IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p3833-d582259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving Integrated Daylighting and Electric Lighting Systems: Current State of the Art and Needed Research

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory D. Thomson

    (PlanArchology LLC, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA)

  • Robert G. Davis

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Portland, OR 97204, USA)

  • Luís Fernandes

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Taoning Wang

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a multi-disciplinary effort to clarify the state of the art and the state of practice, and necessary future research for creating the seamless integration and application of light in buildings, regardless of source, which is purposely modulated to illuminate surfaces and designed in a way that is comfortable, healthy, pleasing, cost-effective, and energy efficient. The authors unwrap the research, tools, and technical gaps preventing the full integration of electric lighting and daylighting with advanced façades through the coordination of lighting and windows research activities. The study and a stakeholder workshop captured current technology readiness levels (TRL), as well as research thrusts and implementation guidelines, and identified research priorities, presenting an analysis of the current landscape of lighting metrics—and which metrics are in the critical path for developing integrated daylighting and electric lighting systems, and their design, installation, and technology guidelines. In addition, the study defined stakeholder coordination, pathways to interoperable technology, and the value of viewing the work of the individual research areas holistically rather than in isolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory D. Thomson & Robert G. Davis & Luís Fernandes & Taoning Wang, 2021. "Achieving Integrated Daylighting and Electric Lighting Systems: Current State of the Art and Needed Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3833-:d:582259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3833/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3833/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alrubaih, M.S. & Zain, M.F.M. & Alghoul, M.A. & Ibrahim, N.L.N. & Shameri, M.A. & Elayeb, Omkalthum, 2013. "Research and development on aspects of daylighting fundamentals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 494-505.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allen Jong-Woei Whang & Tsai-Hsien Yang & Zhong-Hao Deng & Yi-Yung Chen & Wei-Chieh Tseng & Chun-Han Chou, 2019. "A Review of Daylighting System: For Prototype Systems Performance and Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-34, July.
    2. Sreelakshmi, Kavuthimadathil & Ramamurthy, K., 2022. "Review on fibre-optic-based daylight enhancement systems in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Mehdi Amirkhani & Veronica Garcia-Hansen & Gillian Isoardi & Alicia Allan, 2017. "An Energy Efficient Lighting Design Strategy to Enhance Visual Comfort in Offices with Windows," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    5. Yu, Xu & Su, Yuehong, 2015. "Daylight availability assessment and its potential energy saving estimation –A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 494-503.
    6. Salata, Ferdinando & Golasi, Iacopo & di Salvatore, Maicol & de Lieto Vollaro, Andrea, 2016. "Energy and reliability optimization of a system that combines daylighting and artificial sources. A case study carried out in academic buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 250-266.
    7. Paulína Šujanová & Monika Rychtáriková & Tiago Sotto Mayor & Affan Hyder, 2019. "A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    8. Su-In Yun & Kang-Soo Kim, 2018. "Sky Luminance Measurements Using CCD Camera and Comparisons with Calculation Models for Predicting Indoor Illuminance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Das, Aparna & Paul, Saikat Kumar, 2015. "Artificial illumination during daytime in residential buildings: Factors, energy implications and future predictions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 65-85.
    10. Jiraphorn Mahawan & Atthakorn Thongtha, 2021. "Experimental Investigation of Illumination Performance of Hollow Light Pipe for Energy Consumption Reduction in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Nasrollahi, Nazanin & Shokri, Elham, 2016. "Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 861-874.
    12. Galatioto, A. & Beccali, M., 2016. "Aspects and issues of daylighting assessment: A review study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 852-860.
    13. Gago, E.J. & Muneer, T. & Knez, M. & Köster, H., 2015. "Natural light controls and guides in buildings. Energy saving for electrical lighting, reduction of cooling load," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Atthakorn Thongtha & Piromporn Boontham, 2020. "Experimental Investigation of Natural Lighting Systems Using Cylindrical Glass for Energy Saving in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Loonen, R.C.G.M. & Trčka, M. & Cóstola, D. & Hensen, J.L.M., 2013. "Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 483-493.
    16. Wong, Ing Liang, 2017. "A review of daylighting design and implementation in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 959-968.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3833-:d:582259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.