IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i6p211-d1667384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Impact of Employee Investigations on Those Who Lead Them: A Case Study from NHS Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Jonathan Cooper

    (Aneurin Bevan Wellbeing Service, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Llanfrechfa Grange Hospital, Caerleon Rd, Cwmbran NP44 8YN, UK
    School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Doris Anita Behrens

    (Aneurin Bevan Wellbeing Service, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Llanfrechfa Grange Hospital, Caerleon Rd, Cwmbran NP44 8YN, UK
    Department for Economy and Health, University of Krems, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
    School of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff CF24 4AG, UK)

  • Sophie Elizabeth Jones

    (Aneurin Bevan Wellbeing Service, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Llanfrechfa Grange Hospital, Caerleon Rd, Cwmbran NP44 8YN, UK)

  • Adrian Neal

    (Aneurin Bevan Wellbeing Service, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Llanfrechfa Grange Hospital, Caerleon Rd, Cwmbran NP44 8YN, UK
    School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Aled Jones

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Walter Hyll

    (Department for Economy and Health, University of Krems, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria)

Abstract

In healthcare, there is growing awareness of the potential harm that disciplinary processes can have on employees, service delivery, and organizational culture. However, little attention has been given to the impact on those responsible for conducting these investigations. This study examines investigator harm through a cross-sectional survey, simultaneously collecting qualitative and quantitative data from 71 participants across 10 NHS Wales organizations. The findings indicate that investigators experience harm when conducting employee investigations. While those with more experience perceive themselves as better prepared to follow the formal steps of the disciplinary policy and process, their ability to prevent harm to themselves or others remains unchanged. Additionally, more experienced investigators are not more aware of their organization’s well-being priorities or strategies for mitigating harm. These findings highlight the need for greater support for investigators, including coaching and post-investigation debriefing. Training should raise awareness of the impact of employee investigations on all stakeholders and the importance of applying disciplinary policy and processes empathically. Finally, policies and processes should acknowledge the harm they may cause and explicitly provide strategies for harm reduction, such as treating formal investigations as a measure of ‘last resort’.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Jonathan Cooper & Doris Anita Behrens & Sophie Elizabeth Jones & Adrian Neal & Aled Jones & Walter Hyll, 2025. "Understanding the Impact of Employee Investigations on Those Who Lead Them: A Case Study from NHS Wales," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:211-:d:1667384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/6/211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/6/211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reinhard Strametz & Johannes C. Fendel & Peter Koch & Hannah Roesner & Max Zilezinski & Stefan Bushuven & Matthias Raspe, 2021. "Prevalence of Second Victims, Risk Factors, and Support Strategies among German Nurses (SeViD-II Survey)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angel Cobos-Vargas & Pastora Pérez-Pérez & María Núñez-Núñez & Eloísa Casado-Fernández & Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, 2022. "Second Victim Support at the Core of Severe Adverse Event Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Samuel Ganahl & Mario Knaus & Isabell Wiesenhuetter & Victoria Klemm & Eva M. Jabinger & Reinhard Strametz, 2022. "Second Victims in Intensive Care—Emotional Stress and Traumatization of Intensive Care Nurses in Western Austria after Adverse Events during the Treatment of Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Milena Trifunovic-Koenig & Reinhard Strametz & Bianka Gerber & Sneha Mantri & Stefan Bushuven, 2022. "Validation of the German Version of the Moral Injury Symptom and Support Scale for Health Professionals (G-MISS-HP) and Its Correlation to the Second Victim Phenomenon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Maike Riegel & Victoria Klemm & Stefan Bushuven & Reinhard Strametz, 2022. "Self-Stigmatization of Healthcare Workers in Intensive Care, Acute, and Emergency Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, October.
    5. Martina Schmiedhofer & Christina Derksen & Johanna Elisa Dietl & Freya Haeussler & Reinhard Strametz & Beate Huener & Sonia Lippke, 2022. "The Impact of a Communication Training on the Birth Experience: Qualitative Interviews with Mothers after Giving Birth at Obstetric University Departments in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Elisabeth Krommer & Miriam Ablöscher & Victoria Klemm & Christian Gatterer & Hannah Rösner & Reinhard Strametz & Wolfgang Huf & Brigitte Ettl, 2023. "Second Victim Phenomenon in an Austrian Hospital before the Implementation of the Systematic Collegial Help Program KoHi: A Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-9, January.
    7. Hartwig Marung & Reinhard Strametz & Hannah Roesner & Florian Reifferscheid & Rainer Petzina & Victoria Klemm & Milena Trifunovic-Koenig & Stefan Bushuven, 2023. "Second Victims among German Emergency Medical Services Physicians (SeViD-III-Study)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Dominik Hinzmann & Marion Koll-Krüsmann & Andrea Forster & Andreas Schießl & Andreas Igl & Susanne Katharina Heininger, 2022. "First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Stefan Bushuven & Milena Trifunovic-Koenig & Michael Bentele & Stefanie Bentele & Reinhard Strametz & Victoria Klemm & Matthias Raspe, 2022. "Self-Assessment and Learning Motivation in the Second Victim Phenomenon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:211-:d:1667384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.