IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1449-d913283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Conservation Tillage on Soil Properties and Maize Yield in Karst Regions, Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Lizhen Bai

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Xiangying Kong

    (Faculty of Architecture and City Planning, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Hui Li

    (Shandong Academy of Agricultural Machinery Sciences, Ji’nan 250100, China)

  • Huibin Zhu

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Chengwu Wang

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Shiao Ma

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

Karst rocky desertification associated with human disturbance is one of the most serious eco-environmental problems, threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in southwestern China. In the current study, the practice of conservation tillage as one of the best ways of reducing the constraints is addressed. During a two-year trial (2014–2015), the effects of no tillage with straw cover (NT) and traditional tillage (TT) on soil properties and maize yields were investigated in karst regions, Southwest China. The results showed that the trial with NT increased soil moisture content by 3%, while decreasing soil bulk density by 7% in the top 30 cm compared with TT. In 2014, within 0–30 cm of soil depth, total nitrogen under NT treatment was 5% higher than that under TT treatment. In 2015, the mean soil organic matter (SOM) and available P were enhanced to 12% and 13% in 0–30 cm soil depth more than that under TT, respectively. The trial with NT significantly ( p < 0.05) increased available N in the top 20 cm by 9% as compared to TT. This improvement in soil physical and chemical properties might have increased the crop yield. After the two-year trial with NT, the mean maize yields increased by 11% compared with the TT trial. Therefore, conservation tillage is the better option considering long-term environmental sustainability in karst regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lizhen Bai & Xiangying Kong & Hui Li & Huibin Zhu & Chengwu Wang & Shiao Ma, 2022. "Effects of Conservation Tillage on Soil Properties and Maize Yield in Karst Regions, Southwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-10, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1449-:d:913283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1449/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1449/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irmak, Suat & Kukal, Meetpal S. & Mohammed, Ali T. & Djaman, Koffi, 2019. "Disk-till vs. no-till maize evapotranspiration, microclimate, grain yield, production functions and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 177-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehmet Emin Bilgili & Yasemin Vurarak & Ali Aybek, 2023. "Determination of Performance of No-Till Seeder and Stubble Cutting Prototype," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gustavo Castilho Beruski & Luis Miguel Schiebelbein & André Belmont Pereira, 2020. "Maize Yield Components as Affected by Plant Population, Planting Date and Soil Coverings in Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Kukal, M.S. & Irmak, S., 2020. "Impact of irrigation on interannual variability in United States agricultural productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Irmak, Suat & Kukal, Meetpal S., 2019. "Disk-till vs. no-till maize grass- and alfalfa-reference single (average) and basal (dual) crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Pinheiro, Everton Alves Rodrigues & de Jong van Lier, Quirijn & Šimůnek, Jirka, 2019. "The role of soil hydraulic properties in crop water use efficiency: A process-based analysis for some Brazilian scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 364-377.
    5. Zhang, Qichen & Dong, Weihong & Wen, Chuanlei & Li, Tong, 2020. "Study on factors affecting corn yield based on the Cobb-Douglas production function," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Huang, Yawen & Tao, Bo & Xiaochen, Zhu & Yang, Yanjun & Liang, Liang & Wang, Lixin & Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre & Tian, Hanqin & Ren, Wei, 2021. "Conservation tillage increases corn and soybean water productivity across the Ohio River Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Gardner, A.S. & Maclean, I.M.D. & Gaston, K.J. & Bütikofer, L., 2021. "Forecasting future crop suitability with microclimate data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Irmak, Suat & Brar, Dilshad & Kukal, Meetpal S. & Odhiambo, Lameck & Djaman, Koffi, 2022. "Automated real-time irrigation analytics inform diversity in regional irrigator behavior and water withdrawal and use characteristics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1449-:d:913283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.