IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i20p3892-d276536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on CBM of the Intelligent Substation SCADA System

Author

Listed:
  • Jyh-Cherng Gu

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Sec. 3, Keelung Road, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Chun-Hung Liu

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Sec. 3, Keelung Road, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Kai-Ying Chou

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Sec. 3, Keelung Road, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Ming-Ta Yang

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, St. John’s University, 499, Sec. 4, Tam King Road, Tamsui District, New Taipei City 25135, Taiwan)

Abstract

An equipment status management and maintenance platform of an intelligent substation monitoring and control system is built in the Tai-Tam substation of the Taipower company. The real-time operating status of the equipment, such as the server, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) human–machine interface (HMI) software, switches, intelligent electronic devices (IEDs), merging units (MUs), as well as the entire SCADA system, are evaluated comprehensively. First, the status information of all equipment is collected, and the theory of relative deterioration degree (RDD) and fuzzy theory (FT) are applied to calculate the fuzzy evaluation matrix of the equipment influencing factors. Then, the subjective analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the objective entropy method for weighting are combined to calculate the comprehensive weights of the equipment influencing factors. Finally, the result of the equipment status evaluation is obtained using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method and is presented at the equipment status management and maintenance platform. Such equipment status evaluation results can be used by the inspection and maintenance personnel to determine the priority for equipment maintenance and repair. The result of this study may serve as a valuable reference to utility companies when making maintenance plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyh-Cherng Gu & Chun-Hung Liu & Kai-Ying Chou & Ming-Ta Yang, 2019. "Research on CBM of the Intelligent Substation SCADA System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3892-:d:276536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masoud Asgarpour & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Bayesian Based Diagnostic Model for Condition Based Maintenance of Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Fenglan Tian & Zhongzhao Jing & Huan Zhao & Enze Zhang & Jiefeng Liu, 2019. "A Synthetic Condition Assessment Model for Power Transformers Using the Fuzzy Evidence Fusion Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Jannie S. Nielsen & John D. Sørensen, 2017. "Bayesian Estimation of Remaining Useful Life for Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Peng Qian & Xiange Tian & Jamil Kanfoud & Joash Lap Yan Lee & Tat-Hean Gan, 2019. "A Novel Condition Monitoring Method of Wind Turbines Based on Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Yi Yang & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2019. "Cost-Optimal Maintenance Planning for Defects on Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristini, Hélène & Kauppinen-Räisänen, Hannele, 2020. "Managing the transformation of the global commons into luxuries for all," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 467-473.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    2. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Juan Izquierdo & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Jone Uribetxebarria & Asier Erguido, 2019. "Framework for Managing Maintenance of Wind Farms Based on a Clustering Approach and Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    4. García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Peco Chacón, Ana María, 2020. "A review of non-destructive testing on wind turbines blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 998-1010.
    5. Dawid Augustyn & Martin D. Ulriksen & John D. Sørensen, 2021. "Reliability Updating of Offshore Wind Substructures by Use of Digital Twin Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Martyna Tomala & Andrzej Rusin & Adam Wojaczek, 2020. "Risk-Based Planning of Diagnostic Testing of Turbines Operating with Increased Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Ana Rita Nunes & Hugo Morais & Alberto Sardinha, 2021. "Use of Learning Mechanisms to Improve the Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbine Generators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Mikkel Schou Nielsen & Ivan Nikolov & Emil Krog Kruse & Jørgen Garnæs & Claus Brøndgaard Madsen, 2020. "High-Resolution Structure-from-Motion for Quantitative Measurement of Leading-Edge Roughness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Zhang, Chen & Gao, Wei & Yang, Tao & Guo, Sheng, 2019. "Opportunistic maintenance strategy for wind turbines considering weather conditions and spare parts inventory management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 703-711.
    10. Patrick D. Moroney & Amrit Shankar Verma, 2023. "Durability and Damage Tolerance Analysis Approaches for Wind Turbine Blade Trailing Edge Life Prediction: A Technical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-33, December.
    11. Xiyun Yang & Guo Fu & Yanfeng Zhang & Ning Kang & Feng Gao, 2017. "A Naive Bayesian Wind Power Interval Prediction Approach Based on Rough Set Attribute Reduction and Weight Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Nguyen, Thi-Anh-Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Developing an exhaustive optimal maintenance schedule for offshore wind turbines based on risk-assessment, technical factors and cost-effective evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    13. Yongfei Fu & Yuyu Liu & Shiguo Xu & Zhenghe Xu, 2022. "Assessment of a Multifunctional River Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model in Xiaoqing River, Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis & Nikos Papadakis & Ioannis Ntintakis, 2021. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Wind Turbine Blade Damage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-31, September.
    15. Antoine Chrétien & Antoine Tahan & Francis Pelletier, 2024. "Wind Turbine Blade Damage Evaluation under Multiple Operating Conditions and Based on 10-Min SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Rommel, D.P. & Di Maio, D. & Tinga, T., 2020. "Calculating wind turbine component loads for improved life prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 223-241.
    17. Florian, Eleonora & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Machine learning-based predictive maintenance: A cost-oriented model for implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    18. Li, Yanting & Jiang, Wenbo & Zhang, Guangyao & Shu, Lianjie, 2021. "Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on transfer learning and convolutional autoencoder with small-scale data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 103-115.
    19. Marcin Witczak & Marcin Mrugalski & Bogdan Lipiec, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of MOSFETs via the Takagi–Sugeno Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Jannie Sønderkær Nielsen & Lindsay Miller-Branovacki & Rupp Carriveau, 2021. "Probabilistic and Risk-Informed Life Extension Assessment of Wind Turbine Structural Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3892-:d:276536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.