IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i3p716-d1102550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detection of Xylella fastidiosa in Host Plants and Insect Vectors by Droplet Digital PCR

Author

Listed:
  • Serafina Serena Amoia

    (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP)—National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy
    Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Angelantonio Minafra

    (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP)—National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Angela Ligorio

    (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP)—National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Cavalieri

    (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP)—National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Donato Boscia

    (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP)—National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Maria Saponari

    (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP)—National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Giuliana Loconsole

    (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP)—National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

Xylella fastidiosa ( Xf ) is a Gram-negative plant bacterium that causes severe diseases affecting several economically important crops in many countries. To achieve early detection of the pathogen, a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based approach was used to detect the bacterium at low concentrations in different plant species and insect vectors. In this study, we implemented the reaction conditions of a previously developed ddPCR assay, and we validated its use to detect Xf in insect vectors as well as in a broader list of host species. More specifically, the sensitivity and accuracy of the protocol were assessed by testing five plant matrices ( Olea europaea , Nerium oleander , Vitis vinifera , Citrus sinensis , and Prunus dulcis ), and for the first time, the insect vector ( Philaenus spumarius ), was either naturally infected or artificially spiked with bacterial suspension at known concentrations. The lowest concentrations detected by ddPCR were 5 ag/µL of bacterial DNA and 1.00 × 10 2 CFU/mL of bacterial cells. Both techniques showed a high degree of linearity, with R 2 values ranging from 0.9905 to 0.9995 and from 0.9726 to 0.9977, respectively, for qPCR and ddPCR. Under our conditions, ddPCR showed greater analytical sensitivity than qPCR for O. europea , C. sinensis , and N. oleander . Overall, the results demonstrated that the validated ddPCR assay enables the absolute quantification of Xf target sequences with high accuracy compared with the qPCR assay, and can support experimental research programs and the official controls, particularly when doubtful or inconclusive results are recorded by qPCR.

Suggested Citation

  • Serafina Serena Amoia & Angelantonio Minafra & Angela Ligorio & Vincenzo Cavalieri & Donato Boscia & Maria Saponari & Giuliana Loconsole, 2023. "Detection of Xylella fastidiosa in Host Plants and Insect Vectors by Droplet Digital PCR," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:716-:d:1102550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Luvisi & Francesca Nicolì & Luigi De Bellis, 2017. "Sustainable Management of Plant Quarantine Pests: The Case of Olive Quick Decline Syndrome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Castellano & Antonella Di Palma & Giacinto S. Germinara & Marco Lippolis & Giuseppe Starace & Giacomo Scarascia-Mugnozza, 2019. "Experimental Nets for a Protection System against the Vectors of Xylella fastidiosa Wells et al," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, February.
    2. Schneider, Kevin & Mourits, Monique & van der Werf, Wopke & Lansink, Alfons Oude, 2021. "On consumer impact from Xylella fastidiosa subspecies pauca," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Esther Lantero & Beatriz Matallanas & Susana Pascual & Carmen Callejas, 2018. "PCR Species-Specific Primers for Molecular Gut Content Analysis to Determine the Contribution of Generalist Predators to the Biological Control of the Vector of Xylella fastidiosa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-8, June.
    4. Teodoro Semeraro & Elisa Gatto & Riccardo Buccolieri & Marzia Vergine & Zhi Gao & Luigi De Bellis & Andrea Luvisi, 2019. "Changes in Olive Urban Forests Infected by Xylella fastidiosa : Impact on Microclimate and Social Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Giuseppe Maggiore & Teodoro Semeraro & Roberta Aretano & Luigi De Bellis & Andrea Luvisi, 2019. "GIS Analysis of Land-Use Change in Threatened Landscapes by Xylella fastidiosa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Yiannis Ampatzidis & Luigi De Bellis & Andrea Luvisi, 2017. "iPathology: Robotic Applications and Management of Plants and Plant Diseases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:716-:d:1102550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.