IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i16p1714-d1720343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Comparative Experimental Study of Air-Suction Mulai-Arm Potato Planter

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxin Zhu

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Pinyan Lyu

    (College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin 130118, China)

  • Qiang Gao

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Haiqin Ma

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yuxuan Chen

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yu Qi

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Jicheng Li

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Jinqing Lyu

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

China ranks as the world’s leading potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) producer, while the poor seeding machinery performance limited a higher input–output ratio in potato cultivation and impeded sustainable development. We developed an advanced air-suction mulai-arm potato planter (ASPP) that incorporated integrated side-deep fertilization, automated seed feeding, negative-pressure seed filling, seed transportation, positive-pressure seed delivery, soil covering, and compaction. The study proposes a Negative-pressure seed extraction mechanism that minimizes seed damage by precisely controlling suction pressure, and the near-zero-speed seed delivery mechanism synchronizes seed release with ground speed, reducing bounce-induced spacing errors. Furthermore, the structural configuration and operation principle of ASPP were systematically elucidated, and key performance parameters and optimal values were identified. We conducted a randomized complete block design plot trial comparing the spoon-belt potato planter (SBPP) and spoon-chain potato planter (SCPP), evaluating sowing quality, seedling emergence rate ( ER ), potato yield ( PY ), and comprehensive economic benefits. The results revealed that plant spacing index ( PSI ), missed-seeding index ( MI ), re-seeding index ( RI ), and coefficient of variation ( CV ) of ASPP were 90.05%, 3.78%, 2.32%, and 7.93%, respectively. The mean ER values for ASPP, SBPP, and SCPP were 94.76%, 85.42%, and 83.46%, respectively, with the ASPP showing improvements of 10.93% and 13.54% over SBPP and SCPP. However, the SBPP and SCPP exhibited greater emergence uniformity than ASPP. The mean PY value was 37,205.25, 32,973.75, and 34,620 kg·ha −1 for ASPP, SBPP, and SCPP. The ASPP outperformed the SBPP and SCPP by 12.83% and 7.47%. Overall, ASPP demonstrated balanced and superior performance across the above-mentioned indicators, demonstrating its potential to enable precision agriculture in tuber crop cultivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxin Zhu & Pinyan Lyu & Qiang Gao & Haiqin Ma & Yuxuan Chen & Yu Qi & Jicheng Li & Jinqing Lyu, 2025. "Design and Comparative Experimental Study of Air-Suction Mulai-Arm Potato Planter," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1714-:d:1720343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/16/1714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/16/1714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1714-:d:1720343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.