IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i15p4712-d607762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wake Width: Discussion of Several Methods How to Estimate It by Using Measured Experimental Data

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Duda

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitní 22, 306 14 Pilsen, Czech Republic)

  • Václav Uruba

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitní 22, 306 14 Pilsen, Czech Republic
    Institute of Thermomechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 5, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Vitalii Yanovych

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitní 22, 306 14 Pilsen, Czech Republic
    Institute of Thermomechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 5, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Several methods of defining and estimating the width of a turbulent wake are presented and tested on the experimental data obtained in the wake past an asymmetric prismatic airfoil NACA 64(3)-618, which is often used as tip profile of the wind turbines. Instantaneous velocities are measured by using the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique. All suggested methods of wake width estimation are based on the statistics of a stream-wise velocity component. First, the expansion of boundary layer (BL) thickness is tested, showing that both displacement BL thickness and momentum BL thickness do not represent the width of the wake. The equivalent of 99% BL thickness is used in the literature, but with different threshold value. It is shown that a lower threshold of 50% gives more stable results. The ensemble average velocity profile is fitted by Gauss function and its σ-parameter is used as another definition of wake width. The profiles of stream-wise velocity standard deviation display a two-peak shape; the distance of those peaks serves as wake width for Norberg, while another tested option is to include the widths of such peaks. Skewness (the third statistical moment) of stream-wise velocity displays a pair of sharp peaks in the wake boundary, but their position is heavily affected by the statistical quality of the data. Flatness (the fourth statistical moment) of the stream-wise velocity refers to the occurrence of rare events, and therefore the distance, where turbulent events ejected from the wake become rare and can be considered as another definition of wake width. The repeatability of the mentioned methods and their sensitivity to Reynolds’ number and model quality are discussed as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Duda & Václav Uruba & Vitalii Yanovych, 2021. "Wake Width: Discussion of Several Methods How to Estimate It by Using Measured Experimental Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4712-:d:607762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4712/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4712/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sidaard Gunasekaran & Aaron Altman, 2021. "Far Wake and Its Relation to Aerodynamic Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Du, Weikang & Zhao, Yongsheng & He, Yanping & Liu, Yadong, 2016. "Design, analysis and test of a model turbine blade for a wave basin test of floating wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 414-421.
    3. Xiawei Wu & Weihao Hu & Qi Huang & Cong Chen & Zhe Chen & Frede Blaabjerg, 2019. "Optimized Placement of Onshore Wind Farms Considering Topography," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Mamdouh Abdulrahman & David Wood, 2019. "Wind Farm Layout Upgrade Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Duda & Vitalii Yanovych & Volodymyr Tsymbalyuk & Václav Uruba, 2022. "Effect of Manufacturing Inaccuracies on the Wake Past Asymmetric Airfoil by PIV," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xinbao & Cai, Chang & Cai, Shang-Gui & Wang, Tengyuan & Wang, Zekun & Song, Juanjuan & Rong, Xiaomin & Li, Qing'an, 2023. "A review of aerodynamic and wake characteristics of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Daniel Duda & Vitalii Yanovych & Volodymyr Tsymbalyuk & Václav Uruba, 2022. "Effect of Manufacturing Inaccuracies on the Wake Past Asymmetric Airfoil by PIV," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Ali M. H. A. Khajah & Simon P. Philbin, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis and Modelling of the Feasibility of Wind Energy in Kuwait," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Andrés Ruiz & Florin Onea & Eugen Rusu, 2020. "Study Concerning the Expected Dynamics of the Wind Energy Resources in the Iberian Nearshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Katarzyna Wolniewicz & Adam Zagubień & Mirosław Wesołowski, 2021. "Energy and Acoustic Environmental Effective Approach for a Wind Farm Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Muhammad Nabeel Hussain & Nadeem Shaukat & Ammar Ahmad & Muhammad Abid & Abrar Hashmi & Zohreh Rajabi & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Micro-Siting of Wind Turbines in an Optimal Wind Farm Area Using Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Yao, Shulong & Griffith, D. Todd & Chetan, Mayank & Bay, Christopher J. & Damiani, Rick & Kaminski, Meghan & Loth, Eric, 2020. "A gravo-aeroelastically scaled wind turbine rotor at field-prototype scale with strict structural requirements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 535-547.
    8. Artur Amsharuk & Grażyna Łaska, 2022. "A Review: Existing Methods for Solving Spatial Planning Problems for Wind Turbines in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Florin Onea & Andrés Ruiz & Eugen Rusu, 2020. "An Evaluation of the Wind Energy Resources along the Spanish Continental Nearshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Chakib El Mokhi & Adnane Addaim, 2020. "Optimization of Wind Turbine Interconnections in an Offshore Wind Farm Using Metaheuristic Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Wen, Binrong & Tian, Xinliang & Dong, Xingjian & Li, Zhanwei & Peng, Zhike & Zhang, Wenming & Wei, Kexiang, 2020. "Design approaches of performance-scaled rotor for wave basin model tests of floating wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 573-584.
    12. Muhammad Nabeel Hussain & Nadeem Shaukat & Ammar Ahmad & Muhammad Abid & Abrar Hashmi & Zohreh Rajabi & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Effective Realization of Multi-Objective Elitist Teaching–Learning Based Optimization Technique for the Micro-Siting of Wind Turbines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Yang, Can & Cheng, Zhengshun & Xiao, Longfei & Tian, Xinliang & Liu, Mingyue & Wen, Binrong, 2022. "A gradient-descent-based method for design of performance-scaled rotor for floating wind turbine model testing in wave basins," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 144-155.
    14. Waldemar Kuczyński & Katarzyna Wolniewicz & Henryk Charun, 2021. "Analysis of the Wind Turbine Selection for the Given Wind Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Chen, Jianbing & Liu, Zenghui & Song, Yupeng & Peng, Yongbo & Li, Jie, 2022. "Experimental study on dynamic responses of a spar-type floating offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 560-578.
    16. Kaminski, Meghan & Loth, Eric & Griffith, D. Todd & Qin, Chao (Chris), 2020. "Ground testing of a 1% gravo-aeroelastically scaled additively-manufactured wind turbine blade with bio-inspired structural design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 639-650.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4712-:d:607762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.