IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i7p1849-d524956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refrigeration of COVID-19 Vaccines: Ideal Storage Characteristics, Energy Efficiency and Environmental Impacts of Various Vaccine Options

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre F. Santos

    (Department of Electromechanical Engineering, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
    FAPRO—Professional College, Curitiba 80230-040, Brazil)

  • Pedro D. Gaspar

    (Department of Electromechanical Engineering, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
    C-MAST—Centre for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Heraldo J. L. de Souza

    (FAPRO—Professional College, Curitiba 80230-040, Brazil)

Abstract

This article considers the ideal storage conditions for multiple vaccine brands, such as Pfizer, Moderna, CoronaVac, Oxford–AstraZeneca, Janssen COVID-19 and Sputnik V. Refrigerant fluid options for each storage condition, thermal load to cool each type of vaccine and environmental impacts of refrigerants are compared. An energy simulation using the EUED (energy usage effectiveness design) index was developed. The Oxford–AstraZeneca, Janssen COVID-19 and CoronaVac vaccines show 9.34-times higher energy efficiency than Pfizer. In addition, a TEWI (total equivalent warming impact) simulation was developed that prioritizes direct environmental impacts and indirect in refrigeration. From this analysis, it is concluded that the cold storage of Oxford–AstraZeneca, Janssen COVID-19 and CoronaVac vaccines in Brazil generates 35-times less environmental impact than the Pfizer vaccine.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre F. Santos & Pedro D. Gaspar & Heraldo J. L. de Souza, 2021. "Refrigeration of COVID-19 Vaccines: Ideal Storage Characteristics, Energy Efficiency and Environmental Impacts of Various Vaccine Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1849-:d:524956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Virginia Gewin, 2020. "Safely conducting essential research in the face of COVID-19," Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7804), pages 549-550, April.
    2. Alexandre F. Santos & Pedro D. Gaspar & Heraldo J. L. de Souza, 2020. "New HVAC Sustainability Index—TWI (Total Water Impact)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Jiang, Peng & Fan, Yee Van & Bokhari, Awais & Wang, Xue-Chao, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Peter Kurzweil & Alfred Müller & Steffen Wahler, 2021. "The Ecological Footprint of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Hervás-Zaragoza, Josep & Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Colmenar-Fernández, Lucía, 2022. "Microgrids as a mechanism for improving energy resilience during grid outages: A post COVID-19 case study for hospitals," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 308-319.
    4. Apostolos G. Christopoulos & Petros Kalantonis & Ioannis Katsampoxakis & Konstantinos Vergos, 2021. "COVID-19 and the Energy Price Volatility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Jiang, Peng & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Fan, Yee Van & Fu, Xiuju & Tan, Raymond R. & You, Siming & Foley, Aoife M., 2021. "Energy, environmental, economic and social equity (4E) pressures of COVID-19 vaccination mismanagement: A global perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyet Anh Dang & Rubianca Benavidez & Stephanie Anne Tomscha & Ho Nguyen & Dung Duc Tran & Diep Thi Hong Nguyen & Ho Huu Loc & Bethanna Marie Jackson, 2021. "Ecosystem Service Modelling to Support Nature-Based Flood Water Management in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Melendres, Clark N. & Lee, Ji Yong & Kim, Bongkyun & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2022. "Increasing yield and farm income of upland farmers: The case of Panay Island Upland Sustainable Rural Development Project in the Philippines," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1849-:d:524956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.