumption during Obstacle Overcoming in a 6 × 6 All-Wheel Hydraulic Drive Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Kwangman An & Hyehyun Kang & Youngkuk An & Jinil Park & Jonghwa Lee, 2020. "Methodology of Excavator System Energy Flow-Down," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Ryo Arai & Satoru Sakai & Akihiro Tatsuoka & Qin Zhang, 2021. "Analytical, Experimental, and Numerical Investigation of Energy in Hydraulic Cylinder Dynamics of Agriculture Scale Excavators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Henrique Raduenz & Liselott Ericson & Victor J. De Negri & Petter Krus, 2022. "Multi-Chamber Actuator Mode Selection through Reinforcement Learning–Simulations and Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Chongbo Jing & Junjie Zhou & Shihua Yuan & Siyuan Zhao, 2018. "Research on the Pressure Ratio Characteristics of a Swash Plate-Rotating Hydraulic Transformer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.
    10. Xiaofan Guo & Jacob Lengacher & Andrea Vacca, 2022. "A Variable Pressure Multi-Pressure Rail System Design for Agricultural Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Daniele Beltrami & Paolo Iora & Laura Tribioli & Stefano Uberti, 2021. "Electrification of Compact Off-Highway Vehicles—Overview of the Current State of the Art and Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-30, September.
    12. Václav Mergl & Zdravko Pandur & Jan Klepárník & Hrvoje Kopseak & Marin Bačić & Marijan Šušnjar, 2021. "Technical Solutions of Forest Machine Hybridization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2707-:d:550922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.