IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i11p1117-d1661954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the Chinese Cultural Consumption Pilot Policy Facilitate Sustainable Development in the Agritourism Economy?

Author

Listed:
  • Hanlian Lin

    (School of Law, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Haibo Chen

    (School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Hua Tang

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    School of Business, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Mo Chen

    (School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

The growing importance of cultural consumption in driving tourism development is reflected in its expanding scale and the simultaneous transformation and upgrading of the cultural industry. This study adopts a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model to leverage the quasi-natural experiment created by China’s national cultural consumption pilot policy. Using panel data from 30 provinces spanning the period from 2011 to 2024, we quantitatively assess the policy’s impact on sustainable development within the agritourism economy. Specifically, the study aims to isolate and identify the net effect of the pilot policy on improving the quality and sustainability of agritourism outcomes. Empirical results demonstrate that the implementation of the national cultural consumption pilot policy significantly promotes the development of sustainable agritourism products. Moreover, the policy exerts a notable positive influence on the broader sustainable development of the agritourism economy. These effects are particularly pronounced in the eastern and central regions, while the western region exhibits comparatively weaker impacts. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that the limited effectiveness observed in the western and parts of the central regions may be attributed to constraints such as lower levels of economic development and weaker performance of control variables in promoting sustainability. Overall, this study provides robust empirical evidence supporting the wider implementation and promotion of cultural consumption pilot policies at the national level. The findings offer valuable policy implications for advancing sustainability in the agritourism sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanlian Lin & Haibo Chen & Hua Tang & Mo Chen, 2025. "Can the Chinese Cultural Consumption Pilot Policy Facilitate Sustainable Development in the Agritourism Economy?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1117-:d:1661954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qi Wang & Qunli Tang & Yingting Guo, 2024. "Spatial Interaction Spillover Effect of Tourism Eco-Efficiency and Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Galdini, Rossana, 2007. "Tourism And The City: Opportunity For Regeneration," MPRA Paper 6370, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Alina Emilia Maria Gherdan & Ramona Vasilica Bacter & Ramona Ciolac & Tiberiu Iancu & Cristina Maria Maerescu & Monica Angelica Dodu & Aurelia Ioana Chereji & Vasile Grigore Herman & Alexandra Ungurea, 2025. "Sustainable Agritourism Development in Romania’s North-West Mountain Region: A TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of Strategic Priorities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Rui Alexandre Castanho & Carlos Santos & Gualter Couto, 2023. "Creative Tourism in Islands and Regional Sustainable Development: What Can We Learn from the Pilot Projects Implemented in the Azores Territory?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Levinus Chassang & Chi-Jen Hsieh & Tzu-Ning Li & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2024. "Feasibility Assessment of Stakeholder Benefits in Community-Based Agritourism through University Social Responsibility Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Manolis Manioudis & Giorgos Meramveliotakis, 2022. "Broad strokes towards a grand theory in the analysis of sustainable development: a return to the classical political economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 866-878, September.
    7. Huali Pan & Huanhuan Mi & Yanhua Chen & Ziyan Chen & Weizhong Zhou, 2024. "Measurement and Evaluation of the Development Level of Health and Wellness Tourism from the Perspective of High-Quality Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Connell, John, 2013. "Contemporary medical tourism: Conceptualisation, culture and commodification," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Die Li & Sumin Hu, 2021. "How Does Technological Innovation Mediate the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Xiao, Lu & Liu, Jianyue & Ge, Jinwen, 2021. "Dynamic game in agriculture and industry cross-sectoral water pollution governance in developing countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Richard Welford & Bjarne Ytterhus & Jason Eligh, 1999. "Tourism and sustainable development: an analysis of policy and guidelines for managing provision and consumption," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(4), pages 165-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Yang & Jingye Li & Stefan Sieber & Kaisheng Long, 2025. "Does Digital Village Construction Affect the Sustainable Intensification of Cultivated Land Use? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet & Francisco de Borja García-García, 2023. "Rural-Urban Linkages: Regional Financial Business Services’ Integration into Chilean Agri-Food Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Hui Wang & Yao Xu, 2024. "Optimized Decision-Making for Multi-Market Green Power Transactions of Electricity Retailers under Demand-Side Response: The Chinese Market Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Pravee Kruachottikul & Pinnaree Tea-makorn & Poomsiri Dumrongvute & Solaphat Hemrungrojn & Natawut Nupairoj & Ornsiree Junchaya & Sukrit Vinayavekhin, 2024. "MediGate: a MedTech product innovation development process from university research to successful commercialization within emerging markets," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-43, December.
    5. Laura Kemppainen & Veera Koskinen & Harley Bergroth & Eetu Marttila & Teemu Kemppainen, 2021. "Health and Wellness–Related Travel: A Scoping Study of the Literature in 2010-2018," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    6. Izabela Zabielska & Grażyna Kowalewska, 2024. "Employment of Migrants as a Response to the Needs of Entrepreneurs in Rural Border Regions—Examples from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Yanfei Zhou, 2024. "Driving determinants and assessment of the coupling coordination of regional technological innovation-industrial upgrading-eco-environment system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6269-6291, March.
    8. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Chenchen Yang & Junfeng Dong & Jingjing Hao, 2019. "Cooperation Contracts Between Small and Major Scenic Spots in Peak Seasons," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    10. Xuan Liu & Xuexi Huo, 2024. "Green Finance, Land Transfer and China’s Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Csapó János & Marton Gergely, 2017. "The Role and Importance of Spa and Wellness Tourism in Hungary's Tourism Industry," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 55-68, June.
    12. Francisco Núñez & Elías Albornoz & Mariella Gutiérrez & Antonio Zumelzu, 2022. "Socially Sustainable Accessibility to Goods and Services in the Metropolitan Area of Concepción, Chile, Post-COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Songtao He & Shuigen Yang & Amar Razzaq & Sahar Erfanian & Azhar Abbas, 2023. "Mechanism and Impact of Digital Economy on Urban Economic Resilience under the Carbon Emission Scenarios: Evidence from China’s Urban Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Yingzhu Yang & Lexiang Zhao & Feng Cui, 2022. "How Does Public Health Investment Affect Subjective Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Zohreh Amiri Sardari & Tayebeh Abdoli Mohamadabadi & Javad Nazarian-Jashnabadi & Giovanni Tesoriere & Tiziana Campisi, 2024. "Smart Experience and Green Health Tourism: The Moderating Role of Content Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Kamran Khan & Thomas Henschel, 2024. "LCT-Based Framework for the Assessment of Sustainability: From the Perspective of Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Dnyaneshwar Jivanrao Ghode & Vinod Yadav & Rakesh Jain & Gunjan Soni, 2025. "Integrated framework for supply chain with blockchain technology: a manufacturers’ perspective," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Li, Dandan & Wu, Qiongzi & Han, Dun, 2025. "On evolution of agent behavior under limited gaming time with reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    19. Pei Duan & Kangkang Wu, 2025. "Afforestation Through Sand Control: Farmer Participation Under China’s New Round of Grain-for-Green Compensation Policy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Laima Česonienė & Daiva Šileikienė & Vitas Marozas & Laura Čiteikė, 2021. "Influence of Anthropogenic Loads on Surface Water Status: A Case Study in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1117-:d:1661954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.