IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v6y2024i1p14-298d1348412.html

Delamination Techniques of Waste Solar Panels: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Ghahremani

    (The School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia)

  • Scott D. Adams

    (The School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia)

  • Michael Norton

    (The School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia)

  • Sui Yang Khoo

    (The School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia)

  • Abbas Z. Kouzani

    (The School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia)

Abstract

Solar panels are an environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels; however, their useful life is limited to approximately 25 years, after which they become a waste management issue. Proper management and recycling of end-of-life (EOL) solar panels are paramount. It protects the environment because of the high energy consumption of silicon production. We can effectively decrease energy and cost requirements by recovering silicon from recycled solar panels. This is one-third of those needed for manufacturing silicon directly. Moreover, solar panels include heavy metals, such as lead, tin, and cadmium, which pose risks to human health and the environment. Empirical evidence suggests that the costs of mining materials can exceed those of recycled materials, thereby making recycling a more cost-effective means of resource harvesting. This review paper focuses on the techniques developed to delaminate solar panels, which are considered a crucial step in the recycling of EOL solar panels. Initially, various classifications of solar panels are given. Subsequently, an analysis of the diverse methods of solar panel delamination and their efficacy in the retrieval of valued materials is presented. This investigation has identified three primary modes of delamination, namely mechanical, thermal, and chemical. Among these, mechanical delamination is deemed to be a sustainable and cost-effective option when compared to thermal and chemical delamination. The current most popular method of thermal delamination is characterized by its high energy consumption and potential emission, and the chemical delamination generates hazardous liquids that pose their own threat to the environment. This study emphasizes the mechanical delamination techniques, characterized by their environmentally friendly nature, minimal ecological footprint, and capacity to retrieve entire glass panels intact. This paper also discusses the current gaps and potential enhancements for mechanical delamination techniques. For example, some delamination techniques result in crushed materials. Thus, the handling and recovery of materials such as glass and silicon cells require the implementation of an appropriate sorting technique. Also, the value obtained from recovering crushed materials is lower than that of intact glass and silicon cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Ghahremani & Scott D. Adams & Michael Norton & Sui Yang Khoo & Abbas Z. Kouzani, 2024. "Delamination Techniques of Waste Solar Panels: A Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:14-298:d:1348412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fine, Jamie P. & Dworkin, Seth B. & Friedman, Jacob, 2019. "A methodology for predicting hybrid solar panel performance in different operating modes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1198-1206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Surya Dev Singh & Pradyut Anand & Mario Di Nardo & Abhishek Kumar Singh & Shatrudhan Pandey, 2025. "Challenges and Opportunities in Recycling Technology of Silicon-Based Photovoltaic Solar Panels: A Systematic Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(8), pages 7283-7328, December.
    2. Amjad Ali & Muhammad Shahid & Sikandar Abdul Qadir & Md Tasbirul Islam & Muhammad Waseem Khan & Shoaib Ahmed, 2024. "Solar PV End-of-Life Waste Recycling: An Assessment of Mechanical Recycling Methods and Proposed Hybrid Laser and High Voltage Pulse Crushing Method," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Mukwevho, Nehemiah & Mkhohlakali, Andile & Ntsasa, Napo & Sehata, James & Chimuka, Luke & Tshilongo, James & Letsoalo, Mokgehle R., 2025. "Methodological approaches for resource recovery from end-of-life panels of different generations of photovoltaic technologies – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strušnik, Dušan & Brandl, Daniel & Schober, Helmut & Ferčec, Janko & Avsec, Jurij, 2020. "A simulation model of the application of the solar STAF panel heat transfer and noise reduction with and without a transparent plate: A renewable energy review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Wei-Hsiang Chiang & Han-Sheng Wu & Jong-Shinn Wu & Shiow-Jyu Lin, 2022. "A Method for Estimating On-Field Photovoltaics System Efficiency Using Thermal Imaging and Weather Instrument Data and an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Sohani, Ali & Sayyaadi, Hoseyn, 2020. "Providing an accurate method for obtaining the efficiency of a photovoltaic solar module," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 395-406.
    4. Md Tofael Ahmed & Masud Rana Rashel & Mahmudul Islam & A. K. M. Kamrul Islam & Mouhaydine Tlemcani, 2024. "Classification and Parametric Analysis of Solar Hybrid PVT System: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:14-298:d:1348412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.