IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i8p1530-d1207984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inversion Model of Salt Content in Alfalfa-Covered Soil Based on a Combination of UAV Spectral and Texture Information

Author

Listed:
  • Wenju Zhao

    (College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China)

  • Fangfang Ma

    (College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China)

  • Haiying Yu

    (College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China)

  • Zhaozhao Li

    (College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how the combination of texture information and spectral index affects the accuracy of the soil salinity inversion model. Taking the Bianwan Farm in Jiuquan City, Gansu Province, China as the research area, the multi-spectral data and soil salinity data at 0–15 cm, 15–30 cm and 30–50 cm depths in the sampling area under alfalfa coverage were collected, and spectral reflectance and texture features were obtained from a multispectral image. Moreover, the red-edge band was introduced to improve the spectral index, and gray correlation analysis was utilized to screen sensitive features. Five types of alfalfa-covered soil salinity machine learning inversion models based on random forest (RF) and extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithms were constructed, using the salinity index (SIs), vegetation index (VIs), salinity index + vegetation index (SIs + VIs), vegetation index + texture feature (VIs + TFs), and vegetation index + texture index (VIs + TIs). The determination coefficient R 2 , root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to evaluate each model’s performance. The results show that the VIs model is more accurate than the SIs and SIs +VIs models. Combining texture information with VIs improves the inversion accuracy, and the VIs + TIs model has the best inversion effect. From the perspective of inversion depth, the inversion effect for 0–15 cm soil salinity was significantly better than that for other depths, and was the best inversion depth under alfalfa cover. The average R 2 of the RF model was 10% higher than that of the ELM. The RF algorithm has high inversion accuracy and stability and performs better than ELM. These findings can serve as a theoretical basis for the efficient inversion of soil salinity and management of saline–alkali lands.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenju Zhao & Fangfang Ma & Haiying Yu & Zhaozhao Li, 2023. "Inversion Model of Salt Content in Alfalfa-Covered Soil Based on a Combination of UAV Spectral and Texture Information," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1530-:d:1207984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng, Minghan & Jiao, Xiyun & Liu, Yadong & Shao, Mingchao & Yu, Xun & Bai, Yi & Wang, Zixu & Wang, Siyu & Tuohuti, Nuremanguli & Liu, Shuaibing & Shi, Lei & Yin, Dameng & Huang, Xiao & Nie, Chenwei , 2022. "Estimation of soil moisture content under high maize canopy coverage from UAV multimodal data and machine learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Yuan Qiu & Yamin Wang & Yaqiong Fan & Xinmei Hao & Sien Li & Shaozhong Kang, 2023. "Root, Yield, and Quality of Alfalfa Affected by Soil Salinity in Northwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Ahmed S. Abuzaid & Mostafa S. El-Komy & Mohamed S. Shokr & Ahmed A. El Baroudy & Elsayed Said Mohamed & Nazih Y. Rebouh & Mohamed S. Abdel-Hai, 2023. "Predicting Dynamics of Soil Salinity and Sodicity Using Remote Sensing Techniques: A Landscape-Scale Assessment in the Northeastern Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Romero-Trigueros, Cristina & Nortes, Pedro A. & Alarcón, Juan J. & Hunink, Johannes E. & Parra, Margarita & Contreras, Sergio & Droogers, Peter & Nicolás, Emilio, 2017. "Effects of saline reclaimed waters and deficit irrigation on Citrus physiology assessed by UAV remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 60-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedrero, Francisco & Grattan, S.R. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Vivaldi, Gaetano Alessandro, 2020. "Opportunities for expanding the use of wastewaters for irrigation of olives," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Meng Luo & Shengwei Zhang & Lei Huang & Zhiqiang Liu & Lin Yang & Ruishen Li & Xi Lin, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Environment Quality Based on RSEI: A Case Study in Ulan Mulun River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Deng, Juntao & Pan, Shijia & Zhou, Mingu & Gao, Wen & Yan, Yuncai & Niu, Zijie & Han, Wenting, 2023. "Optimum sampling window size and vegetation index selection for low-altitude multispectral estimation of root soil moisture content for Xuxiang Kiwifruit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Muhammad Ihtisham & Muhammad Khayyam & Sohaib Ismail, 2021. "Current Progress and Future Prospects of Agriculture Technology: Gateway to Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Bastida, F. & Torres, I.F. & Abadía, J. & Romero-Trigueros, C. & Ruiz-Navarro, A. & Alarcón, J.J. & García, C. & Nicolás, E., 2018. "Comparing the impacts of drip irrigation by freshwater and reclaimed wastewater on the soil microbial community of two citrus species," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 53-62.
    6. Sandra Ricart & Rubén A. Villar-Navascués & Maria Hernández-Hernández & Antonio M. Rico-Amorós & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Enrique Moltó-Mantero, 2021. "Extending Natural Limits to Address Water Scarcity? The Role of Non-Conventional Water Fluxes in Climate Change Adaptation Capacity: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, February.
    7. Yi Tang & Yang Pan & Lei Zhang & Hongchen Yi & Yiping Gu & Weihao Sun, 2023. "Efficient Monitoring of Total Suspended Matter in Urban Water Based on UAV Multi-spectral Images," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(5), pages 2143-2160, March.
    8. Ricart, Sandra & Rico, Antonio M., 2019. "Assessing technical and social driving factors of water reuse in agriculture: A review on risks, regulation and the yuck factor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 426-439.
    9. García, Ana Belén Mira & Romero-Trigueros, Cristina & Gambín, José María Bayona & Sánchez Iglesias, Ma del Puerto & Tortosa, Pedro Antonio Nortes & Nicolás, Emilio Nicolás, 2023. "Estimation of stomatal conductance by infra-red thermometry in citrus trees cultivated under regulated deficit irrigation and reclaimed water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. Gao, Yang & Shao, Guangcheng & Wu, Shiqing & Xiaojun, Wang & Lu, Jia & Cui, Jintao, 2021. "Changes in soil salinity under treated wastewater irrigation: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Romeu Gerardo & Isabel P. de Lima, 2023. "Applying RGB-Based Vegetation Indices Obtained from UAS Imagery for Monitoring the Rice Crop at the Field Scale: A Case Study in Portugal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Abadía, J. & Bastida, F. & Romero-Trigueros, C. & Bayona, J.M. & Vera, A. & García, C. & Alarcón, J.J. & Nicolás, E., 2021. "Interactions between soil microbial communities and agronomic behavior in a mandarin crop subjected to water deficit and irrigated with reclaimed water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    13. Cheng, Minghan & Sun, Chengming & Nie, Chenwei & Liu, Shuaibing & Yu, Xun & Bai, Yi & Liu, Yadong & Meng, Lin & Jia, Xiao & Liu, Yuan & Zhou, Lili & Nan, Fei & Cui, Tengyu & Jin, Xiuliang, 2023. "Evaluation of UAV-based drought indices for crop water conditions monitoring: A case study of summer maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1530-:d:1207984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.