IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v15y2024i3p33-d1422707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous Strategies for Managing Bush Encroachment in Rural Areas of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Tshidi Mokgatsane Baloyi

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Thabang Maphanga

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Benett Siyabonga Madonsela

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Qolani Golden Mongwe

    (Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism, Polokwane 0700, South Africa)

  • Karabo Concelia Malakane

    (Department of Biodiversity, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Limpopo, Polokwane 0727, South Africa)

  • Xolisiwe Sinalo Grangxabe

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Babalwa Gqomfa

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

Abstract

The integration of indigenous knowledge systems into the discussion of bush encroachment management is of paramount importance. Indigenous knowledge and formal monitoring may be mutually beneficial, and using both approaches can improve natural resource management. Savannah rangeland landscapes hold deep cultural and spiritual significance for indigenous communities, and their perceptions can provide valuable insights into creating more effective, community-driven conservation initiatives. This study was aimed at filling the existing knowledge and research gap on bush encroachment control by focusing on the integration of indigenous knowledge systems. To achieve this, the current research included three distinct non-probability sampling strategies: (1) Purposive, (2) Snowball, (3) Convenience sampling methods. The results showed that 90.3% of the participants indicated that the main encroaching species of concern was sickle bush ( Dichrostachys cinerea ) and it is therefore perceived as a problem in the rangeland. The majority of farmer respondents indicated that they cut the encroacher plant down, uproot all root systems, then burn the remaining roots. This is reported to be a more effective way of managing sickle bush as an encroacher plant. Both genders generally believe in the efficacy of these systems, with variations in levels of agreement. However, a gender disparity emerges in opinions on incorporating communal-based approaches, emphasizing the need to consider gender perspectives in environmental management initiatives. Therefore, considering this, the study concludes that a holistic approach, integrating both formal and informal knowledge systems, may be crucial for sustainable and effective management strategies. Given that, recognizing the diversity of perspectives within the community, particularly regarding gender differences, is essential for developing inclusive and community-driven environmental management initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tshidi Mokgatsane Baloyi & Thabang Maphanga & Benett Siyabonga Madonsela & Qolani Golden Mongwe & Karabo Concelia Malakane & Xolisiwe Sinalo Grangxabe & Babalwa Gqomfa, 2024. "Indigenous Strategies for Managing Bush Encroachment in Rural Areas of South Africa," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:33-:d:1422707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/3/33/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/3/33/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Brodt, 1999. "Interactions of formal and informal knowledge systems in village-based tree management in central India," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 16(4), pages 355-363, December.
    2. Stafford, William & Birch, Catherine & Etter, Hannes & Blanchard, Ryan & Mudavanhu, Shepherd & Angelstam, Per & Blignaut, James & Ferreira, Louwrens & Marais, Christo, 2017. "The economics of landscape restoration: Benefits of controlling bush encroachment and invasive plant species in South Africa and Namibia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 193-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares & María Méndez-López & Isabel Díaz-Reviriego & Marissa McBride & Aili Pyhälä & Antoni Rosell-Melé & Victoria Reyes-García, 2015. "Links between media communication and local perceptions of climate change in an indigenous society," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 307-320, July.
    2. del Río-Mena, Trinidad & Willemen, Louise & Vrieling, Anton & Nelson, Andy, 2023. "How remote sensing choices influence ecosystem services monitoring and evaluation results of ecological restoration interventions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Razafindratsima, Onja H. & Kamoto, Judith F.M. & Sills, Erin O. & Mutta, Doris N. & Song, Conghe & Kabwe, Gillian & Castle, Sarah E. & Kristjanson, Patricia M. & Ryan, Casey M. & Brockhaus, Maria & Su, 2021. "Reviewing the evidence on the roles of forests and tree-based systems in poverty dynamics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Isabelle Kunze, 2017. "Dualisms shaping human-nature relations: discovering the multiple meanings of social-ecological change in Wayanad," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 983-994, December.
    5. Israel Ropo Orimoloye & Leocadia Zhou & Ahmed M. Kalumba, 2021. "Drought Disaster Risk Adaptation through Ecosystem Services-Based Solutions: Way Forward for South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Khuliso Emmanuel Ravhuhali & Humbelani Silas Mudau & Bethwell Moyo & Onke Hawu & Ntokozo Happy Msiza, 2021. "Prosopis Species—An Invasive Species and a Potential Source of Browse for Livestock in Semi-Arid Areas of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Tshepiso Mangani & Hendri Coetzee & Klaus Kellner & George Chirima, 2020. "Socio-Economic Benefits Stemming from Bush Clearing and Restoration Projects Conducted in the D’Nyala Nature Reserve and Shongoane Village, Lephalale, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Paul Robbins, 2002. "Obstacles to a First World Political Ecology? Looking near without Looking up," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1509-1513, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:33-:d:1422707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.