IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v10y2022i5p117-d817329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Green Innovation in the Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Novitasari

    (Accounting Department, Universitas PGRI Madiun, Setia Budi 85, Kota Madiun 63118, Indonesia)

  • Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan

    (Master of Management Department, Petra Christian University, Siwalankerto 121-131, Surabaya 60236, Indonesia)

Abstract

Indonesia’s government policy recommends that medium and large companies carry out corporate social responsibility programs. These programs provide sustainability for the company because they can involve community social relations, economic growth, and increasing environmental awareness. This study aimed to test corporate social responsibility on firm performance with green innovation as a mediation. This study used PROPER companies in 2015–2019, which were chosen using a purposive sampling method involving annual reports and financial reports, yielding 253 companies as a sample. Data were obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange and tested using STATA. This study indicates that corporate social responsibility can increase green innovation in companies with the stability of environmentally friendly materials, emission reductions for the surrounding community, and saving energy use. Corporate social responsibility has a positive effect on firm performance because the company has maintained the continuity of the process. After all, it has a harmonious relationship with the community. Furthermore, green innovation positively affects firm performance because the company can reduce energy use and utilize environmentally friendly resources. Therefore, green innovation can mediate the influence of corporate social responsibility and firm performance. This research contributes to senior managers who are part of their company’s top management to understand the critical role of corporate social responsibility in maintaining the company’s sustainability by paying attention to the part of the company’s environment and implementing government regulations. Corporate social responsibility can maintain good stakeholder relations and increase green innovation and firm performance. Theoretical contributions can enrich research related to the context of sustainable performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Novitasari & Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan, 2022. "The Role of Green Innovation in the Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Performance," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:5:p:117-:d:817329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/5/117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/5/117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying-Chin Ho & Wen Bo Wang & Wen Ling Shieh, 2016. "An empirical study of green management and performance in Taiwanese electronics firms," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1266787-126, December.
    2. Guichuan Zhou & Lan Zhang & Liming Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility, the Atmospheric Environment, and Technological Innovation Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Jhunru Zhang & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Terri Trireksani, 2019. "Corporate sustainability disclosure’s importance in China: financial analysts’ perception," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(8), pages 1169-1189, August.
    4. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    2. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    3. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Jonathan Cuevas Lizama, 2022. "Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Nguyen Thi Canh & Nguyen Thanh Liem & Phung Anh Thu & Nguyen Vinh Khuong, 2019. "The Impact of Innovation on the Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, July.
    5. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    6. Ma Zhong & Rong Xu & Xinyi Liao & Shuangli Zhang, 2019. "Do CSR Ratings Converge in China? A Comparison Between RKS and Hexun Scores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Jassem Suaad & Zakaria Zarina & Che Azmi Anna, 2020. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 193-210, January.
    8. Umar Ali Bukar & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rozi Nor Haizan Nor & Salfarina Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Mustafa Alabadla & Ali Alkhalifah, 2022. "How Advanced Technological Approaches Are Reshaping Sustainable Social Media Crisis Management and Communication: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Rui Silva & Cidália Oliveira, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation in Tangible and Intangible Resource Allocation: A Qualitative Multi Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Samara da Silva Neiva & Ramaswamy Arun Prasath & Wellyngton Silva de Amorim & Mauricio de Andrade Lima & Samuel Borges Barbosa & João Marcelo Pereira Ribeiro & Flávio Ceci & Jonas Schneider & André Bo, 2021. "Sustainable urban development: Can the balanced scorecard contribute to the strategic management of sustainable cities?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1155-1172, November.
    11. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2022. "An Empirical Framework for Assessing the Balanced Scorecard Impact on Sustainable Development in Healthcare Performance Measurement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Mohamed Santigie Kanu, 2021. "A Theoretical Framework for Enterprise Risk Management and Organizational Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(5), pages 1-63, May.
    13. Krongthong Heebkhoksung & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "A New Paradigm of a Sustainability-Balanced Scorecard Model for Sport Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Jay L. Brand & Sally Augustin, 2021. "Can We Sustain Sustainability? A Critical Synthesis of Pertinent Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-8, November.
    15. Regina F. Bento & Lasse Mertins & Lourdes F. White, 2017. "Ideology and the Balanced Scorecard: An Empirical Exploration of the Tension Between Shareholder Value Maximization and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 769-789, June.
    16. Xiaode Ji & Yanzhao Su & Yue Zhang & Hui Wang, 2023. "Making Our Firm More Sustainable: The Role of CEO Vision Communication of Sustainability on Sustainability Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    17. Chen-Yueh Chen & Ya-Lun Chou & Chun-Shih Lee, 2021. "Social Innovation, Employee Value Cocreation, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Sport-Related Social Enterprise: Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-10, November.
    18. Simon Cornée & Madeg Le Guernic & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Governing Common-Property Assets: Theory and Evidence from Agriculture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 691-710, November.
    19. Gérald Naro & Denis Travaillé, 2021. "La responsabilité sociale de l'enseignant chercheur en contrôle de gestion," Post-Print hal-03277485, HAL.
    20. Kraus, Sascha & Rehman, Shafique Ur & García, F. Javier Sendra, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:5:p:117-:d:817329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.