Author
Listed:
- Yanbiao Wang
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Haiyan Li
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Yuanbo Jiang
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Yaya Duan
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Yi Ling
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Minhua Yin
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Yanlin Ma
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Yanxia Kang
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Yayu Wang
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Guangping Qi
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Guoyun Shen
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Gansu Province Jingtai Chuan Power Irrigation Water Resource Utilization Center, Baiyin 730400, China)
- Boda Li
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Jinxi Chen
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Huile Lv
(College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
Abstract
Scientific nitrogen management is essential for maximizing crop growth potential while minimizing resource waste and environmental impacts. Alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) is the most widely cultivated high-quality leguminous forage crop globally, and is capable of providing nitrogen through nitrogen fixation. However, there remains some disagreement regarding its nitrogen management strategies. This study conducted a three-year field experiment and calibrated the APSIM-Lucerne model. Based on the calibrated model, three typical precipitation year types (dry, normal, and wet years) were selected. Combining field experiments, eight nitrogen application scenarios (0, 80, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, and 240 kg·ha −1 ) were set up. With the objectives of increasing alfalfa yield, nitrogen partial productivity, and nitrogen agronomic efficiency, this study investigates the appropriate nitrogen application thresholds for alfalfa under different precipitation year types. The results showed the following: (1) Alfalfa yield increased first and then decreased with the increase in nitrogen application level. The annual yield of the N160 treatment was the highest (13.39 t·ha −1 ), which was 5.15% to 32.39% higher than that of the other treatments. (2) The APSIM-Lucerne model could well reflect the growth process and yield of alfalfa under different precipitation year types. The R 2 and NRMSE between the simulated and observed values of the former were 0.85–0.91 and 5.33–7.44%, respectively. The R 2 and NRMSE between the simulated and measured values of the latter were 0.74–0.96 and 2.73–5.25%, respectively. (3) Under typical dry, normal, and wet years, the optimal nitrogen application rates for alfalfa yield increases were 120 kg·ha −1 , 140 kg·ha −1 , and 160 kg·ha −1 , respectively. This study can provide a basis for precise nitrogen management of alfalfa under different precipitation year types.
Suggested Citation
Yanbiao Wang & Haiyan Li & Yuanbo Jiang & Yaya Duan & Yi Ling & Minhua Yin & Yanlin Ma & Yanxia Kang & Yayu Wang & Guangping Qi & Guoyun Shen & Boda Li & Jinxi Chen & Huile Lv, 2025.
"Using APSIM Model to Optimize Nitrogen Application for Alfalfa Yield Under Different Precipitation Regimes,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1789-:d:1729508
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1789-:d:1729508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.