IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdisab/v1y2021i4p33-480d699402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of an Assistive Instrument for Physical Therapists with Visual Impairment to Conduct the Muscle Tightness Test

Author

Listed:
  • Shinsuke Tamai

    (Doctoral Program in Sports Medicine, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
    Clinical Center for Medicine, Welfare and Health, Chiba 263-0021, Japan)

  • Shusei Kuroda

    (Kobe City School for the Visually Impaired, Kobe 650-0044, Japan)

  • Takayuki Yabe

    (Tottori Prefectural School for the Visually Impaired, Tottori 680-0151, Japan)

  • Tsunehiko Wada

    (Acupuncture and Physical Therapy Teacher Training School, University of Tsukuba, Bunkyo 112-0012, Japan
    Department of Disability Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan)

Abstract

Disability sports have been globally promoted to achieve an inclusive society. However, the current opportunities for people with disabilities are few in terms of participating in supporting positions, such as athletic trainers. In Japan, many people with visual impairment (VI) work as physical therapists; thus, they can become active as medical staff in the sports field. An example of a medical assessment is the muscle tightness test (MTT); however, conducting it is expected to be difficult for people with VI. To improve this difficulty, the current study developed an assistive instrument (AsI) and examined its effectiveness. We recruited 22 physical therapists with VI. The measurement for MTT targeted the hamstrings, iliopsoas, gastrocnemius, and quadriceps. The participants performed the MTT using a universal goniometer (UG) and the AsI and filled up a questionnaire. AsI was compared against UG based on three aspects, namely, ease, accuracy, and measurement time. In terms of ease, significant differences were observed in 9 out of 12 questionnaire items. The mean (SD) score for “Comprehensive ease of the MTT” improved from 2.8 (1.0) to 3.9 (0.8). For accuracy, the AsI yielded a decrease in the total error of the measurement. Lastly, the measurement time for AsI was longer than that for the UG. Therefore, the AsI was effective in terms of ease and accuracy, whereas measurement time remained as an issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Shinsuke Tamai & Shusei Kuroda & Takayuki Yabe & Tsunehiko Wada, 2021. "Effectiveness of an Assistive Instrument for Physical Therapists with Visual Impairment to Conduct the Muscle Tightness Test," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:1:y:2021:i:4:p:33-480:d:699402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/1/4/33/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/1/4/33/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tracey J. Dickson & Simon Darcy & Raechel Johns & Caitlin Pentifallo, 2016. "Inclusive by design: transformative services and sport-event accessibility," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(11-12), pages 532-555, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tracey J. Dickson & Simon Darcy & Chelsey Walker, 2020. "A Case of Leveraging a Mega-Sport Event for a Sport Participation and Sport Tourism Legacy: A Prospective Longitudinal Case Study of Whistler Adaptive Sports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Itsuro Kaneyama & Kunio Shirahada, 2022. "Eudemonic Servicescapes: Value Co-Creation in Karate Dojos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:1:y:2021:i:4:p:33-480:d:699402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.