IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1285-d1449729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refinement of Cropland Data Layer with Effective Confidence Layer Interval and Image Filtering

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Maleki

    (SNARS Laboratory, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Falin Wu

    (SNARS Laboratory, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Amel Oubara

    (SNARS Laboratory, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Loghman Fathollahi

    (Meteorological Department of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran Meteorological Organization (IRIMO), Orumiyeh 670056, Iran)

  • Gongliu Yang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China)

Abstract

Various systems have been developed to process agricultural land data for better management of crop production. One such system is Cropland Data Layer (CDL), produced by the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The CDL has been widely used for training deep learning (DL) segmentation models. However, it contains various errors, such as salt-and-pepper noise, and must be refined before being used in DL training. In this study, we used two approaches to refine the CDL for DL segmentation of major crops from a time series of Sentinel-2 monthly composite images. Firstly, different confidence intervals of the confidence layer were used to refine the CDL. Secondly, several image filters were employed to improve data quality. The refined CDLs were then used as the ground-truth in DL segmentation training and evaluation. The results demonstrate that the CDL with +45% and +55% confidence intervals produced the best results, improving the accuracy of DL segmentation by approximately 1% compared to non-refined data. Additionally, filtering the CDL using the majority and expand–shrink filters yielded the best performance, enhancing the evaluation metrics by about 1.5%. The findings suggest that pre-filtering the CDL and selecting an effective confidence interval can significantly improve DL segmentation performance, contributing to more accurate and reliable agricultural monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Maleki & Falin Wu & Amel Oubara & Loghman Fathollahi & Gongliu Yang, 2024. "Refinement of Cropland Data Layer with Effective Confidence Layer Interval and Image Filtering," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1285-:d:1449729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Runwei & Wei, Chenyang & Afroz, Mahnaz Dil & Lyu, Jun & Chen, Gang, 2021. "A GIS-based framework for local agricultural decision-making and regional crop yield simulation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Larsen, Ashley E. & Hendrickson, Brandon T. & Dedeic, Nicholas & MacDonald, Andrew J., 2015. "Taken as a given: Evaluating the accuracy of remotely sensed crop data in the USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 121-125.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengnan Xiao & Peng Qian & Jie Xu & Mengyao Lu, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Application of Remote Sensing in Crop Spatial Patterns: Current Status, Progress and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Pomi Shahbaz & Shamsheer ul Haq & Azhar Abbas & Zahira Batool & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Roshan K. Nayak, 2022. "Adoption of Climate Smart Agricultural Practices through Women Involvement in Decision Making Process: Exploring the Role of Empowerment and Innovativeness," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Mwehe Mathenge & Ben G. J. S. Sonneveld & Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, 2022. "Application of GIS in Agriculture in Promoting Evidence-Informed Decision Making for Improving Agriculture Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Yu, Qihua & Wang, Feng & Zou, Minzhong & Ji, Shasha & Li, Mingfa & Kang, Shaozhong, 2024. "Quantifying the spatial water salinity threshold of saline water irrigation by applying distributed WAVES model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    5. Kenneth Lee Copenhaver, 2022. "Combining Tabular and Satellite-Based Datasets to Better Understand Cropland Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1285-:d:1449729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.